this post was submitted on 22 Nov 2025
36 points (100.0% liked)

Canada

10729 readers
277 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Highlights

  • Out of the 25 OECD countries analyzed, the ones with greater for-profit privatization in health care have worse outcomes for seven mortality indicators.
  • The relationship between greater for-profit privatization and higher mortality rates is even clearer for the private delivery of health care services than for the private financing of health care services.
  • The countries that combine high private financing and high private delivery of health care services have the worst life expectancy and mortality outcomes. Meanwhile, the countries with low private financing and low private delivery of health care services have the best outcomes. Countries with a mixed model place somewhere between those two ends of the spectrum.
  • For-profit privatization as a variable seems to play a more significant role in life expectancy and mortality rates than health spending or income inequality.
  • Canada, which is in the mixed country group, has rather mediocre life expectancy and mortality outcomes.
  • The governments of several provinces, including Quebec, have expressed a desire to further privatize the financing and delivery of health care services, but that may have negative, rather than positive, impacts on population health.
top 2 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Threeskittiesinatrenchcoat@lemmy.ca 12 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Conservatives like to point to successful integrations of private and public healthcare systems in other nations, nations where access for private options are made available through public programs and insurance. However in Canada, they want more of an American type system, where access is based solely on one's ability to pay.

It's a bait and switch being funded by Canadians entrepreneurs who see how profitable the American health insurance industry is, and want to create that same kind of market here.

[–] GalacticGrapefruit@lemmy.world 6 points 2 weeks ago

Speaking as a yank, here? Fight it like your lives fucking depend on it, because it does. DO NOT LET THEM.