this post was submitted on 31 Jan 2026
490 points (96.8% liked)

politics

27959 readers
2735 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

“How’s the Democratic Party’s ground game in Pennsylvania?” I asked a friend several weeks before the 2024 presidential election. He replied optimistically that there were far more door knockers this year than in 2022.

It turned out these door knockers were just urging a vote for the Democrats without putting forth a compelling agenda attached to candidate commitments on issues that mean something to people where they live, work, and raise their families. There was no Democratic Party “Compact for the American People.” Then-President Joe Biden visited Pennsylvania, which went Republican, many times, with his most memorable message being that he grew up in Scranton.

...

Their aversion to building their own momentum to answer the basic questions “Whose side are you on?” and “What does the Democratic Party stand for?” remains as pathetic as it was in 2022 and 2024.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Formfiller@lemmy.world 23 points 3 days ago (2 children)

It’s because they’re traitors

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)

It's so fucking crazy to see liberal Dems get on their soapbox about how "you can't talk about dual loyalty, that's antisemitism" and then show up at an AIPAC conference in Israel Flag pajama pants with an open checkbook to the US Treasury

[–] Bakkoda@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

What's worse is if you add it all up, it's not even a decent lotto jackpot. The US sold the last bit of soul for pennies.

[–] Pure_Psykosis@lemmy.ca 6 points 3 days ago

This motherfucker even looks evil.

[–] Gates9@sh.itjust.works 19 points 3 days ago

How many times does the Democratic Party leadership have to create new and inventive ways to steal defeat from the jaws of victory for it to form a clear composite picture of collaboration?

[–] anon_8675309@lemmy.world 44 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Democrats: At least we’re not republicans.

Yeah that’s not enough

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 22 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Since trump got elected that seems to be all they have. Biden, like him or not, actually had some decent policy. Yes, yes…could have done a lot better, but it was more than “we’re not trump”.

But since trump won? They’ve caved on pretty much everything.

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

It's all they ran on in 2024 and also during Budens admin.

And it wasn't good enough then either.

[–] Mulligrubs@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago (2 children)

They're not "cowards" as much as they are doing the job that they are paid to do by their "donors".

Schumer has made a fortune! Pelosi's family is set for generations! And so on.

Politics are the third easiest way to become wealthy in the USA (easiest being inheritance, second easiest prosperity gospel preacher).

[–] KeenFlame@feddit.nu 1 points 2 days ago

..which is cowardly

[–] AntiBullyRanger@ani.social 0 points 2 days ago

Stay* wealthy.

[–] SnarkoPolo@lemmy.world 12 points 3 days ago

They'll still be wagging their finger and expressing concern while they're being beaten and hauled off to a private prison.

[–] bagsy@lemmy.world 33 points 4 days ago (1 children)

They are already winning, they have all the campagn contributions they need. Why would they do anything different.

Citizens United will be the death of the USA.

[–] DylanMc6@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 4 days ago (4 children)

How do we overturn Citizens United

[–] OshagHennessey@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

Since it's a Supreme Court ruling, it would take another SC ruling or a constitutional ammendment to override it.

[–] lofuw@sh.itjust.works 9 points 4 days ago (1 children)
[–] OshagHennessey@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Expand the Supreme Court. It's not even a radical idea. We have one SC justice for every superior court circuit. The number of circuits has grown, the number of justices hasn't, and there's no reason they can't or shouldn't, except that it'd dilute the donors' power.

[–] bagsy@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago (1 children)

congress and the senate would have to make s new law snd the president would have to sign it.

[–] derg@lemmy.world 6 points 3 days ago (11 children)

Citizens United isn't a law, it's a Supreme Court ruling which has its (flawed) logic based on the Constitution. A law won't cut it, because Citizens United would be used as precedent to strike it down as unconstitutional. We likely need a new Supreme Court ruling or constitutional amendment.

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] SoleInvictus@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

The people it benefits would have to decide to not benefit from it anymore.

So not likely unless the alternative is even worse.

[–] ClassStruggle@lemmy.ml 43 points 4 days ago (6 children)

Their purpose has never been to win but to defend the status quo and prevent leftist organizations and movements from gaining positions of political influence and power that may threaten that status quo.

[–] AntiBullyRanger@ani.social 1 points 2 days ago

Ignore me comrade, came 🧵 to react.
mern

Though I have witnessed liberals&Democrats in threadiverse go completely silent the past few days. We know why🤭

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Ghyste@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 days ago

Ahh, yes. Gotta get that no-vote agenda rolling again: it's an election year!

[–] Etterra@discuss.online 10 points 3 days ago

The Democratic party is such a pussyfest (negative).

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 13 points 4 days ago

It's long past time for the MAGA comedy act of Schmuck & Jeffries to get the hook, and get dragged off-stage. They are 50% of the reason that Trump is president again.

Imagine if we let Hitler off the hook, and then allowed him to take power again a few years later? These dipshits did that.

[–] OshagHennessey@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Priority 1: Get all Republicans out of government seats; they've proven they can't be trusted with power. Vote Democrat so the candidate you vote for had a solid chance to win.

Priority 2: Hold the elected Democrat accountable, tell them what you expect from them. If they won't serve you, vote in someone who will.

Priority 3: If you're capable of it, research how to get your name on your local ballot(s) and start campaigning. If no candidate is willing to represent your interests, be the candidate to represent those interests and you'll have an easy campaign.

The donors are scared shitless that we'll realize WE have the power of government in our hands, and as long as one person equals one vote, that will always be the case. Every change they want is designed to undermine the fact that one person equals one vote, no matter how much money they have.

[–] the_crotch@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago

Term limits, for every office. One term. No value in buying a candidate that will be gone in 2/6 years.

[–] MadBits@europe.pub 7 points 4 days ago (2 children)

People have to understand that Republicans and Democrats are the same thing, its the same serpent which bites its own tail. Its controlled opposition.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›