this post was submitted on 11 Feb 2026
612 points (98.0% liked)

Technology

81467 readers
4712 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

https://commet.chat/

@commetchat@fosstodon.org

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[โ€“] unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de 56 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

I was immediately gonna comment "but does it support element-call" and to my surprise:

Supporting both, 1:1 calls over WebRTC, and voice channels with MatrixRTC + LiveKit

So to my knowledge this is the first client thats not an element fork that supports the new call system ๐ŸŽ‰

Looks like it was added only a week ago, so maybe there will be some bugs, but still im very happy to finally see this in an independent client.

[โ€“] Blisterexe@lemmy.zip 8 points 6 days ago (1 children)

afaik both fluffychat and cinny support it, but they don't advertise it well.

[โ€“] unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de 9 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

FluffyChat from my testing just now only supports the legacy 1:1 p2p calls not the new element-call system (here called MatrixRTC + LiveKit) that supports large group calls and performs much better. I dont think cinny supports it either if i look at their changelogs from the last year.

MatrixRTC + LiveKit

[โ€“] Blisterexe@lemmy.zip 5 points 6 days ago (1 children)

That's emberrassing, I misread people talking in an issue about an open pr (https://github.com/cinnyapp/cinny/pull/2599) with them talking about an existing feature. That pr does seem reasonably close to landing though.

[โ€“] unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

Ooh nice to see, thanks for the link. Once all the major matrix clients support livekit, matrix will be much more recommendable imo. Element works okay on a modern computer, but it really is insanely bloated when you look at what other clients achieve with less than 1/10th of the application size.

[โ€“] Blisterexe@lemmy.zip 5 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Agree, not a big fan of element's interface either. Imo the point where matrix will be widely recommendable is when matrix 2.0 is done and widely adopted. Stuff like sliding sync is really important too

[โ€“] unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

To me a major issue (besides the client feature parity) right now is history sharing in encrypted rooms being non functional. At the moment when you invite someone new to an encrypted room, they wont be able to read the historic messages in it, even if you specifically toggled that on, because the toggle currently doesnt do anything after the old insecure implementation was removed. They are working on it and its probably not super far away, but currently you basically have to use unencrypted rooms if you want new people to be able to see old messages.

https://github.com/element-hq/element-meta/issues/2829

[โ€“] wavebeam@lemmy.world 13 points 5 days ago (2 children)

the UI of discord is not why I've been using it.

[โ€“] artyom@piefed.social 6 points 5 days ago

It's certainly part of it, for many people. Try to sell your friends on using that old IRC client and tell me they don't take one look at it and turn their nose up at you.

[โ€“] whelk@retrolemmy.com 4 points 5 days ago

Glad people who like the UI can get it in Matrix too but personally yeah, the Discord UI has never been one I've liked. Way to insist on being fullscreen at all times

[โ€“] ZombieCyborgFromOuterSpace@piefed.ca 33 points 6 days ago (5 children)

Maybe that would help because I have a really hard time understanding how matrix works.ย 

[โ€“] unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de 17 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (6 children)

Ive been using it for many years now and i understand it can be confusing at times. Do you have any specific questions that i might be able to answer? I have onboarded dozens of people at this point and somehow we always figured it out.

I appreciate your help. I might reach out to you soon.

Maybe I should also look up some YouTube videos about it. That always helps as well.ย 

load more comments (5 replies)
[โ€“] Evotech@lemmy.world 10 points 6 days ago

Like lemmy more or less

load more comments (3 replies)
[โ€“] Alaknar@sopuli.xyz 9 points 6 days ago (1 children)

It's cool that it "supports threads", but - as so many other clients - it forgets to actually expose threads! As in: once the initial comment starting a thread slides up in the chat, the only way to access the thread is to scroll all the way up there again.

Fake edit: OK, Commet shows all threads if you type "thread" in search. Still, having a button to do just that would be infinitely better.

Also: no support for polls? :(

[โ€“] Holytimes@sh.itjust.works 3 points 5 days ago (1 children)

The age old matrix problem, every client is uniquely shitty and poorly put together.

I swear the day a feature rich and actually competent matrix client is released is the same day gnome devs will stop having stupid takes and Wayland devs will stop arguing.

[โ€“] Alaknar@sopuli.xyz 4 points 5 days ago

And KDE devs will stop assuming they know better than their users...

What kills me is that even the "official" clients (Element, and Element X) are not full-featured. What kills me even more is that Element X (the official "new" app and the "replacement" for Element) supports some additional features over Element, but not all - as in, some things are not possible in it, but are possible in Element.

It's like it's run by an insane asylum...

[โ€“] Xylian@lemmy.world 8 points 6 days ago (1 children)
[โ€“] whelk@retrolemmy.com 6 points 5 days ago

Return to Pidgin

Thank you so much! Always down to try a new matrix client. So much potential.

[โ€“] Samsy@lemmy.ml 3 points 5 days ago

This looks promising. For my self host/privacy friends, this one simply has unifiedpush support (simple-x still hasn't).

PS. This app isn't listed here: https://unifiedpush.org/users/apps/ Time to tell them.

My best friend used to go by @comet on Discord. He's the one who made my friend group's server, and he's essentially the only reason I ever got it in the first place (now, he's one of the first to join my Matrix instance). The fact that this project is named Commet is NOT good for my "main character syndrome"!

[โ€“] Pamasich@kbin.earth 4 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Is there a reason the room icons have to be humongous, at least in the web version on PC?

Other than that, looks great.

[โ€“] Minizarbi@jlai.lu 6 points 6 days ago (1 children)

It's spelled Among Us, not humongous.

[โ€“] sakuraba@lemmy.ml 3 points 6 days ago

its spell amogus

Saved for later, will probably try once it publishes to flathub.

Thanks, that actually looks like a nice android alternative to cinny

load more comments
view more: next โ€บ