this post was submitted on 13 Jan 2026
406 points (100.0% liked)

politics

27262 readers
2702 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 40 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] shittydwarf@piefed.social 70 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] Fredselfish@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Can we get list that site is way to slow?

[–] errer@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Seriously it’s like a CSV, the data itself is prolly distributable on a floppy disk. There should be half a dozen mirrors by now.

[–] wheezy@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Yeah. This is kind of sus to me. I'm kinda feeling like this is a means of collecting data on the people trying to access the site. I just can't believe that someone that actually wanted to leak this info would this incompetent. This could literally be posted to a pastebin. Or, ya know, a torrent if it includes images. Something is sus.

[–] mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca 3 points 6 days ago

I'm doing my part by giving them one more name on the list of people accessing it

what are they going to do to me, I'm not in the US

[–] shiroininja@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago

The government is blocking the site

[–] motruck@lemmy.zip 1 points 6 days ago

Your multiple sus comments are sus.

Near as I can tell no one has seen it.

[–] Lasherz12@lemmy.world 55 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Lots of spouses and children finding out their dad is even more of a piece of shit than they suspected today. I hope they're all able to avoid the obvious domestic abuse that will ensue when the population most likely to be domestic abusers get outed. Hopefully that may also mean a lot of them go to jail tonight, but let's be honest, their record showing this only makes them more likely to be selected by DHS as an applicant.

[–] zd9@lemmy.world 26 points 1 week ago

I would LOVE to see some research group look up all of the violent charges of these ICE goons and plot that against the general public. That would be beautiful.

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 44 points 1 week ago (1 children)

They need to release this as a torrent. A website is too easily taken down.

[–] wheezy@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Could literally have been posted on GitHub, Pastebin, 1000s of different hosting sites free and anonymous. If this is literally just text data. Something is sus about the way this was released.

[–] shiroininja@lemmy.world 10 points 6 days ago

GitHub would remove it in an instant. Dont trust the Microsoft oligarchy to stand up to the government Lmao.

I know the org they gave it to. They do good work. Yes, a torrent should be made. Yes, their ICE wiki is still vulnerable even though it’s hosted overseas. In fact, American users stopped being able to reach the site last night without a vpn. It’s being blocked in America

[–] AfricanExpansionist@lemmy.ml 25 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (4 children)

I hope someone eggs their houses and scares their spouses

[–] Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works 17 points 1 week ago

Better to paint ICE on the front door for everyone to see (best to do so in ICE cosplay and keep that mask up)

[–] zd9@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago

Sure, and while I'm at it I'll pour molten gold in their keyholes

[–] tino_408@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago (2 children)

This is an extremely bad idea. Most of this people have guns at home. Just stay safe everyone.

[–] AfricanExpansionist@lemmy.ml 13 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Yo this dork has never egged a house

[–] Bronzebeard@lemmy.zip 9 points 1 week ago

In this economy?!

[–] tino_408@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

lol I have definitely egged a house before. But if I knew the home owner had a good chance of owning a gun especially when hostility is floating in the air I probably wouldn’t be here today to type this

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

if i was egging someone wish a firearm, i'd use the slingshot and egg from 300 yards away

[–] moody@lemmings.world 2 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Nobody is launching an egg with a slingshot. Maybe some of the yolk would hit the target, I guess, but you'd get way more egg on yourself.

I mean I've done it but go off king

[–] tino_408@lemmy.world 0 points 6 days ago

This is the stupidity we are dealing with. 🆙 this dude thinks an egg can fly 300 yards lol

[–] kieron115@startrek.website 9 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

guns don't do a whole lot against molotov cocktails thrown at 3 in the morning, just saying. not advocating for violence, just pointing out that guns at home tend to cause more fatalities to their owners/family than they do save people from a home invasion.

[–] tino_408@lemmy.world -2 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Let’s think this out lol you think more people clean there guns/handle them more then people break in? And suggesting another weapon is definitely advocating violence. It’s like telling someone suicidal not to find the gun in the house. Your opinion is stupid and scary

[–] kieron115@startrek.website 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2025/03/05/what-the-data-says-about-gun-deaths-in-the-us/

Though they tend to get less public attention than gun-related murders, suicides have long accounted for the majority of U.S. gun deaths. In 2023, 58% of all gun-related deaths in the U.S. were suicides (27,300), while 38% were murders (17,927). The remaining gun deaths that year involved law enforcement (604), were accidental (463) or had undetermined circumstances (434), according to CDC data.

If there were 17,927 gun-related murders, 463 accidental deaths, and 434 undetermined deaths, then the numbers speak for themselves. Guns don't protect your home. Chances are whoever is breaking in just wants your fuckin TV. If they really intend you harm the numbers say they're gonna have the advantage.

[–] tino_408@lemmy.world -1 points 6 days ago

Notice how they don’t mention how many robbers are deterred from robbing a gun owners house. It’s almost like most gun owners don’t get robbed 🤔

[–] foggy@lemmy.world 20 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Anyone got a mirror? Sites effectively hugged to death rn.

[–] roux404@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It’s been down since this morning. Seems more like a coordinated effort to make sure nobody sees that list

[–] foggy@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It isnt down. It's just overwhelmed.

I have a few pages open currently, but they've all taken many requests.

[–] roux404@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Ah ok thank you for letting me know.

[–] Arghblarg@lemmy.ca 18 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Archive: https://archive.is/ivmTa

Edit: seems the capture didn't fully work. Hope someone got it all.

[–] Tehbaz@lemmy.wtf 14 points 1 week ago

Carve a swastika into their foreheads.

[–] huquad@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Any mirrors? Site is getting death gripped harder than me later tonight