913
If any group has zero rights, all it takes to remove anyone's rights is attaching them to that group.
It's an all or nothing thing
this post was submitted on 28 Jan 2026
913 points (99.7% liked)
politics
27959 readers
2735 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
If one of us us chained, none of us are free.
You don’t understand liberty until someone speaks for yours.
-N.E.R.D., Drill Sergeant
Your constitution is worthless when you have an executive branch that doesn't care about it while having an overly loyal majority support of the legislative and judicative branch.
It also takes complicity from the "opposition" party. Even with the loyalty of the legislative and judicial branch their actions should be moderated by the balancing quality in the Democratic process of "turn around is fair play".
Meaning that you don't want to do anything that gives grounds for your opposition to copy if they were to get into power. The problem being that the DNC has shown itself to not have a spine, equating tit for tat politics as beneath their dignity.
load more comments
(9 replies)
It was been by rich white men for rich white men.
So, if we ignore that 4th amendment violation and note how often this administration violated the 1st amendment, I will note that 1 + 5 + 6 + 13 = a 25th amendment solution.
You can't argue that math! (Literally, it can't be argued with!)
I won't argue with you on that math.. but unfortunately the pedophile certainly can argue against the 25th... he is unfortunately livid enough to deny it.
Livid, or lucid?
Either way, there isn't anyone in the executive with a spine, so the 25th is never going to happen, anyway.
The only way the fascist pedo will be removed is via impeachment and force, or on Jan 20, 2029, but again likely by force. And the only way impeachment would happen is if Dems get a majority in the House (could happen) and exceed 2/3 majority in the Senate which is unlikely to happen.
There is another way. God has the final veto on his performance, after all. Perhaps He will send His Last Cheeseburger soon, to redeem us all.
*hamberder
God
That has as much likelihood of existing (and caring) about as much as there being a next (fair) election.
Not lucid, but no one who has the legal power to invoke it wants to threaten what they're getting from him staying in position. It's not just Trump; I'd say that he isn't the real problem, just a symptom allowed to persist because of the rot elsewhere.
load more comments
(1 replies)
Ah yes lucid. Im too livid to be lucid enough to use correct terminology. Thanks.
load more comments
(2 replies)
"Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable." -JFK
This shit will happen every day from now on until something is done about it- and complaining doesn’t seem to be the solve.
I hate to admit this but I'm terrified to go beyond complaining. I don't want to have to fight these fucking ghouls. But I guess the pool of options is evaporating.
Don't fight these ghouls. They are a symptom; oligarchs are the disease.
Register your complaint with the richest person within driving distance.
load more comments
(1 replies)
I feel ya. But doing noting hasn’t really moved the needle much. Complacency teaches repetition.
load more comments
(22 replies)
load more comments
(1 replies)
Maybe we should twerk in the street some more and keep begging Democrats.
/s for fuck's sake.
load more comments
(19 replies)
"I don't know whether they're incompetent or if they chose to do this, but it's not good."
In my local jail, it can take up to a week to be able to call someone but typically more like 3 days. This is because the phones in the holding cells are often broken, so you need to wait until after bail is set and you go upstairs, and then they charge money to make the calls. Meaning, if you don't have an account already set up, you're going to have to wait until someone is willing to show you how to set it up. That's just for regular criminal issues.
When someone requests an attorney, all questioning stops dead. If they continue on, it becomes fruit of the poisonous tree.
Believe it or not but most cops aren't as virtuous as Stabler and don't have a pretty blonde DA around to challenge them over what they would be willing to do to seek justice. And a "good" attorney can often work around that.
But also, that doesn't change anything. From skimming the article, it sounds like he wasn't being interrogated without a lawyer. He was just being left to languish in confinement. Which... is how the us legal system "works".
This is less "ice are bad" and more "all cops are bastards"
If they continue on, it becomes fruit of the poisonous tree.
so just shoot them or strangle them in holding. That's what is going on.
load more comments
(2 replies)
load more comments
(1 replies)
Why even talk about any constitution when your government doesn't care about any laws?
If they don't obey laws neither should we
To none Americans, mentioning someone professionally killed for the US, is not the win it’s supposed to be
And those who "served in combat" is even worse.
Fuckers think it's a admirable thing to go to other countries and kill innocent civilians.
load more comments
(2 replies)
Left out 1st and 2nd
Lets just accept that none of these people know what a person rights are. Even if they do they know they don't have to honor them. Their denial of basic rights make them criminal but once again no lawful agency will act to stop it. In these circumstances there will eventually be a massacre. One that no lawful agency will act on except to punish those that are not state supported participants.
They want a civil war thinking that they can kill half of us and still have a functioning country.
load more comments
(12 replies)