this post was submitted on 31 Jan 2026
412 points (99.3% liked)

politics

27959 readers
2875 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Judge Fred Biery lambasts Trump’s ‘ill-conceived and incompetently-implemented’ mass deportation campaign

A federal judge has ordered the release of a five-year-old boy and his father who were detained by federal immigration agents from their driveway in suburban Minneapolis and sent to a detention center in Texas.

In his ruling on Saturday, District Judge Fred Biery delivered a brutal assessment of Donald Trump’s mass deportation campaign and an “ill-conceived and incompetently-implemented government pursuit of daily deportation quotas” that appears to require “traumatizing children.”

Liam Conejo Ramos was taken into federal custody from the driveway of his family’s home last week after officers arrested his father Adrian Alexander Conejo Arias, who is seeking asylum in the United States. They were sent to an Immigration and Customs Enforcement detention center in Texas, where the preschooler is reportedly sick, lethargic and asking for his mother, according to his family and lawmakers who visited him this week.

The judge condemned the administration’s apparent “ignorance of an American historical document called the Declaration of Independence” and Thomas Jefferson’s warnings against “a would-be authoritarian king over our nascent nation.”

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] whereIsTamara@lemmy.org 60 points 4 days ago (1 children)

How can you tell you’re in a republicans house? The bible still has shrink wrap.

[–] FoxyFerengi@startrek.website 13 points 4 days ago (1 children)

That or the pages are littered with paragraph-long highlights, underscores, and "THIS!!!" in the margins but no critical thought or insights on the passages

[–] ThePowerOfGeek@lemmy.world 10 points 4 days ago

And all those notes and the heavily-read pages are in the Old Testament portion, while the New Testament portion is barely touched.

[–] robocall@lemmy.world 12 points 3 days ago

Other outlets say he has been released, along with his dad

[–] mkwt@lemmy.world 41 points 4 days ago (3 children)

This is, uh, this is not how judges normally sign off on opinions:

[–] j0j0@lemmy.world 26 points 4 days ago

He's trying to add every single bit of gravitas to his order

It's amazing, tbh, one thing I didn't expect from this entire situation is that the judiciary starts to really flex their literary and theatrical muscles in their authority, because while most legal business is rote ritual, they take advantage of that with this, and allow their legal opinions and the weight of their urgency to be seen

It gives me a little hope

[–] ShaggySnacks@lemmy.myserv.one 13 points 3 days ago

Normally, no. However it does humanize Liam Conejo Ramos as a child. The judge isn't talking about some child that the public can't visualize. We actually get to see what Liam Conejo Ramos looks like.

[–] muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Are you suggesting it’s inappropriate?

[–] mkwt@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

No. I am suggesting that these times are abnormal.

[–] muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 days ago

I have to wonder if they really are, or if Trumps regime is just so terrible at optics that we are seeing all the rot they been hiding behind the curtain for years.

He’s not smart enough to amass this much power this fast. He’s not rich enough. He’s not influential enough.

He stole something someone shouldn’t have had in the first place.

[–] 51dusty@lemmy.world 45 points 4 days ago (2 children)

the date on the order is 2/31/2026..... 🤦

[–] deacon@lemmy.world 18 points 4 days ago

It only adds to the sense that he was quivering with barely restrained rage as he wrote the order, which also came through in the text quite nicely I thought.

[–] FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca 10 points 4 days ago
[–] cosmicrookie@lemmy.world 7 points 4 days ago (2 children)

It's game over when a judge quotes the Bible...

This is becoming Christians Sharia law

[–] kamikazerusher@lemmy.world 37 points 4 days ago (24 children)

Judge Fred Biery was appointed by Clinton and actually blocked the 2025 state law that would otherwise have required displaying the 10 Commandments in public classrooms.

I see this as him pointing out to Trump’s supporters that the actions of this administration are not only inhumane but run contrary to core Christian teachings. If the “pro-Christian” administration isn’t being very Christian then call out their hypocrisy.

load more comments (24 replies)
[–] ameancow@lemmy.world 12 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I feel like the people balking at the christian tone and quotes in this order haven't actually paid a single moment of goddamn attention to anything for the last several centuries in the USA.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Gathorall@lemmy.world 4 points 4 days ago (9 children)

Yeah, the Bible should not enter legal documents and a judge seemingly taking guidance from it should be disbarred.

[–] ameancow@lemmy.world 20 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (2 children)

Calm the fuck down when people are doing the right thing.

Jeez I swear we will lose every battle ever because leftists are always seeking places to snatch defeat from the jaws of victory.

Edit: reminder people, there are very real agents against better outcomes who are paid to make these kinds of takes to make people like us, the ones opposing fascism, to argue and fight about stupid shit like this. It's objectively stupid to argue that a judge who did a good thing and is fighting for liberty be disbarred for slipping two bible references in his signature, it's nonsense.

So more likely than not, this user is one of the many, many trolls from troll farms across the world dedicated to making people fight each other, not the powers that want to shove ALL of you in a camp. Clap them back but then block and move on. There are too many impressionable people here who will read a whole thread of back and forth and despair that they don't know who's right.

[–] MadBits@europe.pub 4 points 3 days ago

Well said, thank you!

[–] laranis@lemmy.zip 1 points 3 days ago

Not caring "how" while being okay with the "what" is how we are losing the rule of law. I echo OP's sentiment on the importance of the separation of church and state. A judge citing the Bible should be discouraged, even if we agree with his ruling. Sounds like he was trying to point out the hypocrisy of Trump's rhetoric, but even that, I'd argue, is not his role.

[–] mineralfellow@lemmy.world 16 points 3 days ago (7 children)

He quoted “Jesus wept.” Hardly inappropriate.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] MadBits@europe.pub 10 points 3 days ago (4 children)

Indeed, let's return a 5 year old child to jail because the judge said a few words from the bible. Grow the fuck up. I grew up in a very conservative Christian family, I never was a believer myself but I do respect each ones beliefs as long as they don't bring any harm.

Wishing for a 5 year old child to return to jail because the judge said a few bible phrases is absolutely macabre.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Gates9@sh.itjust.works 11 points 3 days ago (3 children)

Perhaps, but, I won’t complain about Christian theology being used against Christofascists, of which I suspect many ICE agents are. Donald Trump has been known to wave a Bible around. Turnabout is fair play.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] curiousaur@reddthat.com 9 points 3 days ago

Have you read the Jefferson Bible? He took all the magic shit out so it's just Jesus the moral philosopher.

[–] merdaverse@lemmy.zip 7 points 3 days ago

Leave it to militant atheists to be more concerned about fighting religion than about fighting fascism

[–] athatet@lemmy.zip 6 points 3 days ago (3 children)

And why are you making multiple comments about it? Give it a rest already.

[–] habitualcynic@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago

I think it’s cute how mad this guy got lol. Wait til he finds out ICE murders people.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

The regime uses religion to justify ignoring legal norms. The judge knew exactly what he was doing. Basically, even if the Bible matters more than the law, this is STILL wrong.

[–] Eheran@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

I agree. It does not matter if it was used in a good way this one time. Next time might be against abortion.

[–] hector@lemmy.today 3 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Appeals courts will overturn. The patriotism of some of the district court judges does not seem to apply to higher courts. Or state courts for that matter fuck them all

load more comments
view more: next ›