this post was submitted on 13 Feb 2026
229 points (89.9% liked)

Flippanarchy

2046 readers
540 users here now

Flippant Anarchism. A lighter take on social criticism with the aim of agitation.

Post humorous takes on capitalism and the states which prop it up. Memes, shitposting, screenshots of humorous good takes, discussions making fun of some reactionary online, it all works.

This community is anarchist-flavored. Reactionary takes won't be tolerated.

Don't take yourselves too seriously. Serious posts go to !anarchism@lemmy.dbzer0.com

Rules


  1. If you post images with text, endeavour to provide the alt-text

  2. If the image is a crosspost from an OP, Provide the source.

  3. Absolutely no right-wing jokes. This includes "Anarcho"-Capitalist concepts.

  4. Absolutely no redfash jokes. This includes anything that props up the capitalist ruling classes pretending to be communists.

  5. No bigotry whatsoever. See instance rules.

  6. This is an anarchist comm. You don't have to be an anarchist to post, but you should at least understand what anarchism actually is. We're not here to educate you.

  7. No shaming people for being anti-electoralism. This should be obvious from the above point but apparently we need to make it obvious to the turbolibs who can't control themselves. You have the rest of lemmy to moralize.


Join the matrix room for some real-time discussion.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 34 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 6 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Leftists: also i am not going to run myself

[–] dream_weasel@sh.itjust.works 1 points 28 minutes ago

Or vote or canvas or help in any way. Bring me a candidate!

[–] theuniqueone@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 1 hour ago

Don't you know you cant criticize any politician because they may be the appointed "lesser evil" possibly in several years.

[–] Dippy@beehaw.org 5 points 1 hour ago

Hey so its actually that we have 2 years to uplift leftwing ideals until the general election, at which point we vote for the candidate who wants to bring the Torment Nexus levels down a little so that the Candidate who wants to double the Torment Nexus loses and we have a few years of lower torment while we uplift leftwing ideals again.

[–] Godric@lemmy.world 0 points 17 minutes ago

If you don't like the candidates, you RIGHT NOW need to be running or organizing a movement for someone who is! Are you using your power to get progressives to win primaries or just complaining about the result you let be decided for you?

https://runforsomething.net/

Don't content yourself with another election cycle of "we tried nothing and we're all out of ideas" followed by a couple more years of snide whining. Be the change, for the love god please, because we need one.

[–] Foni@piefed.zip 5 points 2 hours ago (6 children)

As a non-American I have to admit that I don't understand how primaries work in that country. Why are the liberals who choose the candidate and not the leftists?

[–] marcos@lemmy.world 2 points 21 minutes ago

Well, if you get them to even tell you what a "liberal" is, you are lucky.

Their primaries are a real election they have inside each party to pick the candidates. If you have only 2 parties, it's a hard requirement. The people enlisted to each party vote on them (it seems that if you only have 2 real parties and primaries are your real elections, lots of people enlist in a party).

[–] WizardofFrobozz@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 hour ago

The US doesn’t have leftists.

[–] Einskjaldi@lemmy.world 3 points 1 hour ago

Because most people don't know the difference. it's mostly just name recognition so you have to be known and at least somewhat popular.

[–] Chakravanti@monero.town 3 points 2 hours ago

As an American, I can assure they don't work. It's a fucking party. Guess why that wasn't a misnomer and what they mean by "Jerry Rigged" and "Glass" house.

Or did you think Propane was just a coincidence in naming?

[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 3 points 2 hours ago

The vast majority of people don't vote in primaries for some reason so the demographics are different from the general, but also the DNC has plenty of tricks at its disposal to get the results they want. Now part of the reason those tricks work is that American leftist politicians tend to be pussies who are unwilling to take shots at liberals, but yeah the whole process is captured by DNC liberals.

[–] sad_detective_man@sopuli.xyz 1 points 2 hours ago

In the 80's liberals got control of our progressive party, the DNC. Back then it was possible to pull voters from the right by appealing to wealth and so Clintons won by doing it.

But every election our candidates are supposed to be elected by popular vote within each party. Recently they just kind of stopped though because it turns out that was apparently just a tradition and not like an enforceable law or anything. And the Clintons wanted to have the White House again.

[–] Broadfern@lemmy.world 53 points 4 hours ago (3 children)

Imagine the world we’d live in if those corpo fucks didn’t screw over Bernie

[–] goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org 22 points 3 hours ago

Or persecuted Nixon, or Reagan, or Bush Sr, or didn't give up when gore "lost" to bush jr

[–] sad_detective_man@sopuli.xyz 34 points 4 hours ago

Hey, it was her TURN

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world -2 points 4 hours ago (2 children)

He would have been absolutely hamstrung by the the bullshit factory that is the legislature, and nothing good would have happened that wasn’t undone immediately by the next administration.

[–] resipsaloquitur@lemmy.world 7 points 3 hours ago (2 children)

Haven’t you been reading the news? Apparently you don’t need congress.

[–] jol@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 3 hours ago (2 children)

People are OK with auth right. But auth left? Oh no, that's not gonna happen. The military would coup the shit out of that real quick.

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 hours ago

Auth Left is still inherently abusive.

No matter how much you pretend that it's for the greater good, authoritarianism will always be detrimental to the relatively powerless masses.

[–] resipsaloquitur@lemmy.world 3 points 3 hours ago

“People” or Russian bots?

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world -5 points 2 hours ago (2 children)

The problem with the Democrats is that they still have respect for the constitution and institutions. Otherwise they’d get a lot done.

[–] resipsaloquitur@lemmy.world 10 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

I don’t agree. They waited until they lost a supermajority in congress to push healthcare reform (what became Obamacare). And dang, wouldn’t you know it, mean old republicans wouldn’t let us have single payer.

So we got a healthcare bill that mandated we buy (generally) private market insurance. A bill written by Penny Pritzker, an insurance industry lobbyist.

It’s kabuki. There’s only one party — the billionaire party.

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 2 hours ago

No, the problem with the leading Dems is that they ONLY respect the institutions. And their owner donors, of course.

They'd rather let a million people die from lack of political action to save them than subvert the Holy System or inconvenience the rich people legally (and sometimes illegally) bribing them.

[–] Broadfern@lemmy.world 12 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Also true.

Not that there’s really any “winning” here but it’s nice to dream of the imaginary reprieve we never got.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 7 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

Life is pain, highness. Anyone who says different is selling you something.

[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 34 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (1 children)

Here's a fun idea: how about no more presidents?

[–] resipsaloquitur@lemmy.world 7 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Telling on themselves, aren’t they?

We were right about Kamala.

[–] AntiBullyRanger@ani.social 2 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

brattykat is being sardonic there

[–] resipsaloquitur@lemmy.world 3 points 1 hour ago

On one layer.

Maybe the OP didn’t intend it, but you can also read the fictional liberal as being unable to imagine a democratic candidate that isn’t genocidal.

[–] kowcop@aussie.zone 8 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (2 children)

I thought the US had two term limits?

[–] sad_detective_man@sopuli.xyz 28 points 4 hours ago

The post is probably referring to our previous elections he ran in.

But the dude's been testing the waters to break that amendment. He's kind of in this weird state of transgression where when he does pull shit nobody takes him to task because they either directly benefit from it or they benefit from publicly opposing him but failing to to hold him accountable.

[–] Catoblepas@piefed.blahaj.zone 3 points 3 hours ago

Do Republicans?

[–] AntiBullyRanger@ani.social -4 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

Why did nobody tell me bratty kitty exists‽
Why are they even in NaziSky?