this post was submitted on 04 Feb 2026
91 points (100.0% liked)

politics

27908 readers
2918 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

With the deadline to file for reelection a little over a month away, two of Utah’s Republican members of Congress are asking a federal court to block the use of new U.S. House districts that could significantly boost Democrats’ chances of winning a Salt Lake City area seat in November.

A lawsuit filed late Monday by U.S. Reps. Celeste Maloy and Burgess Owens and nearly a dozen local officials contends a state judge violated the U.S. Constitution last year when she rejected congressional districts drawn by the Republican-led state Legislature and instead imposed an alternative map submitted by groups suing the Legislature.

The U.S. Constitution and Utah Constitution both give redistricting powers to the state Legislature, the lawsuit asserts, and “courts have no authority to draw a congressional map.” The lawsuit contends Utah’s districts should revert to those last approved by the Legislature in 2021, unless lawmakers come up with new ones.

Utah is one of several states still locked in legal battles over House voting districts ahead of the midterm elections this fall.

top 3 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] bradinutah@thelemmy.club 8 points 2 hours ago

Celeste Maloy and these other Republicans have to cheat to win instead of convincing voters and winning on the merits, character, and issues. She won't have a seat unless its gerrymandered. The real issue is that Prop 4, which passed by statewide election to bring about the end of this gerrymandering, is by the Voice of the People which she and the Rs do not respect. This is a power grab and it's simply evil. Having the people choose their own Reps on a fair playing field simply gives power back to We the People. They love to make a strawman argument and attack it relentlessly because talking about the real issue reveals their villainy.

[–] tlekiteki@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago) (1 children)

Very interesting. I reseached this for over half an hour.

Utah legislation has that right, not a judge. (U.S. Cons 1.4)

Should a Federal Court be handling it rather than, say, Supreme Court of Utah? Nowhere in section 4 is that mentioned. Actually

The Supreme Court of Utah did rule that the legislature illegally disregarded a Referendum. Right to referendum is guaranteed by the Utah Constitution since 1900.

The funniest detail fs that the referendum only required the Utah legislature to vote on the map proposed by the independent commission. These grabby boomers could have just voted no, but instead they had a tantrum and are trying to repeal the very right to have a referendum.

A useful summary: https://www.abc4.com/news/politics/inside-utah-politics/proposition-4-map-c-special-sessions-redistricting-timeline/

[–] tlekiteki@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 hour ago

TLDR its already been decided by Supreme Court of Utah and the `Republicans´ are trying to cheat