this post was submitted on 16 Feb 2026
126 points (90.4% liked)

politics

28312 readers
2186 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Newsom and his team have successfully tapped into the need that many rank-and-file Democrats have for adopting a confrontational approach to Trump and his policies. But few people outside of California know much about the governor’s actual record — and many Democratic voters will be turned off to learn that his fervent opposition to a billionaire tax is part of an overall political approach that has trended more and more corporate-friendly.

A year ago, Newsom sent about 100 leaders of California-based companies a prepaid cell phone “programmed with Newsom’s digits and accompanied by notes from the governor himself,” POLITICO reported. One note to the CEO of a big tech corporation said, “If you ever need anything, I’m a phone call away.” While pandering to business elites, Newsom has slashed budgets to assist the poor and near-poor with healthcare, housing and food – in a state where seven million live under the official poverty line and child poverty rates are the highest in the nation.

...

“Governor Newsom’s reluctance to propose meaningful revenue solutions to help blunt the harm of federal cuts undermines his posture to counter the Trump administration.” The statement said that the proposed budget “will leave many Californians without food assistance and healthcare coverage.”

So far, key facts about Newsom’s policy priorities have scarcely gone beyond California’s borders. “National media have focused on Newsom as a personality and potential White House candidate and have almost completely ignored what he has and has not done as a governor,” said columnist Dan Walters, whose five decades covering California politics included 33 years at the Sacramento Bee. “It’s a perpetual failing of national political media to be more interested in image and gamesmanship rather than actual actions, the sizzle rather than the steak, and Newsom is very adept at exploiting that tendency.”

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] wuffah@lemmy.world 4 points 45 minutes ago

At this point, I would vote for an upturned mop painted with lipstick for president.

[–] PumpkinEscobar@lemmy.world 20 points 2 hours ago

progressive credentials

He's only progressive if you squint a little, really want very badly to see him as progressive, and then pretend his actions line up with his progressive speech. And even the left-most of his speech is really milquetoast progressive, like elevator muzak rock and roll.

[–] MajinBlayze@lemmy.world 57 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (3 children)

Anywhere else in the country, Newsom would have run as a Republican.

Genuinely, if Newsom is selected by the Democratic party in 2028, nothing will change and we'll be staring down the barrel of trump 2.0 in 2032.

There are only two ways for the Democratic party to be relevant at this point:

  1. Support politicians who bring actual change to improve people's lives
  2. Actually punish Republican politicians for all of the crimes that they are doing in broad daylight right now.

But the Dems showed in NY how they feel about #1, and are refusing to do anything with #2 in Minnesota (and completely fumbled the opportunity they had over the last few ~~years~~ decades nationwide)

[–] AshMan85@lemmy.world 1 points 45 minutes ago (2 children)
[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 3 points 33 minutes ago* (last edited 33 minutes ago)

I think they mean whoever the next fascist is to become President once Trump is gone.

[–] MajinBlayze@lemmy.world 1 points 19 minutes ago

Unless you're referring to conspiracy theories about being replaced by a clone, in pretty sure it's still the same guy

[–] just_another_person@lemmy.world 27 points 4 hours ago (2 children)

I disagree with this. He has a quintessentially non-GOP and Progressive LEAN. It's just he grew up rich, became MORE rich, then got into politics young, so the other half half of him is a piece of shit.

He likes to think he USED to be a piece of shit, but he's still at least half a piece of shit.

Slicked back hair. Glass House. White Ferrari. Live for New Year's Eve. Sloppy steaks at Truffoni's. Big rare cut of meat with water dumped all over it, water splashing around the table...

[–] MajinBlayze@lemmy.world 5 points 4 hours ago (2 children)
[–] Rekhyt@lemmy.world 11 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Geez you can't jump scare me like that

[–] MajinBlayze@lemmy.world 4 points 3 hours ago

Lol, sorry. Thread needs a TW

[–] supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 2 points 3 hours ago

Oh no, now all the comments on this thread are going to read out in my internal voice artificially fast and it will make everyone sound smarmy af.

[–] Peppycito@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

I don't know what a watery steak is about? Can I have more information please?

[–] evenglow@lemmy.world 6 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

All the not-Republicans need to pick a leader now. Before one is picked for them.

[–] EmpireInDecay@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 hour ago

We never pick a leader, that's a role exclusively delegated to the party. We have the illusion of choice with primaries but in the end the party always gets their pick

[–] TomMasz@lemmy.world 23 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

He does fine as a thorn in Trump's side. But that's it.

[–] supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 16 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (1 children)

You mean he does fine as the WWE kfabe opponent to Trump who performs the character of a resistance fighter on stage right?

[–] crusa187@lemmy.ml 9 points 3 hours ago

For a corporate Dem like Newsom, that’s the most we’re ever going to get is theatre. So yeah.

To this post’s point, hell no on rallying behind him in ‘28. There are those who claim the DNC leadership has evolved and won’t be captured by corporate interests this time around. I think whether they attempt to shove Newsom down our throats is the perfect test of this theory.

Unfortunately, so much hangs in the balance of that decision. Really hate the two party trap we’re living in, at times like this especially.

[–] ZoteTheMighty@lemmy.zip 4 points 2 hours ago (4 children)

Remember, the "both sides" argument is always helpful, aren't you glad you dodged having Kamala Harris for president?!?

[–] SuiXi3D@fedia.io 4 points 36 minutes ago

We just don’t want to be stuck with a lame duck as our only option.

[–] Turret3857@infosec.pub 3 points 17 minutes ago

"Guys I know we're 2 years out from the Presidentals but stop shitting on the open transphobe who platforms literal Nazis on his podcast, is married to a registered republican and doesnt do anything remotely left leaning for his state! At least he's a democrat!"

😐

[–] supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 9 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

I voted for Kamala, asshat.

[–] I_Jedi@lemmy.today -2 points 38 minutes ago

Both sides are too soft to achieve the one goal worth doing: The total extinction of the human race.

[–] desmosthenes@lemmy.world -1 points 44 minutes ago (2 children)

lol every week there’s one of these gavin bad posts on here; there’s a lot worse out there - in more power - right now

[–] Turret3857@infosec.pub 3 points 20 minutes ago* (last edited 19 minutes ago)

"Guys I know we're 2 years out from the Presidentals but stop shitting on the open transphobe who platforms literal Nazis on his podcast, is married to a registered republican and doesnt do anything remotely left leaning for his state. There's worse people out there!"

😐 news flash buddy, theres also better people.

[–] supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 2 points 14 minutes ago

Ok? Gavin is a false alternative to them and is dangerous because he only superficially appears to be an alternative.

[–] redfish@piefed.blahaj.zone 1 points 3 hours ago

now do shapiro

load more comments
view more: next ›