this post was submitted on 19 Jan 2026
962 points (99.5% liked)

politics

27262 readers
3600 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Contents of said letter from daily beast: https://archive.is/YFBK3#selection-773.0-779.748

“Dear Jonas,” the president wrote to Norway’s prime minister, Jonas Gahr Støre. “Considering your Country decided not to give me the Nobel Peace Prize for having stopped 8 Wars PLUS, I no longer feel an obligation to think purely of Peace, although it will always be predominant, but can now think about what is good and proper for the United States of America. Denmark cannot protect that land from Russia or China, and why do they have a ‘right of ownership’ anyway? There are no written documents, it’s only that a boat landed there hundreds of years ago, but we had boats landing there, also. I have done more for NATO than any other person since its founding, and now, NATO should do something for the United States. The World is not secure unless we have Complete and Total Control of Greenland. Thank you! President DJT.”

(page 3) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] danekrae@lemmy.world 29 points 1 day ago

I didn't want peace for people, I only wanted the peace prize... If I can't get the peace prize, I will send people to war...

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I mean, sure, that's the worst thing we've seen all week so far. But look - Harris didn't do enough for the proletariat!

So. Y'know. This is the Democrats' fault.

[–] yeahiknow3@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 1 day ago

You gotta put /s or face confusion.

Fun fact, detecting written sarcasm is one of the more, let’s say, rare elements of verbal fluency.

[–] moderatecentrist@feddit.uk 8 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Lemmy.ml genuinely believes this. They will still insist that not supporting Harris was somehow the right decision.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Tolookah@discuss.tchncs.de 28 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] ryper@lemmy.ca 19 points 1 day ago

Also wholly unhinged. The hinges are just gone.

[–] Zugyuk@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago

This reads more like a diplomatic demand in civ 1

[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 22 points 1 day ago (4 children)

A bully will always pick a smaller target. When the world says "No!" the bully will bravely run away.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 19 points 1 day ago

It's easy to tell which ones he's written and which ones his "PR department" has written.

[–] MutantTailThing@lemmy.world 17 points 1 day ago (5 children)

I do not envy the successor who’s going to have to unfuck Americas reputation in the world.

[–] AbsolutelyNotAVelociraptor@sh.itjust.works 17 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I'm not sure it will be unfuckable to be fair. The amount of damage (reputational and whatnot) is so big that the country is right now a banana republic with a toddler autocrat. The only reason people still cater to him is his army. But even for that to keep working, he needs money. And there's a limit to how much other countries can tolerate.

He's dumb enough to not realize the US is drowning in ever-growing debt that other countries could simply cash in and send the whole manbaby imperialist fantasies to hell in a month or less.

[–] Jesus_666@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

He has pretty much torched all of the USA's soft power and standing as a trade partner.

GWB had already done some damage to both, which Obama tried to repair (more so on the trade front). Then Trump I happened and made it very clear that the USA were no longer a reliable partner and probably not even politically stable in the medium term. Biden tried to salvage something but then Trump II happened and conclusively buried what little goodwill the States had left.

I don't think the pax americana is going to survive the decade and neither is the petrodollar. It remains to be seen whether the States will become a local hegemonial power, a failed empire with lasting ambitions á la Russia, or will even fade from relevancy entirely. I don't expect them to remain a superpower.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] A_norny_mousse@feddit.org 9 points 1 day ago

I just read something about this, and it jibes with my own thoughts on the topic:

“There is a shift in U.S. policy and in many ways it is permanent,” according to a senior official with a European government. “Waiting it out is not a solution.

From this politico article

I mean, let's play out the possible scenarios for 2028... I don't see a single one that results in slowly rolling back everything that happened since 2016. And even back then the USA was not the most democratic; it was easier for Europe to not see it back then, but that is not the case anymore.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Brkdncr@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Dude is weird. Is this his normal, is it drug-induced, or is it dementia?

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›