this post was submitted on 06 Sep 2025
437 points (99.5% liked)

Political Memes

9372 readers
2596 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
all 49 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Rai@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 hour ago

God bless! Ezekiel 23:20!

[–] AntiBullyRanger@ani.social 3 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 54 minutes ago)

The problem is worse that folks are not aware off:
xiaq has been talking to robots all this time.

[–] RushLana@lemmy.blahaj.zone 382 points 7 hours ago (3 children)

Context :

8 May his days be few; may another take his place of leadership. 9 May his children be fatherless and his wife a widow. 10 May his children be wandering beggars; may they be driven from their ruined homes. 11 May a creditor seize all he has; may strangers plunder the fruits of his labor. 12 May no one extend kindness to him or take pity on his fatherless children. 13 May his descendants be cut off, their names blotted out from the next generation. 14 May the iniquity of his fathers be remembered before the LORD; may the sin of his mother never be blotted out. 15 May their sins always remain before the LORD, that he may blot out their name from the earth. 16 For he never thought of doing a kindness, but hounded to death the poor and the needy and the brokenhearted. 17 He loved to pronounce a curse— may it come back on him. He found no pleasure in blessing— may it be far from him.

[–] MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Forgive my ignorance, in this context, who is "he"?

Like, what kind of person is being discussed in this passage?

Mostly just curious. But not curious enough to tarnish my Google search history by looking it up.

[–] Akrenion@slrpnk.net 8 points 1 hour ago

It's a psalm that wishes bad on those who oppose you and the love you give. Basically a disstrack on all your enemies.

[–] LapleMeaf@lemmy.world 103 points 6 hours ago (3 children)

I read an embarrassing amount of that before I realized those were verses and not dates.

[–] musubibreakfast@lemmy.world 7 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

That's one hell of a month

[–] Jerkface@lemmy.world 3 points 1 hour ago

1 April just kidding

[–] _stranger_@lemmy.world 5 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (1 children)

I read the whole thing like Sarah Connor and it was quite cathartic to imagine it being recited like a history lesson. That would be a hell of a week Couldn't happen to a more fitting person

[–] jaybone@lemmy.zip 4 points 2 hours ago

I first read Sarah Connor as Sean Connery and went back to read it in his accent.

[–] flightyhobler@lemmy.world 11 points 5 hours ago

It was 2 for me.

[–] Luci@lemmy.ca 169 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Next May is gonna suck for that guy

[–] toynbee@lemmy.world 11 points 5 hours ago

Maybe that's what NSYNC was referencing in that one song.

[–] Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works 17 points 5 hours ago

Doing the Lords work. Hope you shower after browsing those platforms.

[–] DagwoodIII@piefed.social 126 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

The Bible is like the Constitution. You don't have to read it to know it's meaning.

And I'll add the "/s" because it's 2025

[–] cygnus@lemmy.ca 88 points 6 hours ago (3 children)

The four horsemen of things people on the internet don't read, but still comment about endlessly:

  • The Bible
  • The US constitution
  • 1984
  • Whatever article is in the OP
[–] threeonefour@piefed.ca 37 points 6 hours ago (4 children)

I actually read 1984 because of all the "literally 1984" memes. It's dry but it does hold up surprisingly well.

I never finished it. The protag was a weird horny misogynist. And though he had fundamental problems with the state of the world, he was too cowardly to do anything to counter it except to sneak around fucking some nympho chick, and, in fact, was derisive of those who actually do rebel against it. The dystopia of it was interesting, but the narrative was not remotely engrossing and often insufferable after the initial world building, at least up the point I dropped it. Maybe it got better towards the end, but I've read a synopsis of it since then and it doesn't really seem like it. Not my cup of tea.

[–] CountVlad47@feddit.org 16 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

It kinda reads like Orwell wanted to write an essay on the subject but thought it would get a larger audience if he wrote it as a novel. I read it about twenty years ago and even back then it was terrifying just how many of the predictions had already come true.

[–] DagwoodIII@piefed.social 1 points 2 hours ago

"Stand On Zanzibar" has entered the chat.

The author of the novel, John Brunner, read Alvin Toffler's books and wrote a science fiction novel based on them. It won the Hugo Award for Best Novel in 1969 and it's scary how many of the predictions came to pass

[–] a_person@piefed.social 5 points 4 hours ago

Same, I actually really enjoyed it as a dystopic book. It might have been dry but the storytelling was great.

[–] silasmariner@programming.dev 8 points 6 hours ago

As a thought experiment I guess.

Not very good as a novel, though. Same as Aldous Huxley, the characters barely exist, it's just a platform for pontification. Give me George Eliot or William Faulkner any day of the week.

[–] friend_of_satan@lemmy.world 11 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

Everybody has enough time to read the constitution. Also 1984 isn't too long. The bible though? I went to church for 20 years and most people couldn't make it through the whole thing. It certainly doesn't help that like the first half of it is boring as hell. (I say that as somebody who got so bored with it I also have never read it through.)

[–] cygnus@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 hours ago

The Jefferson Bible is a great way to read the NT without needing to spend too much time with it or roll your eyes at the supernatural bits.

[–] 9bananas@feddit.org 7 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (1 children)

the first half is boring??

that's where all of the super juicy stuff is!

[–] piefood@feddit.online 1 points 1 hour ago

Getting through Leviticus or Numbers is such a slog. There's some juicy stuff in there, but the record-keeping parts get real old, real fast.

[–] twice_hatch@midwest.social 4 points 6 hours ago

I would read articles if they wanted to be read lol

[–] logicbomb@lemmy.world 10 points 4 hours ago

People make solemn oaths to defend the Constitution without being required to read it. It's just insane.

[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 22 points 5 hours ago (3 children)

Fun fact: Psalm hexing is a thing, in certain religions, like hoodoo and voduin.

[–] Tangerine@scribe.disroot.org 1 points 20 minutes ago* (last edited 7 minutes ago)
[–] victorz@lemmy.world 3 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Let's make that a thing of more religions.

[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 1 points 4 hours ago (2 children)

I used to share that perspective, but my perspective has been tempered, as I just said elsewhere, but you're not beholden to my current perspective, as I also said, just prior.

[–] victorz@lemmy.world 2 points 39 minutes ago (1 children)

This was a bit confusing. Mind just sharing your current perspective?

[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 1 points 5 minutes ago

Some blend between https://github.com/nrrb/tao-te-ching/blob/master/Ursula%20K%20Le%20Guin.md#31

and

https://bhagavadgita.io/chapter/2

But wrt the Gita (or any other mythos), understanding not everything is meant to be taken so literally.

Here's my earlier comment: https://kbin.earth/m/hopeposting@lemmy.world/t/1850742/-/comment/8712086

[–] Lushed_Lungfish@lemmy.ca 6 points 4 hours ago

Marking this down for my own future reference.

[–] Ron@zegheteens.nl 34 points 7 hours ago (3 children)

Most so called Christians have never read the bible, if they did they instantly became Atheists.

[–] piefood@feddit.online 2 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

LoL, that's literally how I left Christianity to become an Atheist

[–] Zagam@piefed.social 7 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

There's a difference between Christians and Bible enthusiasts.

[–] Ron@zegheteens.nl 11 points 6 hours ago (3 children)

There shouldn't be, if you live by "the book" you should know "the book".

[–] Zagam@piefed.social 1 points 42 seconds ago

Yeah. I agree. But the fact that we have to use "shouldn't" here pretty much sums it up. I think it may be time for Christians to start thinking about if they have a responsibility to noting the difference.

[–] xylol@leminal.space 2 points 2 hours ago

The unwritten book of the road

[–] Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works 5 points 5 hours ago

Hey I watched the movie with Charles Heston. I'm good bro.

[–] MadMadBunny@lemmy.ca 12 points 7 hours ago

There’s gotta be a bit of critical thinking too

[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 9 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Trump and Vance make quite the wit.

[–] gnutrino@programming.dev 6 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (1 children)

They certainly are a pair of shining wits as Dr. Spooner would say.

[–] zurohki@aussie.zone 5 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

I thought they meant the two of them added up to one full wit.

[–] monotremata@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 hour ago

I'm pretty sure gnutrino was making a different, second joke. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spoonerism