this post was submitted on 15 Jan 2026
401 points (99.8% liked)

politics

27262 readers
2944 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

While older members of leadership in the House and the Senate are retiring, some from the Silent Generation say their seniority is still a boon for their districts.

Former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, 85, is heading for the exits after nearly four decades in Congress. So is her longtime deputy, Rep. Steny Hoyer, 86, and former Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, 83.

But of the two dozen members of the Silent Generation now serving in the 119th Congress, more than half (13) have decided to run again in 2026, according to an NBC News review.

In total, this Congress is the third-oldest in U.S. history, with an average age of 58.9 years at the start of this session one year ago. The median age in the U.S. is 39.1.

all 36 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 50 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (5 children)

At every age, there should be a cognitive test to qualify for public office at each election, at every level, including local.

Fetterman had a stroke in his early 50s, which left him impaired. It's not only about age, and age doesn't necessarily mean one is impaired. Bernie is doing fine, and I suspect several of the over-80's running for office now are fine, too. But, not all of them.

Age is not a strong enough determiner of mental impairment to disqualify one from running for office, it's just a convenient one. This isn't an argument for the status quo, there are better ways, and we should use those, instead of age.

EDIT: Furthermore, if you want actual change and aren't just here to bash on old people because they're old, you need to realize that since Congress IS populated by old people, and will continue to be so, the chances of passing an age limit law are practically nil. BUT, I suspect some sort of cognitive impairment test could pass. However, since it would need to be a Constitutional amendment, the battle is long and uphill.

Finally, my motivation. I'm 60, BUT I happen to agree that younger people would be better at running the country. Because, younger people are less jaded, and more empathetic. Also, as a Democratic Socialist, I don't want people like Bernie to be unjustly disqualified by age. And, I will happily vote for AOC should she appear on my ballot for any office in the future.

[–] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 25 points 5 days ago (1 children)

For me the main problem is not cognition but the greed and lust for power. Normal people retire to spend time with family, to enjoy their hobbies or to just rest. For those people the only thing that matters is the power they have and the money they can still make. It's fucked up. Look at Europe:

The only people above retirement age are autocrats in Belarus, Russia and Turkey. The desire of American politicians to keep working until they die is not normal.

Just looking at the numbers explains a lot

[–] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 13 points 5 days ago (2 children)

How would you prevent the cognitive test from being used to remove candidates for political reasons?

"Sorry, he failed the test because he couldn't sing the texas anthem"

You could maybe have the questions and answers public, but the voting public is poorly informed and educated.

You could have some sort of third party do it, but then the conservatives would spend decades corrupting that.

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 7 points 5 days ago

Yeah, or just Mississippi having 10 or so cognitive tests and by weird coincidence black people keep getting the really hard ones

[–] ILoveUnions@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago

Yup. Precisely why I advocate for a hard cap on age positioned around 65 rather than any form of test.

I'm a firm believer that the only qualification for elected office should be citizenship.

[–] the_q@lemmy.zip 11 points 5 days ago

I agree with assessing cognitive function, but 70+ year olds should not be involved with any decision making positions. I'm being generous with that 70...

[–] Auli@lemmy.ca 1 points 4 days ago

Term limits simple answer.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 31 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Bill Clinton, lil Bush, and trump were all born in 1946, Biden in 1942.

With the exception of Obama (1961) it's pretty fucking ridiculous we just keep moving the bar up for what an acceptable age is to placitate boomers.

It was bad enough 30 years ago before the dementia set in.

[–] Auli@lemmy.ca 1 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Millenials are the largest voting block so they must love grandparents or something.

[–] myfunnyaccountname@lemmy.zip 13 points 5 days ago

Max age limits for all elected and appointed officials should be tied to the social security retirement age. Once you hit that age, you can finish your term and then fuck right off. Also make the change to the SCOTUS, DOJ…etc. all elected and appointed, term limits, defined terms for those that don’t have them, and age limits. I am beyond tired having senile, dementia patients running the country into the ground.

[–] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 17 points 5 days ago (3 children)

By law, the age limit to serve should match the retirement age, as per the Social Security Administration rules of 2025. So, you cannot run for office if you are 67 or older, and you cannot serve beyond your 70th birthday.

[–] jaybone@lemmy.zip 20 points 5 days ago (2 children)

What a great excuse for them to increase the retirement age…

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 8 points 5 days ago

Right? Talk about setting up a perverse incentive.

[–] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 5 points 5 days ago

I specified that the age requirements match the set by the SSA in 2025. Changing the retirement in 2026 or beyond would not change that.

[–] Cenotaph@mander.xyz 6 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Great, now we just have to convince a bunch of 80 year olds into voting for it 🙃

[–] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 3 points 5 days ago

That's the rub.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I don't get why? As long as people are not cognitively impaired, why should they be prevented from working?

If anything, as science and medical breakthroughs come online, it might be feasible that people can work into their 90s and beyond.

[–] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 7 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Two reasons. First, it's just good policy. You want your representative government to remain representative, especially to those who support the existence of the government, ie those who work and pay taxes. The ideas and the facts of every day life are very different for a 45 year old and a 75 year old. "What about the 25 year old?" you might ask. It is far more likely for a 45 or 55 year old to interact on a regular basis, socially, and at the work place, than it is for a 75/year old to do so. You want people who either live or know people that live the everyday circumstances that affect us all.

Second. The brain shrinkage goes into high gear after the age of 60. Even if you are not obviously cognitively impaired, you are also not at your best, and you never will.

This is a quick search result but there are a lot of other sources. It is well documented.

https://www.brainfacts.org/thinking-sensing-and-behaving/aging/2019/how-the-brain-changes-with-age-083019

This next thing is my life experience, and not in any way meant as proof. My father is a well known and formerly brilliant legal mind. He's argued im front of the Supreme Court multiple times. He has beenan athlete since well before I was born and even though he was also born in the 1940's, he still runs five miles every day. Every, fucking day. He does not have dementia. He does not have Alzheimer's. He will likely outlive me. And yet, I noticed some years ago that he is not sharp. The decline has been especially pronounced in the past decade. Is he still smarter than many? Sure. But he is not the man (had he been in office) that I voted for 20 years ago. He is also, as much as he tries to stay informed with current events, painfully out of touch with the needs of anyone younger than 60 (including me).

[–] Auli@lemmy.ca 1 points 4 days ago

Term limits I don't care about age but term limits would solve so many problems in America.

[–] qarbone@lemmy.world 8 points 5 days ago

These decrepit fucks think all "real" jobs are easy money, so of course they don't care about making retirement a feasible option. They just fall asleep in an air-conditioned hall, rarely stirring awake to thoughtlessly vote down opportunities for citizens -- young and old -- to have a manageable life.

If you forced some of these antedeluvian ulcers in our government's guts to depend on the services they legislate on, then those services might actually become serviceable. Instead, they collect an easy paycheck until they die in-office. Using active office like it's a pension.

[–] watson387@sopuli.xyz 8 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

We need to be getting these geriatric fucks out of the government.

[–] Akasazh@lemmy.world 3 points 4 days ago

Gerontocracy

[–] Auli@lemmy.ca 3 points 4 days ago

You need term limits for senators. Wonder why they only voted that for president. When it was brought up oh so long ago.

[–] Hikermick@lemmy.world 5 points 5 days ago

The Democratic Party needs to learn from the GOP and build a"farm team"

[–] AlexLost@lemmy.world 5 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Get those geriatrics out of politics. They will never let go, they need to be shown the door. Fire the ineffective old geezers and get some new blood in the system.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 3 points 5 days ago

Again, I think people are focusing on the wrong thing.

JD Vance and Marco are "new blood". So is Gaetz. That Nick Fuentes guy is very young. Before he was murdered, Charlie Kirk was very young as well.

I don't want any of that trash running anything.

[–] basket@pie.gravitywell.xyz 4 points 5 days ago

They are all vampires

[–] Formfiller@lemmy.world 3 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

I like Maxine waters and Bernie but the rest can go back to the catacombs

[–] DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works 1 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Can my grandma run? She just became a US Citizen not too long ago, so she could theoretically run.

I mean if Americans are so obsessed with grannies, why don't we do a campaign where my granny runs for congress?

Lmfao.

Edit: Just googled it, apparantly you need to be a citizen for 7 years for the house, 9 years for the senate...

so if my grandma survives 7 more years, she could theoretically run to be a representative...

she'd be like 84 I think

she's hasn't been exactly a kind grandmother to me, but I bet she's still better than a bunch of rich out-of-touch old people

[–] agentant@lemmy.ml 1 points 4 days ago

Tbf, you don't really need much mental capacity left to just rubber stamp whatever your donors tell you to. /hj

[–] CircaV@lemmy.ca 1 points 5 days ago

Gerontocracy.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 0 points 5 days ago (1 children)

This is all the wrong focus, but I expect nothing less than inter-generational hatred to be stoked by the corporate media to make sure people don't have their eye on the ball...

If anything, as lifespan/healthspan gets extended, we'll see even more people that are 80+ in Congress.

[–] ravenaspiring@sh.itjust.works 1 points 5 days ago (1 children)

What would your focus be on?

[–] phdepressed@sh.itjust.works 1 points 5 days ago

Ya know their policies and fighting on the right side of the class war.