this post was submitted on 17 Feb 2026
999 points (90.0% liked)
Lemmy Shitpost
37925 readers
5085 users here now
Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.
Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!
Rules:
1. Be Respectful
Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.
Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.
...
2. No Illegal Content
Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.
That means:
-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals
-No CSA content or Revenge Porn
-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)
...
3. No Spam
Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.
-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.
-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.
-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers
-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.
...
4. No Porn/Explicit
Content
-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.
-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.
...
5. No Enciting Harassment,
Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts
-Do not Brigade other Communities
-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.
-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.
-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.
...
6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.
-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.
-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.
...
If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.
Also check out:
Partnered Communities:
1.Memes
10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)
Reach out to
All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Harris chose to lose the most winnable election in history because Democrats know they can punish voters for being disloyal simply by allowing Republicans to win. If you demand too much from Democrats they will throw the election. It's essentially a hostage situation, you must give unconditional support to the Good Cop or the Bad Cop will beat you to death. You don't want the Bad Cop, do you?
If we don't abolish this system we're all going to die.
I shouldn't have to scroll this far for a bit of sanity on God's Lemmy. π
Only a moron would have looked at the two options we had and not picked Harris.
Was she a good candidate? Actually yes if you look at her Senate voting history. She was closer to Sanders than any other senator. She also, as VP, supported investigating Israel so they could bypass the law requiring us to give support.
Did she run a good campaign? Absolutely not. But, she basically had no time to actually run one. She needed money, fast, so she softened her stance on some things to secure it.
Was it a bad move? Yes. Was it a bad enough move to let Donald "I'm going to be a dictator on day one and you'll never have to vote again" Trump win? Absolutely not.
Do you think you're going to be able to reason with someone who literally just said that the Democrats threw the election on purpose because online leftists "demanded too much"?
Do online leftists hold any significant number?
If they do, like they love to pretend to, then they are part of the people responsible for all the horrible things Trump is doing. If they're not, then why should anyone care?
Nah, not at all. I know I'm wasting my time
We're also a country made of idiots who as soon as we see somebody telling us shit we don't want to hear we throw a tantrum and lose all ability to rationalize.
The DNC is an evil organization that is propping up a genocide and is mostly responsible to the whims of corporations. But that is because the DNC is essentially controlled by a group of republicans.
Harris ran a shit campaign because Joe Biden should have retired earlier and there should have been a big primary. This goes back to the 2020 election where Biden was basically propped up by the DNC and it turns out they propped up a senile old man with cancer.
Like any reasonable democrat running for office now should be saying we should put more democrats voters into the DNC and push out lobbyists.
Are you seriously citing Senate voting history for what makes a good candidate? This is why liberals lose. They simply don't have the sauce.
Are you seriously suggesting someone's ACTIONS aren't a good indicator?
What an idiot.
What's your alternative that isn't completely insane, "The Revolution will come" levels stupid? What a politician actually supports (instead of what they say) is the CLOSEST we will ever get objective proof of a candidates position.
Dems already shat the bed in 2022, handing Republicans a narrow majority in the House because they refused to pursue Congressional criminal misconduct from the prior administration or do anything about state voter disenfranchisement or gerrymandering while they controlled the federal government. Nevermind the clown car of corporate toadies and unloveable hacks they larded up with corporate donations.
Little reason to believe they'd do better in 2024, given that Biden made "supporting a genocide" and "rolling back COVID benefits" his central platforms for the next two years.
How is an election "winnable" when your party is married to policies everyone hates? It's like complaining about Mitt Romney losing in 2012, when Obama was underwater. The GOP trotted out an absolutely odious corporate turd - a man who literally penned the editorial "Let Detroit Go Bankrupt" four years earlier - and married him to a nepo-baby who hates social security as VP. Of course they fucking lost.
You don't get to talk about an election being "winnable" if you insist sandbagging the primaries to run loser candidates in the general.
2024 was Trump's election to lose. He capitalized on people's disgust with liberals. He leaned heavily on TPUSA, QAnon, and other effective social media campaigns to juice MAGA support. He promised to bail out TikTok, the only company that wasn't run by an American oligarch, while Biden was threatening to run them out of business. He rallied his base voters while liberals embarked upon the worst internal voter suppression campaign since 1968. And he did it all as fascist tendencies in the US were cresting.
Harris wasn't running a winnable campaign. She was struggling (badly) to bail out a floundering Biden debacle.
Everyone dies eventually. But this government seems intent on accelerating things.
And the fact is that you tell people this, verifiable fact, and they get mad and stick fingers in their ears. They really want to lose.
I remember debates on Reddit. I kept pointing out that the official inflation figures fail to measure the pain people were figuring. But I just got downvoted to Hell by a bunch of troglodytes mindlessly parroting the CPI figures, as if that was the only thing that matters.
There is a severe strain of Orwellian magical thinking among liberals. Speak no evil, see no evil, hear no evil. Ignore all bad news and try to give your way to victory.
Trump only got 49.9% of the vote. He has never been popular, even by capitalizing on disgust with liberals. It really wasn't his election to lose, he's not actually a strong candidate. He won by playing against an opponent that doesn't want to win.
Idk about you, but 49.9% of the vote sounds very popular to me.
Hell 10% sounds popular.
I don't think the issue is his popularity. He's definitely popular
Far be it from me to argue against the US being a backwards shithole racist country, because it obviously is and death to Amerikkka, but I don't like the narrative that he had some kind of mandate to govern because he is so popular. He really doesn't. He's started without a majority and it's been down hill ever since.
By the by, that's just of the people who bothered to vote. If we counted non-voters, he got 32%
I take issue with your use of the adjective "good" in "good cop".
Only an idiot would look at the two options and not choose Harris. She wasn't a great candidate, but she was orders of magnitude better than the alternative.
The time to protest vote is in the primaries.
The DNC didn't allow us to protest vote though... they forced Biden, he proved too feeble, forced Harris, who backed Isreal, and then (yet a-fucking-gain) saw a weak voter turnout. I voted for the lesser of two evils, while holding my nose, like I needed to... but the rest of the country hates women and is too stupid to know what's in our conjoined best-interest.
The dnc has been totally out to lunch since at least 2012. Shit I'm at a point I'd be happy to see a good Republican candidate, u ever listen to George Bush talking when he was in office? The goal posts have moved so far right he sounds like a democratic leftie by todays standards.
It was in 2008, DNC went hard on fucking over Obama, and rather than reform the DNC when he won, he washed his hands of them. Now we're here, with a group that cares more about controlling the field of candidates rather than winning a general election.
The DNC wanted the win of "first black president" and never wanted to push for polices to allow another one to happen.
It really fucks with your mind doesn't it? I'm not even THAT old, and even I recall when Republicans were slightly more left than modern Democrats.
Before 9/11 he actually wanted to fast track the path to citizenship. I think if it hadn't happened he would have been a pretty ok one term president.
There were primaries?
The primaries are run by the DNC, you silly goose!