this post was submitted on 20 Jan 2026
453 points (98.3% liked)

Fuck AI

5268 readers
2218 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

AI, in this case, refers to LLMs, GPT technology, and anything listed as "AI" meant to increase market valuations.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] RampantParanoia2365@lemmy.world 80 points 1 day ago (2 children)

...and you posted a picture of a tweet, instead of something with an actual link. I do not understand. I really. Really don't.

[–] Nalivai@lemmy.world 1 points 15 hours ago

So you don't have to go to twatter and give meckahitler your attention

[–] DougHolland@lemmy.world 19 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Thank you for this. It's so common, I sometimes forget to be annoyed.

[–] racketlauncher831@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It's so fucking annoying that I made a post about it.

https://lemmy.world/post/41539483

[–] ptu@sopuli.xyz 9 points 1 day ago

Goddamit thats not the link I’m after either

[–] zbyte64@awful.systems 13 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

VoteYesOrNoAI.com to save others from typing

[–] Jack@lemmy.ca 5 points 17 hours ago

I couldn't find a link to it from DDG's homepage or blog, but a search gave https://duckduckgo.com/vote which redirects to the above.

[–] bonenode@piefed.social 187 points 1 day ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) (7 children)

:D

Edit: 15 hours later it is still 93%. I am getting suspicious this isn't real.

[–] Hawke@lemmy.world 3 points 12 hours ago

It was 94% when I first looked at it a few days ago

[–] SippyCup@lemmy.ml 77 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Well. Glad to see I don't need to bother.

I imagine the cross section of DDG users and people who fucking hate AI is higher than average, but I hope at least that this is somewhat reflective of general public sentiment.

[–] marx@piefed.social 42 points 1 day ago (8 children)

I don't hate AI as a tool. Especially in narrow, high-impact use-cases.

I work in medicine. I have already seen instances of AI, used as a tool by professionals, helping to literally save lives. The applications in medical research (and many scientific fields probably) are genuinely exciting. AlphaFold won a nobel for a reason. Insanely cool projects like the Human Cell Atlas wouldn't be possible without it.

The problem is stupid-ass 'general' chatbots being forced down everyone's throats so corpos can hoover up even fucking more of our data and sell more fucking ads.

Even these chatbots can be useful, but I won't use any that collect data or sell ads.

In this regard I think DDG's approach is pretty reasonable. You can turn on or off, you can use it without an account, and all queries are anonymized before being sent to the model.

I get that people have a reflexive "fuck AI" reaction because of the way it has been deployed in society. I truly understand it. But honestly that's more of a capitalism problem than an AI problem. AI is a tool like a hammer. Just because evil corporate pricks are using it to bash our heads in doesn't mean we should hate hammers, it means we should hate evil corporate pricks.

[–] mushroommunk@lemmy.today 35 points 1 day ago (4 children)

This is where terminology is an issue. Yes Alpha Fold and Chatgpt are both "AI" but they're very different technologies underneath. Most people who say "fuck AI" usually just mean the generative AI technologies behind Chatgpt and Sora and such.

The common person doesn't understand this difference though and probably isn't even aware of AlphaFold.

[–] msage@programming.dev 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Let's all agree to use the term GenAI for chatbots and other bullshit generators.

[–] mushroommunk@lemmy.today 6 points 1 day ago

I asked grok who said the correct term is "MechaHitler"

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] nickiwest@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago

I'm seeing 79,264 votes with the same percentages now.

[–] MrSmith@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Technically, with 93%, it's safe to say, that we all feel the same about AI.

[–] Nanowith@lemmy.world 1 points 16 hours ago

Yeah, the Pro-AI vote is getting close to the lizardman constant.

[–] ChicoSuave@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago (1 children)

70k+ is a good representation of the users. Plenty of data points they can extrapolate and all of them point to scrapping AI. Good. Save some money and skip the slop trough.

[–] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 30 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

It's not a survey. It's an ad. It's an ad for noai.duckduckgo.com. The fact that we're thinking it and talking about it means it was a good ad. But it's just an ad. The numbers are entirely meaningless.

Nothing about this ad says that they are scrapping AI. They aren't. They still provide AI by default. This is a way for the end user to opt out of that default.

[–] piranhaconda@mander.xyz 7 points 1 day ago

I answered yes to see what happened. It tells me "Thanks for voting — You’re into AI. With DuckDuckGo, you can use it privately. Try Duck.ai"

No idea where they're going to take it from here, just wanted to provide some insight on the other option.

[–] ICastFist@programming.dev 20 points 1 day ago

Next up, from DDG:

"Oops, looks like we lost the data of the voting, so we'll just assume YES won because everyone loves Copilot AI, which is the best AI and has nothing to do with us having a contract with Microsoft!"

[–] victorz@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago

Good, maybe now they can make it opt-in.

[–] Jack@lemmy.ca 3 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

I clicked "NO AI", and the result page showed "YES AI Thanks for voting — You’re into AI. With DuckDuckGo, you can use it privately."

Is it because I have cookies off by default, and haven't whitelisted this site for cookies?

Is it because I have NoScript? I had to allow voteyesornoai.com temporarily in order to see anything other than an orange page.

[–] Jack@lemmy.ca 9 points 17 hours ago

Yip, allowing that domain to set cookies correctly showed "NO AI Thanks for voting — You’d rather skip AI. With DuckDuckGo, you can, because it’s optional." after voting.

That's next-level stupid. Do the people at DDG know that cookies can be deleted, or blocked? Was this site made using AI?

[–] callyral@pawb.social 17 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I already use noai.duckduckgo.com but I would rather no AI be the default

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] cecilkorik@piefed.ca 40 points 1 day ago

I like the part where we're now pretending they're "pushing back" on forced AI almost a full year after implementing default, forced AI.

Where was this "norm" a year ago? Did the AI implement itself into DDG's main page by accident? Were they hacked? /s

It's fine that they made a mistake including default AI. But it's long overdue for them to admit that, and have some accountability, and maybe provide an apology, and an explanation. Instead, we get this milquetoast "Some people like it, some people don't, we weren't wrong it must've been you guys who changed your minds, but we're the good guys here, because now we're asking you!" gaslighting.

With all due respect, fuck you, duckduckgo.

[–] ObscureOtter@piefed.ca 71 points 1 day ago (3 children)
[–] jballs@sh.itjust.works 25 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Huh, if you select "No" it gives you an option to go to an alternate DDG homepage "noai.duckduckgo.com". But it looks like if you just go to their normal homepage, they've got a link to DuckAI at the top, searching for images defaults to including AI images, and they have a Search Assist that uses AI as well.

So even though the overwhelming majority of their users have responded "No AI", they're still defaulting everyone to the "Yes AI" experience unless you use an alternate URL. That's kind of shitty. I mean at least they have a "no" option, but seems like it should be the default.

First of all, the vote is from last week, so no measures have been taken yet. The vote is still live.

Secondly I think it was more of an ad for their AI, that backfired, because if I remember correctly, the "no" answer didn't provide the link to noai.duckduckgo.com when I first answered.

Lastly, I hope that this does change some minds in their C-suite. Having no AI as a standard would be a good start, but them filtering AI images is actually a bonus. This should be expanded upon.

[–] DiscoCoffee@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 1 day ago

Maybe this poll is to see if they should switch it to off by default?

The lazy, of course, being OP who went through the trouble to... post a picture instead of anything useful.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] owsei@programming.dev 14 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] DougHolland@lemmy.world 25 points 1 day ago (1 children)

After completing the survey, and of course wanting NO AI, DuckDuckGo of course suggested using their "no AI" search engine, bragging that "We've Turned Off AI‑Assisted Answers" and "We've Removed AI‑Generated Images." The #2 result on my first rather bland search was Grokipedia.

[–] machiavellian@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 day ago

I just had the same experience. The amount of effort it takes to act ethically and stay away from literal stinking piles of toxic waste every time you need to use the computer for anything is insane. Most common browser - AI, search engine - AI, messaging app - AI, phone - AI, TV - AI. And I use the term "AI" quite liberally here at best meaning machine learning and at worst a LLM.

[–] EtherWhack@lemmy.world 38 points 1 day ago

Took them a while. (Probably after countless feedback submissions criticizing it)

Them having it enabled by default actually made me switch off of them. I'm Trying out startpage currently and it doesn't seem terribly bad.

[–] owsei@programming.dev 12 points 1 day ago

BTW you can see the absolute results or broken down by country and US state here

[–] user224@lemmy.sdf.org 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Just a small note, in uBlock Origin there is a blocklist named "EasyList - AI Widgets" that seems to work fine, at least with Google. It also has entries for duckduckgo.com.

[–] Jack@lemmy.ca 4 points 17 hours ago

To get there:

  1. Firefox,
  2. application menu (or from menu: Tools),
  3. Extensions and themes,
  4. to the right of uBlock Origin, click the ...,
  5. Preferences,
  6. Filter lists (at the top),
  7. scroll down to Annoyances,
  8. under EasyList - Annoyances
  9. you can select EasyList - AI Suggestions
[–] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 22 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I find the Kagi implementation interesting. You will only get AI results if you end your query with "?".

"How do I make cornbread" = search results for cornbread recipes.

"How do I make cornbread?" = AI generated recipe response.

[–] errer@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 17 points 1 day ago

No, no, no! The question mark calls the AI slop genie! Now you've done it.

[–] generic_computers@lemmy.zip 6 points 1 day ago

Kagi also has an option to turn that feature off! :⁠-⁠)

load more comments
view more: next ›