this post was submitted on 03 Jan 2026
505 points (99.4% liked)

politics

29122 readers
2858 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The Senate will vote next week on a bipartisan war powers resolution to block Trump from continuing military against Venezuela — a vote that takes on heightened importance after U.S. forces attacked the South American nation and arrested President Nicolás Maduro early Saturday.

The resolution to block the administration from engaging in further hostilities against Venezuela is privileged, which means Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-S.D.) cannot stop it from coming to the floor.

The measure is sponsored by Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (N.Y.), Sen. Tim Kaine (D-Va.), Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) and Sen. Adam Schiff (D-Calif.).

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] JeeBaiChow@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago

They literally kidnapped the president and proceeded to threaten the replacement. They don't care.

[–] TomMasz@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago

Why "hurry"? He won't stop anyway.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 2 months ago

Fucking useless

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Already happened, ineffectual shitbags.

[–] floquant@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

What's the issue stopping them from meeting today or tomorrow? They can't clear their golfing schedule to do their job and address whether what the president did represents the will of the nation?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Formfiller@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago

Seems a little late there Schumer

[–] nonentity@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 months ago (4 children)

The US has been a nation no-one should treat as a serious entity since 2024-11-05, and will not be again until they can prove their ability to hold another legitimate election.

Right now it’s a coin flip as to whether I’ll see that within the remainder of my lifetime.

[–] Tehbaz@lemmy.wtf 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

The US should be completely isolated from the rest of the world, until they hold new and fair elections monitored by international observers; and join the ICC to have their past & present leadership held accountable for war crimes.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] boaratio@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

Good luck dickheads.

[–] ieGod@lemmy.zip 3 points 2 months ago

Bit too late for that.

[–] OpenPassageways@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 months ago

If they wait until it's over, then they don't have to look powerless when Trump ignores Congress.

[–] Windhover@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

Interesting choice of photos.

[–] SulaymanF@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Here’s the problem as I see it. Trump, Hegseth, and Rubio are deeply overconfident. Trump’s former ambassador was telling BBC that Venezuela is much easier than Iraq. Trump fell into the same mistake as Bush did of thinking the president is unpopular and that the outside opposition is all set to swoop in and replace the government and give Trump everything he wants in oil. This is too tantalizing. The problem is that the new government is not stable, patriots and nationalists and pro-Maduro pro-army forces will resist and fight a foreign occupation. Trump thought he could skirt the problems of Iraq by doing only airstrikes and wrapping up the whole conflict in less than 60 days (so that Congress can be cut out of the whole thing).

Rebels can sabotage the oil lines, that means the need for troops to protect the oil. That will go longer than the 60 day limit; so either Trump will have to find another military or ask Congress for authorization. Trump will likely force Congress to go along; Republicans are too scared to cross Trump and Democrats are afraid of being labeled unpatriotic for not going along with it. The fact is that Dem leaders are being silent on this. The only good take I’ve seen is Graham Platner issuing a statement about how illegal this whole thing is, not defending Maduro or sounding unpatriotic.

Long story short, Congress will meekly go along with Trump’s war as a fait accompli. Nobody wants to be painted as anti-troops or pro-drugs or whatever Republicans will smear them as.

[–] Wilco@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Weird. I thought only Congress could declare war. It seems that the way it really works is anyone can declare war without Congress by kidnapping foreign leaders and then the Senate has to vote to tell that person to stop.

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

then the Senate has to fail to vote to ~~tell~~ ask that person to stop.

[–] Wilco@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 months ago

Yep, this is what happened. I cannot believe I exist in the same reality with people this corrupt and people stupid enough to follow them.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›