this post was submitted on 15 Jan 2026
135 points (98.6% liked)

politics

27262 readers
3032 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

President Donald Trump has repeatedly threatened to invoke the rarely used federal law to deploy the U.S. military or federalize the National Guard for domestic law enforcement, over the objections of state governors.

top 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ExtremeDullard@piefed.social 34 points 5 days ago (2 children)

The orange utan can't wait to do it. He's been exciting the population with his ICE goons for the very purpose of having an excuse to go full dictatorship.

[–] miguel@fedia.io 7 points 5 days ago

It's been literally the point since the very start. Clearly and obviously. I can't wait to hear what justification the courts come up with to defend him.

[–] xploit@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Orangutans are gentle and intelligent creatures, don't let Futurama or some wannabe painted apes fool you.

[–] ExtremeDullard@piefed.social 2 points 5 days ago

Well, I hate to diss them, but they happen to possess two very unfortunate characteristics that make them ideal to refer to the shitstain currently defiling the White House without needing any explanation: they're apes, and they have 5/6th of the word "orange" in their name.

[–] Catoblepas@piefed.blahaj.zone 26 points 5 days ago

One trick pony.

[–] northendtrooper@lemmy.ca 21 points 5 days ago (2 children)

I almost believe that he will enact it anyway to prevent the midterm elections. I would rather prefer he do it now and stop blue balling us. Or worse he pulls this shit in Oct.

[–] A_norny_mousse@feddit.org 10 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

Honestly, I wonder what is keeping them back? Public opinion? Some surprisingly resistant remnant of checks'n'balances?

MAGA has been building up to & drooling over this final chapter for... IDK, ever since Jan 2025 I guess.

[–] ChunkMcHorkle@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

They don't have the military, or rather the critical mass of support within the military that it would take to ensure the new fascist regime's power, and never did. But he's decided to test it anyway.

History proves that, unequivocally, there is NEVER a successful coup without either the tacit or overt support of the military and the secure understanding that if the ruling power wants boots on the ground willing to fight their fellow countrymen, that will happen.

He does NOT have this, but he's decided to call for it and see if it sticks anyway. He's speedrunning this on steroids because he knows it's now or never.

[–] AlecSadler@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

What evidence do you have that he does that's this? Most military people I know support Trump. I have to assume the leadership in the military has been gutted like the IRS, FBI, etc.

I have zero reason to believe the military isn't in lock step.

[–] ChunkMcHorkle@lemmy.world 0 points 4 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

The military is not the FBI or the (well gutted) IRS, it is a worldwide operation with bipartisan leadership that has come up through the ranks. He's come after dissenters at the top, general rank, but I haven't heard of much going on lower than that. In reality the relatively short length of time involved and the vast scope of necessary purging that would be required to remake the military like other government offices suggest that it's just not possible, and instead of hearing about turnover in military leadership what we're hearing in the news is stagnation, and at one point approvals for promotions were not even being processed at all.

I don't know what military people you personally know, or when the last time you asked what their level of support was, but not only is the military full of men and women who have never fired upon their own countrymen, it is full of brown and black people who are now seeing with their own eyes that US citizens who look exactly like they do are being scooped up right along with the undesirables.

I think you forget that he has already threatened the Insurrection Act in multiple instances to post the National Guard, such as in LA, and gotten shot down by the courts. And let's not forget that he was talking about invoking full martial law before the inauguration. He wanted to have this done by last spring, yet it's not. It's not even near, because judges have already thrown the National Guard out of Portland and Chicago, and even more suits are in the works.

To be clear, believe what you want. I do not care about changing your mind. If your own evidence comes down to "you know people" then by all means rely on that. But I do not believe the wider facts support that conclusion at this time.

[–] watson387@sopuli.xyz 3 points 5 days ago

That's the Project 2025 plan.

[–] Tempus_Fugit@lemmy.world 16 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Our city streets are looking more and more like what we did during GWOT. Going door to door kicking them in. Cordon and search has become the SOP of the federal "officers" in our own cities. They shouldn't be surprised when our citizens act like the terrorized Iraqis that were beaten and humiliated. I recommend we start versing ourselves on the Iraqi resistance, IRA, and asymmetric warfare.

[–] fonix232@fedia.io 5 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I mean, the other IRA also had some useful methods of "civil disobedience".

[–] hateisreality@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago

Only need to be lucky once

[–] WoodScientist@lemmy.world 3 points 5 days ago

Why can't the school shooters just switch to ICE? Smite someone who deserves it for once!

[–] ThePantser@sh.itjust.works 9 points 5 days ago

And when the states cut off tax revenue or go on general strike?