this post was submitted on 16 Feb 2026
101 points (89.8% liked)

politics

28312 readers
2217 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Newsom and his team have successfully tapped into the need that many rank-and-file Democrats have for adopting a confrontational approach to Trump and his policies. But few people outside of California know much about the governor’s actual record — and many Democratic voters will be turned off to learn that his fervent opposition to a billionaire tax is part of an overall political approach that has trended more and more corporate-friendly.

A year ago, Newsom sent about 100 leaders of California-based companies a prepaid cell phone “programmed with Newsom’s digits and accompanied by notes from the governor himself,” POLITICO reported. One note to the CEO of a big tech corporation said, “If you ever need anything, I’m a phone call away.” While pandering to business elites, Newsom has slashed budgets to assist the poor and near-poor with healthcare, housing and food – in a state where seven million live under the official poverty line and child poverty rates are the highest in the nation.

...

“Governor Newsom’s reluctance to propose meaningful revenue solutions to help blunt the harm of federal cuts undermines his posture to counter the Trump administration.” The statement said that the proposed budget “will leave many Californians without food assistance and healthcare coverage.”

So far, key facts about Newsom’s policy priorities have scarcely gone beyond California’s borders. “National media have focused on Newsom as a personality and potential White House candidate and have almost completely ignored what he has and has not done as a governor,” said columnist Dan Walters, whose five decades covering California politics included 33 years at the Sacramento Bee. “It’s a perpetual failing of national political media to be more interested in image and gamesmanship rather than actual actions, the sizzle rather than the steak, and Newsom is very adept at exploiting that tendency.”

all 45 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] PumpkinEscobar@lemmy.world 9 points 46 minutes ago

progressive credentials

He's only progressive if you squint a little, really want very badly to see him as progressive, and then pretend his actions line up with his progressive speech. And even the left-most of his speech is really milquetoast progressive, like elevator muzak rock and roll.

[–] ZoteTheMighty@lemmy.zip 3 points 42 minutes ago (1 children)

Remember, the "both sides" argument is always helpful, aren't you glad you dodged having Kamala Harris for president?!?

[–] supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 1 points 37 minutes ago* (last edited 37 minutes ago)

I voted for Kamala, asshat.

[–] MajinBlayze@lemmy.world 45 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) (2 children)

Anywhere else in the country, Newsom would have run as a Republican.

Genuinely, if Newsom is selected by the Democratic party in 2028, nothing will change and we'll be staring down the barrel of trump 2.0 in 2032.

There are only two ways for the Democratic party to be relevant at this point:

  1. Support politicians who bring actual change to improve people's lives
  2. Actually punish Republican politicians for all of the crimes that they are doing in broad daylight right now.

But the Dems showed in NY how they feel about #1, and are refusing to do anything with #2 in Minnesota (and completely fumbled the opportunity they had over the last few ~~years~~ decades nationwide)

[–] just_another_person@lemmy.world 21 points 2 hours ago (2 children)

I disagree with this. He has a quintessentially non-GOP and Progressive LEAN. It's just he grew up rich, became MORE rich, then got into politics young, so the other half half of him is a piece of shit.

He likes to think he USED to be a piece of shit, but he's still at least half a piece of shit.

Slicked back hair. Glass House. White Ferrari. Live for New Year's Eve. Sloppy steaks at Truffoni's. Big rare cut of meat with water dumped all over it, water splashing around the table...

[–] MajinBlayze@lemmy.world 5 points 2 hours ago (2 children)
[–] Rekhyt@lemmy.world 7 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Geez you can't jump scare me like that

[–] MajinBlayze@lemmy.world 4 points 2 hours ago

Lol, sorry. Thread needs a TW

[–] supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 hour ago

Oh no, now all the comments on this thread are going to read out in my internal voice artificially fast and it will make everyone sound smarmy af.

[–] Peppycito@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

I don't know what a watery steak is about? Can I have more information please?

[–] evenglow@lemmy.world 4 points 1 hour ago

All the not-Republicans need to pick a leader now. Before one is picked for them.

[–] TomMasz@lemmy.world 18 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

He does fine as a thorn in Trump's side. But that's it.

[–] supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 14 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) (1 children)

You mean he does fine as the WWE kfabe opponent to Trump who performs the character of a resistance fighter on stage right?

[–] crusa187@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 hour ago

For a corporate Dem like Newsom, that’s the most we’re ever going to get is theatre. So yeah.

To this post’s point, hell no on rallying behind him in ‘28. There are those who claim the DNC leadership has evolved and won’t be captured by corporate interests this time around. I think whether they attempt to shove Newsom down our throats is the perfect test of this theory.

Unfortunately, so much hangs in the balance of that decision. Really hate the two party trap we’re living in, at times like this especially.

[–] redfish@piefed.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 hour ago

now do shapiro

[–] BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

I think he’s blue MAGA fascist scum who should be tarred, feathered and barred from government if he survived. I remind others of this constantly. He must never be tolerated as a candidate again. If he were to somehow steal a nomination he is not to be voted for, revolution will be the only chance we have left.

[–] just_another_person@lemmy.world 9 points 2 hours ago (3 children)

Jesus Christ, show us your melodramatic and hyperbolic side, please. 🙄

[–] Willoughby@piefed.world 4 points 1 hour ago (2 children)

Women and children are in concentration camps on US soil.

Seems, I dunno... kinda serious?

[–] Tetragrade@leminal.space 1 points 26 minutes ago

How could Kamala do this

[–] just_another_person@lemmy.world 0 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

So...your rationale is that Donald Trump and his cronies are acting like Nazis, so now Gavin Newsom is also responsible?

Shit, bro. You better just go after everyone that doesn't have the legal capability to do anything about that. Seems like you're maybe distracted by the wrong thing and not able to think of how to attack those problems aside from blaming absolutely everyone and doing nothing about it in the end.

[–] Willoughby@piefed.world 1 points 42 minutes ago* (last edited 39 minutes ago)

Responsible? No, God no. I don't think Trump being POTUS and raiding homes is anyone's first idea but Trump's and maybe his puppet masters.

buuut... is he...

Complicit? 100%

Paid off? 100%

Collaborated? 100%

[–] BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world 8 points 2 hours ago (2 children)

I hate to downvote someone with such a high personal upvote score from me, but if you think I’m being melodramatic about homeless-torturing, bigoted, transphobic, nazi-felating, genocide-denying, surveilance-state supporting, openly corrupt cartoon villain that is Gavin Newsom then you have not been paying attention.

[–] deHaga@feddit.uk 4 points 2 hours ago (2 children)

I hate to downvote someone with such a high personal upvote score from me

A what?

[–] Postimo@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 hour ago

I'm guessing they have something that tracks your upvotes and downvotes for each user, and that the person they are replying to has a high count of upvotes.

[–] BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

Some apps, like Voyager, keep track of the total votes you have personally given to others.

A screenshot of the Voyager app showing someone with a high upvote score.

[–] just_another_person@lemmy.world -2 points 2 hours ago

The tarred and feathered and barred from govt thing. You should have just said what was in your response to me to be illustrative.

We don't tar and feather people anymore for a reason. That's both melodramatic and hyperbolic because of this fact.

[–] supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 7 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) (1 children)

I don't think it is wrong to feel this existential about things, especially with someone as dangerous as Gavin Newsom who seems to be able to blatantly do evil shit but still get a hall pass from liberals because he had a good retort to Trump on facebook or something.

This inability and unwillingness to understand political leaders and have basic policy literacy about them will absolutely be terminal to our democracy if Gavin wins the next election just as much as it will be if Trump or one of his goon's do.

If one more damn liberal tells me "Now is not the time!" one more time my brain is going to leak out my ears and I will begin hysterically crying/laughing.

[–] just_another_person@lemmy.world 0 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago) (1 children)

If you were given a microphone in front of a huge crowd of people, started detailing all the reasons why you think he shouldn't be a candidate for president, and then closed with "YEAH, LET'S TAR AND FEATHER THIS FUCKER, THEN LET'S BAN HIM FROM GOVERNMENT!!! HYAAAAAA!!!!"

You think those people would be likely to be still think you're to be treated seriously and still follow your suggestions?

We need people to speak strongly, but not be insane.

[–] supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 3 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

We need people to speak strongly, but not be insane.

We need people to speak to the urgency and existential nature of this moment. Yeah I don't literally support tar and feathering Gavin. Yes calling for violence is bad, fine I disagree with that but that is a five alarm fire moment so I'm less inclined to clamp down on that phrasing in this context. I am far more scared of the implications of Gavin playing a spoiler in this election.

[–] ArbitraryValue@sh.itjust.works -1 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

I don't think "disappoints California progressives" is the damning indictment that California progressives seem to think that it is, even within California.

[–] supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 3 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago) (2 children)

Do you think the average US voter alligns with Gavin Newsom's policies? This isn't about being progressive it is about Gavin not having popular policy positions nor a track record that would give nervous voters confidence.

[–] ArbitraryValue@sh.itjust.works 0 points 48 minutes ago* (last edited 47 minutes ago) (2 children)

I think so, or rather I think that the average US voter aligns more with Gavin Newsom's policies than with the policies of a hypothetical alternative candidate that Salon might prefer. (Even the average California voter aligned with his policies enough to elect him, after all.) As for what gives nervous voters confidence: that seems to be more about theatrics and vibes than about policies. I'm personally not impressed by Newsom's Twitter shtick but maybe swing voters are - I assume he did his research.

[–] supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 1 points 34 minutes ago* (last edited 34 minutes ago)

This leads to a second strike against Newsom: California has struggled during his time as governor, which began in 2019. It is one of just seven states that has experienced a net population loss since the start of the Covid-19 pandemic in 2020, shedding 91,000 residents—more than any state except New York. One of the biggest culprits has been the state’s unaffordability. California has long been one of the most expensive states to live in, a reality that has only grown worse in the last five years.

It’s important to note that Newsom has recently worked to reduce red tape and accelerate the construction of new housing to lower home prices. But rather than taking a cue from another Democrat on the rise, Zohran Mamdani—who, despite his own vulnerabilities, has adopted an almost monomaniacal focus on cost-of-living issues in his New York City mayoral campaign—Newsom hasn’t touted these efforts nearly as much and has instead pivoted to picking fights with national Republicans.

This is a troubling development, especially as Americans have identified inflation as the most important issue facing the country for the last three years, and many voters, including pivotal swing voters, voted for Trump with cost of living at top of mind last year. Come 2028, with Trump out of the picture, how does Newsom plan to respond to critics of his management of the state?

https://www.liberalpatriot.com/p/democrats-can-do-better-than-gavin

[–] supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 1 points 46 minutes ago

I think so, or rather I think that the average US voter aligns more with Gavin Newsom's policies than with the policies of a hypothetical alternative candidate that Salon might prefer.

I know you think that, paradoxically many people do but you are wrong that is my point.

[–] BillCheddar@lemmy.world -3 points 1 hour ago (2 children)

I highly doubt that any of the people complaining about Newsom have any idea what Newsom's policies even are.

But the idea that the Democratic governor of California isn't liberal enough is just laughable. You guys are as delusional as MAGA folks, as Russians, as North Koreans.

[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 3 points 1 hour ago

I highly doubt that any of the people complaining about Newsom have any idea what Newsom's policies even are.

Literally under an article about Newsom's policies. You should hit your head against a horseshoe until you're back in reality.

[–] supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

Look at his policies fool, he is a Democrat In Name Only.

One, that's every candidate. Two, yeah we already know he's authoritarian lite.

[–] blitzen@lemmy.ca -4 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) (2 children)

I 100% want to live in a world governed by true progressives.

I also think he’s by an order of magnitude more likely to be elected by the country at large than Sanders / AOC et al. And while Newsom is no true progressive and is FAR from perfect, he has made a handful of big progressive swings.

Newsom may be the candidate in which the following truism best applies: vote with your heart in the primary, with your head in the general.

[–] crusa187@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 hour ago

Could you elaborate on those alleged progressive swings? Newsom seems to side with corporate at every opportunity. With PG&E he went from demanding accountability for their unsafe practices (PR stunt), to vetoing legislation aimed at reigning them in (meaningful action blocking the progressive desires of his constituents on behalf of his mega donors).

[–] supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 9 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) (1 children)

There is no evidence Newsom's policies are more popular than AOC, neither is there evidence Newsom is more potentially popular to US voters as a political figure than AOC.

Stop spreading narratives that have no basis in reality.

[–] blitzen@lemmy.ca -2 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) (1 children)

Hence the “I think” in my statement. It’s not a narrative, it’s an opinion.

[–] supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 8 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

Ok but this is unhelpful lazy speculation, actually do some research on AOC, if anything Gavin Newsom is a major gamble to US voters with his inability to even rhetorically much less materially fight back against billionaires, which is a bipartisan liability in the next presidential election the size of a large battleship according to polling.