this post was submitted on 11 Sep 2025
96 points (95.3% liked)

politics

25566 readers
3093 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I don't understand CNN's site. As the link takes you to the top story and the Johnson story is 3 down but with now way to link to it directly

top 27 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] JigglySackles@lemmy.world 4 points 1 hour ago

Fuck all them dead kids in schools. But one political looney gets shot....fuck these ghouls. Preferably in the neck from 200 yards away.

[–] yesman@lemmy.world 9 points 9 hours ago

Kirk had an experienced security detail backed up by campus police. All thwarted by a ubiquitous weapon wielded competently.

[–] ChonkyLincoln@lemmy.zip 14 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

They’d have a lot more moral integrity if they all had to stand unguarded in front of their constituents and answer questions routinely and openly.

Doesn’t the fact they need armed guards speak volumes about their actions against the people?

[–] FabledAepitaph@lemmy.world 9 points 11 hours ago

Right? Maybe these politicians need to step back and address the important issues, like what's causing people to want to shoot them in the first place?

[–] wizbiz@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 10 hours ago

They are now spending money on their security instead of something else horrible

[–] xenomor@lemmy.world 50 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

I’m confused. These fuckers are doing everything possible to increase the number of firearms out there because that makes us all safer. So, what’s the problem. Furthermore, don’t these fuckers have the protective ring of Jesus fire because of their blinding faith? So, what’s the problem? Furthermore, isn’t it all just part of god’s plan if something happens to them? Who do these arrogant shit stains think they are to fight god’s will?

[–] Pacattack57@lemmy.world 1 points 48 minutes ago

You do understand. The gums are meant to get educated liberals killed. Not conservatives. When it happens to them it’s a problem.

[–] BlueEther@no.lastname.nz 10 points 19 hours ago

all good points, except that the 'others' are all satin's spawn and have to be eliminated at all costs

[–] ExtremeDullard@piefed.social 84 points 21 hours ago (4 children)

Read REPUBLICAN lawmakers.

As people lose money to tariffs, lose their Medicaid coverage, get snatched off the street by masked Gestapo-like thugs and locked up without due process, and become more desperate, a lot of them will want a go at the sonsabitches congresscritters and senators who voted for this shit that's happening in their lives.

If I was a Republican anything, even a local politician, I'd be scared right now.

And you know what? I'm struggling to find a violin small enough to express how bad I feel for them.

[–] blacklisted@lemmy.org 41 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (1 children)

They didn't care about extra security when the Minnesota murders happened. Evil fucks.

That Kirk was killed in front of a crowd was for the best, unfortunately. His artery was severed, and he bled out on stage. His death cannot be discarded as an abstraction. He was shot dead in front of a crowd, and it was recorded.

[–] snooggums@piefed.world 14 points 19 hours ago

Apparently Grok is denying it because AI is always wrong about anything significant.

[–] HuskerNation@lemmy.zip 41 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

I live in a very small town, a very red town. The amount of people from friends and family posting rip This means war, etc etc, I've already lost most the friends in my life during Trump's first term. About to lose a few more. wife and daughter are about my only social circle left.

I have to be very careful with what I post on other social media oherwise I'd most likely lose my job and be blacklisted from the community with no funds to move. Fuck I hate it here.

I really just want to scream fuck him in the town square

[–] xyzzy@lemmy.today 20 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

You really need to get out of there. We might have to retake that town someday.

[–] HuskerNation@lemmy.zip 23 points 20 hours ago

Would love to. My wife and I make more money now than we have at any point in our lives and we have almost nothing to show for it and we've worked full time with no layoffs for 30 years and have each only changed jobs once. . We don't spend frivolously we just don't save well and when we do it always seems something comes up and wipes out our bank account, health, vehicle, etc.

[–] ExtremeDullard@piefed.social 7 points 20 hours ago

I would move out.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 8 points 20 hours ago

Read REPUBLICAN lawmakers.

That's so often the case when the "liberal media" uses generic milquetoast terms like "lawmakers" and "Congress" and "Washington", etc....

Very often this is a reference to REPUBLICANS, but the media is either nutless or just straight-up collaborating in the both-sides narratives.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 22 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

LOL, no kidding. They know how unpopular they and their shitty agenda really are.

No matter how much and for how many decades they and the "liberal media" have been telling everyone that this country "leans conservative".

[–] AmidFuror@fedia.io 3 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

People were afraid of the Manson Family too. Having assassins on your side doesn't make you the majority. As it turns out, there were enough people OK with Trumpism to re-elect him.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 5 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

The "liberal media" denies it at nearly every turn, but Americans do and have polled progressive on the issues for decade upon decade. But their narrative is that Democrats should move further to the right to appease the supposed "conservative majority".

[–] Auli@lemmy.ca 1 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Maybe the progressives should vote consistently. It doesn't matter how the country leans if they do t vote. The right block is the only one who consistently votes so it is who the parties target.

[–] BakerBagel@midwest.social 1 points 9 hours ago

Who are progressives supposed to vote for? The fascist ghouls who want to turn the US into a theocratic kingdom? Or the neoliberal ghouls that are pillaging society for everything is worth to cater to the fascists? The Democrats can only claim "this is the most important election of our lives!" so many times before people realize they have no intention of making anything better. Progressive voters have been systemically disenfranchised for the past 50 years and told to vote or else

[–] aubeynarf@lemmynsfw.com 1 points 15 hours ago

maybe the “progressives” should field a “candidate” that can earn more than 0.8% of the “popular vote”.

[–] BigMacHole@sopuli.xyz 15 points 19 hours ago

Guns are ONLY Safe around LITTLE CHILDREN! OTHERWISE they're DANGEROUS!

[–] Nougat@fedia.io 14 points 19 hours ago

Fear. They feel the fear they deserve to feel. Because of the actions of a singular person.

Would that we all took steps to make them feel fear.

[–] Bonesince1997@lemmy.world 17 points 21 hours ago

Charlie's is freed up. I hear they're stellar!

[–] BlueEther@no.lastname.nz 4 points 19 hours ago

Think of the children:

"They’re exposed all the time, everywhere. We have great security measures for members of Congress, but there’s a desire on many people’s parts to have more.”

Johnson added on “The Source” that he is looking into that request, saying, “We have to take serious measures for serious times.”