this post was submitted on 04 Sep 2025
882 points (99.4% liked)

politics

25507 readers
2704 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Not a big fan of O'Keefe, but I like this!

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] betanumerus@lemmy.ca 40 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

So now we know for sure the list includes Republicans.

[–] Showroom7561@lemmy.ca 18 points 7 hours ago

LOL. Was there any doubt?

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 11 points 6 hours ago

Isn't this something that even most Republicans suspected this corrupted government would do?

All normal Americans suspected this because, well, duh. And Republicans that suspected the government under Taco would do this because that's their idea of "justice", and they expect him and his staff to deliver it.

[–] fox2263@lemmy.world 47 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Hopefully they leave in all the black redactions and not just delete them.

That way we can see how many republicans were redacted.

However I fear they’re also fabricating and just adding as many enemies they need to it for a large night of long knives. Like their version of Project Insight.

[–] bold_atlas@lemmy.world 23 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (1 children)

It'll literally be a notepad file called "jeffrey epstein list.txt" that list every democrat reps and senator.

[–] MajorasTerribleFate@lemmy.zip 19 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

jeffrey epstein list(1)(1) final(1).txt

[–] RunningInRVA@lemmy.world 7 points 8 hours ago

Don’t forget to prefix with “Copy of Copy of”

[–] DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works 69 points 16 hours ago (4 children)

They won't release it.

Because if they release a list with only Dem names on it, surely there will be a former Biden Admin official with a copy of the full unredacted list, and they could just release that as retaliation.

Neither party would want to release it, because its M.A.D. at this point.

[–] WizardofFrobozz@lemmy.ca 40 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

If there IS a hypothetical former Biden official with the full unredacted documents who doesn't have the courage to leak them, this hypothetical person needs to be hung from the nearest hypothetical tree.

[–] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 7 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Lots of MAGA claimed to want the swamp drained. Maybe a "true Qanon" person would also leak the list.

[–] WizardofFrobozz@lemmy.ca 6 points 11 hours ago

Yeah, sure would be nice if they actually had political beliefs or principles they weren’t willing to discard when it made their garbage worldview inconvenient.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Mr_Dr_Oink@lemmy.world 24 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

Its gonna be a short list.....

[–] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 7 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

Nah, they'll just put in the names of everyone they don't like. The only name I'd be certain was already there is Bill Clinton's.

[–] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 21 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Disagree. The list will be shorter, but it's not necessarily a short list. Being a Democrat doesn't stop someone from being a PoS.

A few years ago someone posted a list of reported sex crimes by politically affiliated people. It was about 60/40 Republicans.

[–] Mr_Dr_Oink@lemmy.world 6 points 11 hours ago

I know, I'm just making a joke. It wasn't literal.

[–] AcidiclyBasicGlitch@sh.itjust.works 36 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) (3 children)

Dude they are never releasing the full files. This is all just a fucking tease and while they're busy pretending to be bringing the hammer of justice down all the pedophiles they just chose to protect (once again) are casually helping set up and cement the authoritarian regime in cities across America.

Like when we reach the point that there is military patrolling every major city, elections are cancelled indefinitely for our own good, and they feel safe enough to just admit they're not releasing anything else, what do we even do?

This is like somebody who you caught robbing you, then giving you some of your stuff back to get you to shut up and not draw so much attention. Then reassuring you that you'll get the rest back soon, they just didn't feel comfortable giving it all back to you yet? What possible reason would you have to trust or believe that they'll do anything once the heat and focus has died down enough?

[–] Sunflier@lemmy.world 26 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) (2 children)

what do we even do?

The French had this idea

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 3 points 6 hours ago
[–] P1nkman@lemmy.world 9 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

I can hear the original! Peanut butter jelly time 🤘

[–] MagicShel@lemmy.zip 8 points 10 hours ago

It's choppin' off their heads time
Choppin' off their heads time
Choppin' off their heads time

[–] pupbiru@aussie.zone 4 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (1 children)

Dude they are never releasing the full files

whilst i think every reasonable person wants everyone on a hypothetical epstein list (only saying hypothetical because we don’t honestly know what’s actually there to be released: doubtful it’s as simple as a list) to be brought to justice, the point at this stage is just to speak their language: MAGA can’t be trusted, and it seems the only way they realise that is with things like this… constantly point out, on common ground, that this is all hypocritical lying bullshit

[–] Mediocre_Bard@lemmy.world 4 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

They don't care though. They know that they are hypocritical lying bullshit peddlers. To them, that is a virtue.

[–] JcbAzPx@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago

The core, ie the qanon cult, absolutely care. Their only reason for engaging in politics in the first place is to fight the demonic pedophile ring infesting the government. They just didn't realize they were voting for its leader.

[–] pupbiru@aussie.zone 2 points 7 hours ago

there’s definitely some of them that do… at the very least, there’s been a bunch of the MAGA influencers that have been pissy about it… i think that’s a useful thing to push on

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] NaibofTabr@infosec.pub 233 points 21 hours ago (4 children)

So we should assume every redacted name is a Republican, got it.

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 65 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛
⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛
⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛
⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛
⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛
⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛
⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛
⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛
Bill Clinton
⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛
⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛
⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛
⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛
⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛
⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛
⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛
⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛

Republicans: "SEE! BILL CLINTON IS THE ONLY NAME ON THE LIST!!!"

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 2 points 6 hours ago

and three Joos.

[–] Boddhisatva@lemmy.world 139 points 21 hours ago (6 children)

No. Assume every Republican is on the list.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Alteon@lemmy.world 25 points 16 hours ago (6 children)

My concern is that neither side has released a list because its going to be insanely ugly. Like the most powerful people in the US....and the fallout is going to be anarchy.

I have to believe that Biden's team looked at what the fallout would look like, and their reaction was "Oh....my....god. What they did was fuckjng horrific, but the country will literally implode if we release this."

I'm all for releasing it, we need a bit of a hard reset/wake up call.

[–] RaoulDook@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago

Well what you're deciding to believe about that is just wrong. Members of the Biden administration did assist (D) senator Wyden's investigation into wire transfers of billions of dollars to Epstein, which is still ongoing and he has published a list of dozens of names that he found records of financial involvement with Epstein. That investigation which Biden staff cooperated with is being blocked by Trump's staff currently.

[–] Rekorse@sh.itjust.works 5 points 8 hours ago

The country won't explode, it will destroy the pedophiles legacy and future though, which is death to them. Nearly everything biden does is do gaslight people into thinking he was a great person.

[–] mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca 6 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

people need to treat not releasing the info as though the files have the worst possible contents

hard reset is definitely needed

[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 1 points 7 hours ago

Not Bernie! [sigh] Release them anyways.

[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 3 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (1 children)

Releasing the list is damage control.

The Epstein list is really just a focusing lens of much greater rage at billionaires and the elites that cover for them. They either throw some meat to satiate the wolves at their door or the wolves will want to come for them all. Americans are too American to admit their rage is all really about wealth inequality.

[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 1 points 7 hours ago

Interesting point of the day

[–] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 10 points 12 hours ago

Apparently it is safer to leave these blackmail compromised people in powerful positions.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 105 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

So, what we need is the list from the victims read into record by AOC or the like. That's all I'd trust.

[–] papertowels@mander.xyz 30 points 19 hours ago

AOC and MTG, side by side, reading from the same document. Just AOC alone would let conservatives shrug off every consequential name.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 49 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) (11 children)

Do it now and no one gets held accountable.

Do it after republicans start prosecution of the Dems and it becomes much harder to bury the whole thing.

Plus, it gets rid of a shit ton of problematic Dems. If they were raping kids with Epstein, they're also doing way worse shit to prevent that from coming out.

That was the whole point, accumulate dirt, then blackmail.

In 2026 only one party will be able to say zero incumbents were named in the Epstein list, and every republican incumbent has to defend not holding their peers accountable, or even personally being on the list themselves.

trump trying to use corrupt Dems as sacrificial lambs is going to bite him in the ass

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] BigMacHole@sopuli.xyz 66 points 21 hours ago

Good! The LAST thing we Would want is for Republican Child Rapists to be CAUGHT! PROTECT THE REPUBLICAN CHILD RAPISTS!

[–] SeeMarkFly@lemmy.ml 47 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

An easy solution is to not redact anything.

This is ONLY a problem if the guilty are in charge.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›