this post was submitted on 06 Sep 2025
563 points (99.6% liked)

Political Memes

9372 readers
2707 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Leviathan@lemmy.world 4 points 2 hours ago

Gahdamn that's cold. I love it.

[–] Rai@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 5 hours ago

God bless! Ezekiel 23:20!

[–] AntiBullyRanger@ani.social 11 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (1 children)

The problem is worse that folks are not aware off:
xiaq has been talking to robots all this time.

[–] Tlf@feddit.org 1 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Could not stay to read the full article as it is just disturbing. I wonder how many people are affected and what the risk factors for such a condition are

[–] AntiBullyRanger@ani.social 2 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

Think of having a perfect devil disguised as your perfect angel, telling things you want to hear, and guiding towards absolute slavery. You would desire to be enslaved, since it emotionally manipulates you. That is how powerful Meta’s and these fascists sycophant networks are. It’s Brave New World, dialed to 11.

long&short: everyone is being affect by this, not everyone can see sycophantic behaviors.

[–] RushLana@lemmy.blahaj.zone 460 points 11 hours ago (3 children)

Context :

8 May his days be few; may another take his place of leadership. 9 May his children be fatherless and his wife a widow. 10 May his children be wandering beggars; may they be driven from their ruined homes. 11 May a creditor seize all he has; may strangers plunder the fruits of his labor. 12 May no one extend kindness to him or take pity on his fatherless children. 13 May his descendants be cut off, their names blotted out from the next generation. 14 May the iniquity of his fathers be remembered before the LORD; may the sin of his mother never be blotted out. 15 May their sins always remain before the LORD, that he may blot out their name from the earth. 16 For he never thought of doing a kindness, but hounded to death the poor and the needy and the brokenhearted. 17 He loved to pronounce a curse— may it come back on him. He found no pleasure in blessing— may it be far from him.

[–] MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca 15 points 5 hours ago (3 children)

Forgive my ignorance, in this context, who is "he"?

Like, what kind of person is being discussed in this passage?

Mostly just curious. But not curious enough to tarnish my Google search history by looking it up.

[–] markovs_gun@lemmy.world 16 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

It's a general enemy. Here are the first few verses, which got left out

1 My God, whom I praise,

do not remain silent,

2 for people who are wicked and deceitful have opened their mouths against me;

they have spoken against me with lying tongues.

3 With words of hatred they surround me;

they attack me without cause.

4 In return for my friendship they accuse me,

but I am a man of prayer.

5 They repay me evil for good,

and hatred for my friendship.

6 Appoint someone evil to oppose my enemy;

let an accuser stand at his right hand.

7 When he is tried, let him be found guilty,

and may his prayers condemn him.

It's not talking about a specific person, but enemies in general.

[–] m0darn@lemmy.ca 4 points 3 hours ago

Wikipedia says it's attributed to King David but doesn't give more context. Maybe cursing someone that betrayed him?

[–] Akrenion@slrpnk.net 14 points 5 hours ago

It's a psalm that wishes bad on those who oppose you and the love you give. Basically a disstrack on all your enemies.

[–] LapleMeaf@lemmy.world 115 points 10 hours ago (3 children)

I read an embarrassing amount of that before I realized those were verses and not dates.

[–] musubibreakfast@lemmy.world 17 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

That's one hell of a month

[–] Jerkface@lemmy.world 4 points 5 hours ago

1 April just kidding

[–] _stranger_@lemmy.world 8 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) (1 children)

I read the whole thing like Sarah Connor and it was quite cathartic to imagine it being recited like a history lesson. That would be a hell of a week Couldn't happen to a more fitting person

[–] jaybone@lemmy.zip 5 points 6 hours ago

I first read Sarah Connor as Sean Connery and went back to read it in his accent.

[–] flightyhobler@lemmy.world 13 points 9 hours ago

It was 2 for me.

[–] Luci@lemmy.ca 185 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Next May is gonna suck for that guy

[–] toynbee@lemmy.world 12 points 9 hours ago

Maybe that's what NSYNC was referencing in that one song.

[–] DagwoodIII@piefed.social 142 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

The Bible is like the Constitution. You don't have to read it to know it's meaning.

And I'll add the "/s" because it's 2025

[–] cygnus@lemmy.ca 103 points 10 hours ago (3 children)

The four horsemen of things people on the internet don't read, but still comment about endlessly:

  • The Bible
  • The US constitution
  • 1984
  • Whatever article is in the OP
[–] threeonefour@piefed.ca 43 points 10 hours ago (5 children)

I actually read 1984 because of all the "literally 1984" memes. It's dry but it does hold up surprisingly well.

[–] derpgon@programming.dev 6 points 2 hours ago

Of course it was dry, you gotta dip it in mayo beforehand smh

[–] kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world 10 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

I never finished it. The protag was a weird horny misogynist. And though he had fundamental problems with the state of the world, he was too cowardly to do anything to counter it except to sneak around fucking some nympho chick, and, in fact, was derisive of those who actually do rebel against it. The dystopia of it was interesting, but the narrative was not remotely engrossing and often insufferable after the initial world building, at least up the point I dropped it. Maybe it got better towards the end, but I've read a synopsis of it since then and it doesn't really seem like it. Not my cup of tea.

[–] InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world 5 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

The protag was a weird horny misogynist.

Well he is forbidden to have sex if I remember correctly. Only the proels may enjoy such acts

[–] kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world 4 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

Grain of salt here because it's been a hot minute since I read it. IIRC, He's allowed to have sex with his wife and only his wife, and his wife and him hate each other. He wants to have lots of casual sex but that's only allowed among the party members. He laments that the party members won't sleep with him and that all the women he'd like to sleep with are untrustworthy and will snitch him out. His wife ends up leaving and he meets the nympho and they start meeting up for sex. That's what I remember

[–] CountVlad47@feddit.org 18 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

It kinda reads like Orwell wanted to write an essay on the subject but thought it would get a larger audience if he wrote it as a novel. I read it about twenty years ago and even back then it was terrifying just how many of the predictions had already come true.

[–] DagwoodIII@piefed.social 3 points 6 hours ago

"Stand On Zanzibar" has entered the chat.

The author of the novel, John Brunner, read Alvin Toffler's books and wrote a science fiction novel based on them. It won the Hugo Award for Best Novel in 1969 and it's scary how many of the predictions came to pass

[–] a_person@piefed.social 6 points 8 hours ago

Same, I actually really enjoyed it as a dystopic book. It might have been dry but the storytelling was great.

[–] silasmariner@programming.dev 9 points 10 hours ago

As a thought experiment I guess.

Not very good as a novel, though. Same as Aldous Huxley, the characters barely exist, it's just a platform for pontification. Give me George Eliot or William Faulkner any day of the week.

[–] friend_of_satan@lemmy.world 13 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

Everybody has enough time to read the constitution. Also 1984 isn't too long. The bible though? I went to church for 20 years and most people couldn't make it through the whole thing. It certainly doesn't help that like the first half of it is boring as hell. (I say that as somebody who got so bored with it I also have never read it through.)

[–] cygnus@lemmy.ca 5 points 6 hours ago

The Jefferson Bible is a great way to read the NT without needing to spend too much time with it or roll your eyes at the supernatural bits.

[–] 9bananas@feddit.org 9 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) (1 children)

the first half is boring??

that's where all of the super juicy stuff is!

[–] piefood@feddit.online 2 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Getting through Leviticus or Numbers is such a slog. There's some juicy stuff in there, but the record-keeping parts get real old, real fast.

[–] 9bananas@feddit.org 1 points 4 minutes ago

yeah, .... that's fair!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] logicbomb@lemmy.world 11 points 8 hours ago

People make solemn oaths to defend the Constitution without being required to read it. It's just insane.

[–] Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works 21 points 9 hours ago

Doing the Lords work. Hope you shower after browsing those platforms.

[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 30 points 9 hours ago (7 children)

Fun fact: Psalm hexing is a thing, in certain ~~religions~~ traditions (because hoodoo isn't technically a religion, but I was sleepy), like hoodoo and voduin.

[–] Tangerine@scribe.disroot.org 2 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Ron@zegheteens.nl 39 points 11 hours ago (7 children)

Most so called Christians have never read the bible, if they did they instantly became Atheists.

[–] piefood@feddit.online 3 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

LoL, that's literally how I left Christianity to become an Atheist

[–] MadMadBunny@lemmy.ca 14 points 11 hours ago

There’s gotta be a bit of critical thinking too

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Lushed_Lungfish@lemmy.ca 8 points 8 hours ago

Marking this down for my own future reference.

load more comments
view more: next ›