this post was submitted on 17 Feb 2026
444 points (97.4% liked)

Canada

11645 readers
809 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://hexbear.net/post/7671573

Sweden knew Canada's Marc Kennedy was a notorious cheater.

So they set up a camera at the 'hog line' to record it.

And caught him doing it at the Olympics.

tweto

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Glide@lemmy.ca 179 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

I trust whatever committee they have at the Olympics to make the judgement on this, but if our team is cheating, fuck those guys.

Yes, there's some redactionist arguments about how it "doesn't actually impact the rock," but fuck that. We have a codified rule that specifically says you can't do it, and these athletes are playing at literally the highest level that exists. They know better and have had time to practice better. If they're cheating at the Olympics, I hope it follows them forever.

[–] aim_at_me@lemmy.nz 93 points 1 week ago (2 children)

If it doesn’t impact the rock, then why do they risk breaking the rules to do it?

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 57 points 1 week ago

It can prevent over-rotation of the rock. He knew exactly what he was doing.

[–] Glide@lemmy.ca 15 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

Because extreme cases can impact the rock. Barely touching the rock in the way caught on film realistically isn't impacting the rock, but the rule needs to exist to prevent someone from actively pushing the rock after letting go.

But again, these guys know better and have had the time and resources to train better.

[–] WraithGear@lemmy.world 45 points 1 week ago (2 children)

ok, but we are talking about a sport that is using brooms to micro melt the ice, and on a molecular level changing how the rotation changes the direction of this rock… someone touching the rock seems much more impactful

[–] Glide@lemmy.ca 18 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

Fair enough. I realize now that I spoke with more confidence on the reality of the situation than I intended. Any avid curler I've spoken with regarding this in the last couple days swears up and down that the level of interaction that supposidly occurred between the curler and the rock is genuinely a non-factor. I do not know from any level of personal experience, hence why I stated that I trust whatever Olympic panel exists. I merely wanted to counter the poor argument that "the rule wouldn't exist if it can't impact the rock," as the rule can absolutely exist for the purpose of more clear cut cases.

Armchair analysis is rarely worth taking seriously. I suspect that neither of us actually know from experience, but maybe you're a professional curler.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] CanadianMade@lemmy.ca 123 points 1 week ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] t0fr@lemmy.ca 113 points 1 week ago (5 children)

Not really a good look for us. Would rather our athletes not cheat on an international stage representing our country. Play by the rules or not at all. Thank you very much.

[–] shawn1122@sh.itjust.works 57 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (5 children)

Getting caught with "you can fuck off" on a hit mic doesn't help either. Last thing anyone wants is for Canada to gain a reputation of cheating, especially after the drone scandal with the Canadian womens soccer team at the Paris Olympics in '24.

Ahead of the tournament, on 22 July, New Zealand players noticed a drone flying over their training session and reported this to local police.[2] Drone operating laws in France ban drones from being flown above people and ban recordings made by drones to be shared without the subjects' consent. French police were already wary of drones in terms of security around the 2024 Summer Olympics.[1][3] Saint-Étienne police followed the drone and found and detained its operator, a member of the staff of the Canadian team. The New Zealand Olympic Committee (NZOC) then reported the incident to the International Olympic Committee (IOC) integrity unit, before making a public announcement the next day together with New Zealand Football, expressing their disappointment towards the Canadian team. The Canadian Olympic Committee (COC) then apologized to the NZOC and said they would review next steps with Canada Soccer and all the relevant governing bodies.[2][4]

The drone operator, analyst Joseph Lombardi, admitted after his arrest that he had also filmed another New Zealand training session on 19 July,[5] a fact later made public by the COC.[1][3] Though Lombardi immediately said that the spying was "a personal initiative", the police found a text message exchange on his phone with assistant coach Jasmine Mander that indicated Mander knew of the spying.[6]

If you're resorting to espionage please just accept that you suck and don't do things that drag your nations reputation in the process.

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 29 points 1 week ago

Anyone involved in this should be fired and not allowed anywhere near amateur or professional sports teams.

Flying drones to record trainings during the Olympics isn't "a little bit cheating", that shit should be smashed to hell

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Bassman27@lemmy.world 103 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Send them on an all expenses paid trip to America as punishment!

[–] Lemmyoutofhere@lemmy.ca 79 points 1 week ago (8 children)

Of fuck that’s a war crime.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] FatVegan@leminal.space 27 points 1 week ago

Woah dude, chill

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] saimen@feddit.org 41 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I think this whole issue is just set up by Big Curling to make this sport interesting.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] xkbx@startrek.website 37 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Did we learn nothing from Men With Brooms?!

I am disgusted. Appalled. Normally that would also turn me on but in this case I find the actions too morally reprehensible.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] tomiant@piefed.social 32 points 1 week ago (31 children)

For anyone struggling with why this is a big deal* it's like if you were playing billiards and nudged the ball after you made the shot because you didn't like the angle of the shot, it kind of ruins the whole point

* lol, I mean, for curling at least

load more comments (31 replies)
[–] TheTimeKnife@lemmy.world 29 points 1 week ago

I love curling drama.

[–] toiletobserver@lemmy.world 27 points 1 week ago (9 children)

That does seem like solid proof

[–] Greddan@feddit.org 55 points 1 week ago (16 children)

Yes, but the Canadians threw a hissyfit shouting "Fuck off!" repeatedly at the Swedes during the match. They later went to Swedish newspapers accusing the Swedes of staging a conspiracy against them.

Those mooseknuckleheads should have been disqualified from the match for their shitty behaviour.

[–] NotSteve_@piefed.ca 20 points 1 week ago (1 children)

We're not sending our best [to the Olympics] :(

[–] shittydwarf@sh.itjust.works 12 points 1 week ago

Yep not impressed with this display of poor sportsmanship

load more comments (15 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 22 points 1 week ago
[–] wax@feddit.nu 20 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Why is there not a camera from the top pointing down? Wouldn't that solve any disputes?

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Whimsical418@aussie.zone 16 points 1 week ago (2 children)

If anyone's interested in the world curling statement, here. Basically, umpire decisions in the moment are final and cannot be changed from video evidence, the thrower may retouch the stone as many times as they want before the line, BUT they must release the stone from the handle. So a little bit dubious? But they can't change it even with video evidence.

[–] mvirts@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It does say touching the granite part of the stone is forbidden

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Redacted@lemmy.zip 15 points 1 week ago

They should be forced to give back the medal

[–] Concave1142@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Wait... As a non-sportsperson, what's the drama here?

[–] Thorry@feddit.org 38 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

There is a line after which they are no longer allowed to touch the stone. The handles on the stone have sensors on it, to detect a touch after the line and call foul. But the Canadians touched the stone itself, not the handles. Which isn't a legal move, but isn't automatically detected. And with how they did it, the refs didn't see it right away.

Edit: Correction, it doesn't actually matter if it's before or after the hog line, once the handle is released on the stone nobody is allowed to touch it anymore. The release has to be before the hog line, but there is no touching after that regardless of where the stone is.

[–] thefool@sh.itjust.works 23 points 1 week ago (1 children)

In that shot, he is still before the hog line, but regardless still not allowed to touch that part of the stone. Touching it there should have zero effect on the actual throw, but it's still illegal

[–] FireRetardant@lemmy.world 22 points 1 week ago

It looks like hes either trying to nudge it over a touch or a put a bit of spin on it. He wouldn't risk cheating at the Olympics with a method that has zero effect.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 13 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

I'm glad that Canadian guy throwing out the f-bombs apologized for it. I still think he was a dick but I can get over the lashing out if it comes with repentance.

load more comments (2 replies)

Read on the subject and it seems a bit overblown, social media helping. After the controversy they started being more vigilant and then they "caught" a british curler also double touching.

That being said they need to adjust their release technique to make sure it doesn't damage the reputation of Canadian curlers.

Also video replay and challenges could be a good idea.

load more comments
view more: next ›