When has anyone from his administration been truthful under oath?
When has anyone else actually done something about them lying under oath?
this post was submitted on 27 Jan 2026
191 points (100.0% liked)
politics
28245 readers
1718 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
They aren't just lying, they're actively disdainful of the bodies questioning them. I think they're daydreaming of the point in the coup that they can throw them all in prison for sedition.
At this point half of them are bringing in notes on the interviewers and just lashing out randomly to questions.
Are Senate inquiries ever useful?
According to the standard model of physics they could be, in theory
It's funny this is still announced like some sort of a win. She will have to avoid answering questions for couple hours. Best case she will say something stupid and we will laugh at her. That's it.
There's already mounting calls from the GOP. Not enough, but being a twat in the hearing could sway more for impeachment numbers. There's also a month for her to lose more support before the trial even begins.
The videos are clear and it shouldn't even require her to testify in front of Congress, but I'll take a small victory, regardless of how small, because there aren't many these days.
Have you ever seen any Republican on the stand in the last decade? Being a twat in the hearing is literally what they do.
That's the worst she can do on the stand, and she's already not liked by gop members of Congress. I'm not saying there will be consequences directly from this, but I don't think anything she says will benefit her position and may turn more conservatives against her. There were already more calls today for her firing. Again, not good enough, but pieces are moving. Bovino losing his position, ICE allegedly moving out of MN to at least some degree... Small steps in the right direction. This battle isn't a sprint.
Exactly this. I imagine the exact same type of response we received from Bondi except with an added bonus of a marble-mouthed Midwest accent escaping from slobbery overinflated lips.
March 3rd, what, full schedule till then? More important things going on for the Judiciary Committee??
She won't testify. She will show up, say she can't answer some questions, say she doesn't recall, claim 5th amendment rights, then make speeches.
No recourse
Congress can use her refusals as reasons to impeach. Impeachment doesn't need to follow the same rules nor evidence as a court.
ICE doesn't have until March, what fantasy do they live in?
Kristi Noem is a lying liar who lies and kills dogs
Yeah I’m sure we’ll get to the truth now.
This is the part where she pulls off her mask and was Steven Cheung all the time. To Lewandowski’s horror.
For an official making false public statements over and over again, a phrase like "lock-her-up" seems appropriate.
I hope she is not as arrogant or venemous as bondi, but they're the same picture. I'm sure she has her little paper of insults for defending herself already prepared by lil' Steve Miller.
March 3!? There will be atleast 18 more dead by then, if not 100s