this post was submitted on 17 Feb 2026
1002 points (90.0% liked)
Lemmy Shitpost
37925 readers
4940 users here now
Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.
Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!
Rules:
1. Be Respectful
Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.
Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.
...
2. No Illegal Content
Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.
That means:
-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals
-No CSA content or Revenge Porn
-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)
...
3. No Spam
Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.
-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.
-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.
-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers
-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.
...
4. No Porn/Explicit
Content
-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.
-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.
...
5. No Enciting Harassment,
Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts
-Do not Brigade other Communities
-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.
-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.
-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.
...
6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.
-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.
-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.
...
If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.
Also check out:
Partnered Communities:
1.Memes
10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)
Reach out to
All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Only a moron would have looked at the two options we had and not picked Harris.
Was she a good candidate? Actually yes if you look at her Senate voting history. She was closer to Sanders than any other senator. She also, as VP, supported investigating Israel so they could bypass the law requiring us to give support.
Did she run a good campaign? Absolutely not. But, she basically had no time to actually run one. She needed money, fast, so she softened her stance on some things to secure it.
Was it a bad move? Yes. Was it a bad enough move to let Donald "I'm going to be a dictator on day one and you'll never have to vote again" Trump win? Absolutely not.
Do you think you're going to be able to reason with someone who literally just said that the Democrats threw the election on purpose because online leftists "demanded too much"?
Do online leftists hold any significant number?
If they do, like they love to pretend to, then they are part of the people responsible for all the horrible things Trump is doing. If they're not, then why should anyone care?
Nah, not at all. I know I'm wasting my time
We're also a country made of idiots who as soon as we see somebody telling us shit we don't want to hear we throw a tantrum and lose all ability to rationalize.
The DNC is an evil organization that is propping up a genocide and is mostly responsible to the whims of corporations. But that is because the DNC is essentially controlled by a group of republicans.
Harris ran a shit campaign because Joe Biden should have retired earlier and there should have been a big primary. This goes back to the 2020 election where Biden was basically propped up by the DNC and it turns out they propped up a senile old man with cancer.
Like any reasonable democrat running for office now should be saying we should put more democrats voters into the DNC and push out lobbyists.
Are you seriously citing Senate voting history for what makes a good candidate? This is why liberals lose. They simply don't have the sauce.
Are you seriously suggesting someone's ACTIONS aren't a good indicator?
What an idiot.
What's your alternative that isn't completely insane, "The Revolution will come" levels stupid? What a politician actually supports (instead of what they say) is the CLOSEST we will ever get objective proof of a candidates position.
OK, but she didn't have time to run a better campaign because a lot of influential people (Harris included) in the Democratic party decided it was better to hide Biden's deteriorating condition than confront it.
Does this seem like the actions of a party that genuinely considers Trump an existential threat?
A longer campaign would have made Harris perform worse.
They (the Biden admin) purposefully withheld polling data that showed he had 0 chance to win, him and Kamala. Rather than attempt to find a candidate who would be popular in the general, they canceled the primaries.
Biden admin all but promised they would run 1 term in 2020, it was strictly an anti trump ticket in a post-covid world that was sick of him.
Trump was very simply a more popular candidate in 2024 who ran a much better campaign that wasn't hamstrung by NOT talking about Palestine, the biggest news story at the time. People entirely forgot how bad he ratfucked us on covid, they remembered the name on the checks.
Any facist who follows that playbook within the general election will do the same, especially if there's a opposition that quite literally knew they would lose and ran anyway. American elections are a joke because the American populace is fully captured by advertising and thus remain uneducated and ignorant.
Kamala could have won if Biden left later. Her best performance was immediately after he stepped down because they kept her from talking the entire Biden campaign (she was very unpopular). The second she had time to talk it was over, Kamala is a bad public speaker and terrible on the spot.
I'll even tell you the moment she lost it. When she said the wall was a good idea on national television to Anderson Cooper. That was it. American elections are a popularity contest, we (the American populace) don't take them seriously.
That rather conveniently runs cover for the organization that does the most to decide what kind of campaign is run.
Like, oooh millions of people are disorganized and stupid. Shocker, Mr. Sherlock. But the small, powerful node of party leadership is also stupid and disorganized. That's actually much more of pressing concern than, lol americans dumb
Americans are dumb because the system works as designed. The rich remove value, the populace feels like they have a say in things when really the decisions are made for them at a much higher level.
The party leadership isn't stupid, the parties themselves act like corporations with diffusive responsibilities and agendas that lead to the same ends, the party leadership is agenda driven on maintaining power. Much like the party is.
The state of American voters and voting is a result that was arrived at on purpose. The populace doesn't actually have any power in this representative democracy at the highest levels. It's pure oligarchy.
The DNC isn't stupid, it's evil.
I completely agree
except for this. Two things can be true at once.
Lmao fair!
Does it matter? By voting 3rd party or abstaining you didn't hurt the DNC. It hurt everyone else in the country and in other countries we provided aid to. Cuba and Venezuela too.
The presidential election isn't the time for protest voting when the opposition is literally telling you that you won't ever get to vote again.
You want to hurt the DNC? Do it in the primaries.
OK, so we're gonna quibble over 3rd party voters again, and just dismiss the fact that DNC leadership doesn't take this seriously. Great.
So do you think abstaining or protest voting 3rd party made them take it seriously? Did they change their tune when they lost? Do you honestly think the country is better for Trump beating Harris?
I'm not saying the DNC is flawless; I think it needs to go down in flames. But I'm also not stupid and understand the concept of prioritization.
Well that's funny, since you're not actually prioritizing well. Talking about 3rd-party/abstaining voters is a wasted effort. You reach those people with broad, national messaging. The kind you and I, on a dinky little not-reddit, don't have access to.
You really gonna stop and have this conversation with each and every individual you assume didn't vote Harris? You think that's gonna move the needle? In an electoral environment measured in the hundred millions? That's not a very effective use of your limited rhetorical time.
Why not prioritize getting the Democrats to actually take this seriously, to run a campaign that activates non-voters?
Oh, I know it won't move the needle, I'm just pissed that idiots chose this election to take a pointless stand against the DNC and venting my frustration. They're complicit in all of the harm done by Trump and friends due to how our election system works.
Harm reduction only reduces harm in the short term. You're still feeding the system that got the country in that situation to begin with.
What election would you have preferred they take that stand?
Future primaries and congressional elections.
You don't stop to call the electrician when your house is on fire. You put out the fire first or you won't have any wiring left to fix.
One side provided a step by step plan on exactly how they were going to enact a hostile fascist take over the country so you'd never get a chance to vote again, and people decided that it was worth the risk as long as a mediocre Democrat candidate didn't win.
I think you're over-estimating how plugged in the yankee electorate actually is. Google searches for "did Biden drop out" spiked on election day. Most people have not heard about project 2025. Most people were complaining about grocery prices.
The people who took a moral principle and abstained from voting for the lesser of two genocides, they weren't what flipped the election. It was almost completely a cost of living election.
The only way to actually reform the DNC is to elect an outsider even if they are more likely to lose the general election.
Elect an outsider in the primaries, right?
The DNC controls the primaries.
Yes
Then I agree with you. The primaries are where the stand should take place, but after that you're stuck with two viable options.
I think in most part that's correct unless a party hits below 25% polling for some reason (at that point its actually a good idea to support third parties). I also think we should make more efforts to get some sort of proportional voting system to replace the current, shitty first past the post system.