Emphatically uncensored:
this post was submitted on 16 Aug 2025
399 points (93.3% liked)
Greentext
6960 readers
1088 users here now
This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.
Be warned:
- Anon is often crazy.
- Anon is often depressed.
- Anon frequently shares thoughts that are immature, offensive, or incomprehensible.
If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Oi! You got a permit for that uncensored meme?
Was that necessary?
Who in the actual fuck censors a 4 Chan post
A 4CHAN POST
Not like 'murca where you have to register your photo ID in order to fap.
Huh? It's that way in some states but wasn't it recently made that way in the entire UK?
The irony of this image being censored .
No swearing license
You have to verify your age to see the uncensored image.
drinks verification can
It's an older meme, sir. But it checks out. We were going to let it pass.
Especially since cunt isn't even a swearword in English.
My wife just told me otherwise.
load more comments
(3 replies)
I can't believe the TV license is real. I just can't. I guess it helps makes good tv tho
Americans fund public TV and radio infrastructure through taxes, Brits just make it opt-out if you meet certain criteria by labeling it as a license.
You tell me which has more "freedom."
The one where I don't have to upload my I.D. to watch porn, BABY! 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🦅🦅
I'll just leave this here https://worldpopulationreview.com/state-rankings/porn-site-verification-states
Sometimes I forget how much freedoms we have in Washington State. The only thing is strict gun laws, but it's mostly background checks and limited magazine sizes
well I live in Georgia (US state) who brought it in before the UK did.
The TV license is definitely real. All the others are fake though (I believe).
A TV Licence costs £174.50
Wtf is this in addition to paying for cable/satellite?
Nope. You can just plug your TV into the aerial to get BBC + free channels. Netflix and whatever costs extra tho
I’m surprised that according to the website, they actually let you get away without a license if you only use commercial streaming services and don’t watch any BBC content. In Germany, that excuse doesn’t fly. As long as your device has the capacity to receive aerial broadcast, you have to pay, whether you watch it or not is irrelevant.
load more comments
(2 replies)
I mean we have free over the air TV here in the states too, just don’t need a loicense for it
load more comments
(3 replies)
The long knife prohibition is real.
The early idea was to support the state-owned and state-operated channels through taxes. Then the channels got privatized and now the taxes are going straight into the pockets of The Brexit Bunch. I mean why would they voluntarily cut off a money source that people were already paying.
In San Diego they had a toll bridge.. once it was paid for they kept the toll. When asked why they were still charging a toll... They said the toll booths still cost money to run. They had to be sued for the toll to stop
Having to charge toll because they need money to run the toll booths is the most Kafkaesque thing I have heard in a while.
This is/was a thing in many other European countries too.
In Austria it used to be (not long ago, a few years at most) that only people who owned a TV needed to pay it, not anymore, now every household has to pay it, so it is basically a household tax.
It's not a tax tho? At least not in Germany. It's going directly to the state-broadcasting service but unconditionally; the idea being it's harder to influence the content or threaten them with cutting off their funding.
load more comments
(1 replies)
Pretty accurate, all my butter knives are unregistered
Yes, constable. This bloke right here.
Br*t self-censorship LOL
Who is Bobby?
British colloquial term for constable
is that the same as gendarme?
Your uncle.
load more comments
(2 replies)
view more: next ›