this post was submitted on 03 Feb 2026
364 points (96.7% liked)

Microblog Memes

10493 readers
3033 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

RULES:

  1. Your post must be a screen capture of a microblog-type post that includes the UI of the site it came from, preferably also including the avatar and username of the original poster. Including relevant comments made to the original post is encouraged.
  2. Your post, included comments, or your title/comment should include some kind of commentary or remark on the subject of the screen capture. Your title must include at least one word relevant to your post.
  3. You are encouraged to provide a link back to the source of your screen capture in the body of your post.
  4. Current politics and news are allowed, but discouraged. There MUST be some kind of human commentary/reaction included (either by the original poster or you). Just news articles or headlines will be deleted.
  5. Doctored posts/images and AI are allowed, but discouraged. You MUST indicate this in your post (even if you didn't originally know). If an image is found to be fabricated or edited in any way and it is not properly labeled, it will be deleted.
  6. Absolutely no NSFL content.
  7. Be nice. Don't take anything personally. Take political debates to the appropriate communities. Take personal disagreements & arguments to private messages.
  8. No advertising, brand promotion, or guerrilla marketing.

RELATED COMMUNITIES:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 45 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] joelfromaus@aussie.zone 7 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Somehow I’m both too good and not good enough to meet the criteria to join.

[–] LadyMeow@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 2 hours ago

Yeah, like I’m maybe a 5, but my car works fine, so…hmmm

[–] sparkles@piefed.zip 6 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

“Older, can afford to see why the check engine light is on”

[–] _stranger_@lemmy.world 6 points 3 hours ago

It's^free^at^autozooooone

[–] blazeknave@lemmy.world 4 points 4 hours ago

I call those moments, "what do women see in me?"

[–] WhyIHateTheInternet@lemmy.world 4 points 5 hours ago

Shit I already convinced some poor girl to marry before smart phones but I'll keep it in mind

[–] ViperActual@sh.itjust.works 4 points 5 hours ago

Damn sign me up.

Does it count if my truck's check engine light came on but it got fixed because I figured out the gas cap wasn't screwed on tight enough?

[–] ArbitraryValue@sh.itjust.works 60 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (8 children)

"Like a strong 7" is about as reliable as "6' 0" tall" as self-evaluation in the context of dating.

If 5 is average and 10 is "celebrity known for being beautiful, dressed up and wearing full makeup" then probably one in ten people is a 7 or higher. For the record, I'm 5' 11.5" and a 4 on a good day. My marketing pitch is "Below average but not so much so that people stare."

[–] Naz@sh.itjust.works 8 points 3 hours ago

I propose a new dating website:

"5 and below"

Everyone caps at 5, and if you're over, you get banned :}

[–] _stranger_@lemmy.world 4 points 3 hours ago

Just make the scale logarithmic, but it starts at 7 in the middle, like the PH scale.

[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

This is going way, waaay back... but basically...

For cishets at least:

Men tend to actually use pretty close to a standard normal distribution based around the actual midpoint, and actually use the entire scoring range.

Women tend to not do this, at all, and instead have a heavily biased or skewed way of using the scoring range.

(Where I mean bias and skew in their statistical definitions, primarily.)

Women only rate 19% of men as being average or better. Women also very often say they consider and talk to and date men who they view as not in their league.

And thats not like, a spurrious result from only one early dating app. There are many studies and published analyses that consistently show that women tend to be very picky or choosy or harsh or however you want to say it, tend to rate very few men as very attractive, compared to how men rate women as very attractive.


So, to apply this kind of data to your hypothetical on the 1-10 scale, doing a rough conversion for the 1-7 scale here:

Basically, if you are a man rating women, well you can see that 21% of women are rated 6/7 or 7/7...

... but if you are a woman rating men, the amount of men rated 6/7 or 7/7 is 2%.

That is to say, men find roughly 2 out of 10 women to score 7 or higher, whereas women find roughly 0 out of 10 men to score a 7 or higher, on a 1-10 scale.


This kind of data is also a literal foundational reason why all modern dating apps work the way they do.

[–] saltesc@lemmy.world 2 points 4 hours ago

I was 5'11.5" but after a motorcycle accident and leg surgery, I'm 6' on my right leg.

[–] orbitz@lemmy.ca 2 points 4 hours ago

That was pretty much my thoughts on reading it. Then I realized, that sort of described the plenty of fish site, unsure if still around, went on a few dates from that (guess that shows my range and age) and had fun. Well more fun than not.

[–] Skua@kbin.earth 34 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

I would assume that this is an IGN-style scale where it's functionally 5-10, not 1-10. 7 is average, 5 is terrible

[–] fleem@piefed.zeromedia.vip 10 points 9 hours ago

anything below 5 is cringe but 3 or below and its abject horror

[–] dharmacurious@slrpnk.net 2 points 6 hours ago

It's not.

Source: am a 2

[–] peopleproblems@lemmy.world 2 points 5 hours ago

Look take that 6'0" comment back. I am 6'

In shoes

[–] aeronmelon@lemmy.world 3 points 8 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 8 hours ago (1 children)
[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

... please score 'Hungry Hungry Hippo' hungry on a scale of 1 to 10, 10 being absolutely famished and actively starving to death, 1 being so full that you already fell asleep from a food coma.

[–] Mac@mander.xyz 5 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

Hi

Edit: nvm

[–] U7826391786239@lemmy.zip 20 points 10 hours ago (4 children)

categorizing everyone into a pseudo-objective 1-10 attractiveness scale and saying "depressed is good!....but only fun depressed [whatever tf that means]" ... is a red fucking flag

yea i know it's a joke.

but is it really?

[–] Asafum@lemmy.world 3 points 2 hours ago

saying “depressed is good!..but only fun depressed [whatever tf that means]”

I think it has something to do with the saying "the clown is often the saddest person in the room." So they want someone who is just sad enough to always be making jokes or trying to be funny. I recognize myself in that at least. I tend to always be looking to make people laugh even if I'm kinda miserable inside every day.

[–] Mac@mander.xyz 8 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Everyone knows the correct scale is 0-1.
You're either interested or not.

[–] somethingsomethingidk@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

We talking integers or real numbers?

[–] Mac@mander.xyz 1 points 5 hours ago

Integers are real numbers.

[–] peopleproblems@lemmy.world 2 points 5 hours ago

Look at this guy full of wisdom. Get out of here

[–] Speculater@lemmy.world 3 points 7 hours ago

Well we know which kind you have. /s

[–] dx7@piefed.social 5 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

There's one already called Tinder. It's exactly what you said.

[–] skeezix@lemmy.world 21 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

It wouldnt fly because all those people want to date a 10.

[–] Mac@mander.xyz 3 points 6 hours ago

It's not my fault that all women are 10s.

[–] slacktoid@lemmy.ml 12 points 10 hours ago

Or that's my definition of a 10?

[–] Entertainmeonly@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

My check engine light came on two days ago. I feel called out😋

[–] surewhynotlem@lemmy.world 2 points 6 hours ago

On the bright side, you seem more attractive now

[–] Valmond@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 10 hours ago

Out of a hundred?

/J

[–] Asafum@lemmy.world 6 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Damn I meet the rest of the criteria except I'm probably a 3 on a good day lol

[–] Mac@mander.xyz 0 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

This is a goddamn lie and you know it.
Try again.

[–] Asafum@lemmy.world 3 points 2 hours ago

True, I'd probably fix the check engine light.

[–] eestileib@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 9 hours ago

I can assign how I'm doing on a numerical scale and looking at the percentage of the people I'm trying to look good for respond positively.

If it's about 50%, I'm at a 5.

I've been told this is very regressive and patriarchal, oh well.

[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 3 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Who decides who's a 7 though? Maybe others think I'm a 10 on a good day, and a 1 on a depressed day. Maybe I'll just want to lay in bed and cry and eat fried chicken. Maybe the next day I'll want to fuck Halle Berry and Angelina Jolee. You know Angelina would SO be down for face-sitting, and I bet Halle gives one nervous mediocre blowjob, where she's not quite sure what she's doing, but she's hot so nobody is complaining.

And maybe by Friday I'll want to walk down the streets naked eating nachos. But fuck it's too cold out there! Mr Winky would shrink! I wouldn't even NEED to be in the pool!

What were we talking about?

[–] miked@piefed.social 2 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

ADHD was not on the ok list!

[–] Mac@mander.xyz 2 points 6 hours ago
[–] Eat_Your_Paisley@lemmy.world 2 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

Who dates a person that has the CEL on in their car

[–] SCmSTR@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 9 hours ago

I have a rat car and even that car's cel isn't on anymore because the bulb burned out in the dash. Good ole Toyotas.

[–] miked@piefed.social 2 points 9 hours ago

idk cuz I have multiple warning lights on in my car. I know exactly what they mean but... depression keeps me from getting them fixed .