this post was submitted on 18 Feb 2026
421 points (99.8% liked)

politics

28392 readers
2198 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

“Late Show” host Stephen Colbert on Tuesday night called CBS’s denial of his claim that it blocked the broadcast of his interview with Texas state Rep. James Talarico “crap” — and urged the network and its parent, Paramount Skydance, to stand up to the “bullies” in the Trump administration.

Colbert’s broadside came hours after CBS issued a statement on the controversy.

The host, whose show will end in May as it was canceled by CBS, held up a printed copy of the network’s statement about Talarico’s interview during his show Tuesday night and said, “I don’t even know what to do with this crap.”

all 33 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] danc4498@lemmy.world 8 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

I know Colbert has to give CBS the benefit of the doubt, but CBS IS the Trump administration.

Fuck CBS. Fuck paramount. Cancel your Paramount plus subscriptions if you haven’t already. You get get Star Trek without giving them money.

[–] chahn.chris@piefed.social 1 points 2 hours ago

Cancelled today!!

[–] Numinous_Ylem@lemmy.world 7 points 7 hours ago

CBS is simping for fascists

[–] frunch@lemmy.world 94 points 14 hours ago (5 children)

It's not even like some bombshell interview or anything either. It's basically a Christian running for Senate in Texas that's saying Trump and his ilk are not real Christians and that there are lots of people out there that are fed up with the corruption in the church and especially in politics. He didn't make any really bold statements or say anything that could have been considered aggressive or hateful. All told, it was a fairly uneventful interview that got a whole lot more traction than it might have because it got censored. It would have been hardly a blip on the radar otherwise. I hope the 'Colbert bump' helps get him in office.

[–] LucidNightmare@lemmy.dbzer0.com 27 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

I believe the biggest thing that they don't want getting out is:

"This isn't a Democrat vs. Republican issue, this is a Top vs. Bottom issue."

They REALLY do not like it when people point out the true gambit they deploy.

[–] LordMayor@piefed.social 56 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

A verifiable Christian publicly pointing out that Trump and most Republicans aren’t real Christians is possibly one of the most damaging attacks that can be made against them.

Losing Christians—even just to apathy—would be the death of the Republican Party. Conservatives have courted, manipulated and used Christian righteousness to get where they are today. They need them.

It’s why Peter Thiel is talking about the antichrist. The American conservative engine runs on holier-than-thou, righteous indignation.

[–] Reygle@lemmy.world 25 points 11 hours ago

Religious people have had their critical thinking skills ripped out of them for their entire lives.

My lovely mother has been completely convinced of "definitely happening" raptures dozens of times in the last 15 years. These people continue to vote.

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 13 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (1 children)

You're right, but if there's one thing dictators cannot tolerate on any level, it's unchecked criticism. Sure, these days there is still some level of allowing free speech for appearances, but if it's high profile and trump thinks he can exercise his control, he damn sure will.

The Jimmy Kimmel incident is the perfect example of this and what we can expect moving forward. The executives of companies have been installed specifically because they're right wingers and even those who aren't, are terrified of lawsuits. They probably know they can win the lawsuits, but it's just easier to kowtow, from their perspective.

It's surreal. I know I've been living a lie my whole life. I thought laws and the constitution would usually win out, at least when enough people knew about whatever criminal activities were happening. But I don't really expect any of that anymore. I was randomly reading up on Nazi Germany last night and I cannot help but wonder if we are in the "deport the impure Jews" phase of this. I've already internalized the idea that if they could get away with sending the "undesirables" to gas chambers, they would. But I still hold onto some hope I'm wrong. The news basically every day now though makes me think I'm not. That at best, it will get worse and not better.

What I cannot understand is what the point of anything trump does is. I bounce from one idea to another but none of it really makes full sense to me.

I know for sure he's looking to leave a legacy, that's obvious. But is he actually so goddamned hateful that his focus is determined by maximizing suffering? Is it because he thinks his supporters love this? (He's sadly correct if so)

Is he hoping to be infamous like Hitler and Stalin?

Is there a chance he's got some twisted sense of this being the right thing for America? Trust me, I don't put a lot of stock in this one because it's abundantly clear his number one priority is always himself. Maybe it's a secondary reason?

Ultimately I know that, like the original Nazis, you just cannot really understand the inner minds of evil people. But I cannot help but try. Not to empathize with them at all. It's morbid curiosity. How does one's sense of morality get so thoroughly fucked? There were hundreds of thousands of Germans who helped murder and imprison Jews. Each one of those people justified it to themselves. And a good chunk of them rationalized it so hard that a switch was flipped in their brain. "This is so important, mass murder is required and I will help commit it." was a thought process for many thousands of Germans. It's so hard to wrap one's head around. It's disgusting and demoralizing. But it's reality. Some people say humans are just evil inherently, and I see a lot supporting that argument. But they're also inherently good... sometimes.

Nazi Germany and the fact that Trump's approval rating right now is above 3% is evidence that this is a distinctly human phenomenon. We are capable of straight up evil. How the fuck can we fix it?

Sorry for the drawn out stream of consciousness reply... I needed to get that off my chest.

[–] Curious_Canid@piefed.ca 7 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

I understand where you're coming from, but I don't think that Trump has anything resembling a plan. He reacts to events, minute by minute, generally in the most cruel and hateful way possible.

He has plenty of advisors and backers who have coherent long-range plans, and they are making a disturbing amount of progress, but they're hampered by Trump's volatility and lack of focus. It also helps that those trying to define his agenda mostly have different interests.

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 2 points 11 hours ago

Well someone has a plan.

[–] Lasherz12@lemmy.world 5 points 12 hours ago

There's a few things about it. 1) Jasmine Crockett is their preferred opponent. 2) He showed Christian values that weren't genocidal were possible.

[–] PalmTreeIsBestTree@lemmy.world 6 points 13 hours ago

To be fair, this guy is the best candidate the Dems have ran in Texas in a long time.

[–] Sanctus@anarchist.nexus 5 points 8 hours ago

Why, Stephen, would the Ellisons stand up to Trump? They are on his side.

[–] Novis@lemdro.id 19 points 12 hours ago

I have to push back on just ONE thing. Paramount isn't being bullied. CEO is the son of Larry Ellison. Trying to not cast doubt on David but.... Rich men gonna be rich assholes. If they were actually being bullied, I do believe that they'd push back harder cause it's fucking Paramount and CBS is very well known and can very easily blast this to millions.

[–] Blackfeathr@lemmy.world 31 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

LOL at CBS trying to gaslight Stephen Colbert. Absolute buffoonery.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 16 points 12 hours ago

People should watch Jeff Daniel's Newsroom from 15 years ago. It was an accurate portrayal of the degradation of the Republican party and TV news and while it was optimistic, it predicted networks would be almost as bad as they are in 2026. Even their writers did not predict Fascism taking over the USA.

[–] Retail4068@lemmy.world 4 points 9 hours ago

Way to back a dead man walking into a corner and summon Streisand.

[–] ramble81@lemmy.zip 19 points 14 hours ago

If they say they deny it, then air it on the next show.

[–] SeeMarkFly@lemmy.ml 9 points 14 hours ago

“I don’t even know what to do with this crap.”

Yes he does. He used a doggie clean-up bag to pick it up and throw it in the trash.

GOOD BOY Stephen, GOOD BOY!

[–] Lasherz12@lemmy.world 3 points 12 hours ago

Bullies in the Trump administration = Bullies at the top of CBS. It's bought and paid for, Colbert just doesn't want his show to end prematurely for calling Bari Weiss and Larry Ellison out.

[–] commie_rogers@lemmy.ml -3 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

Does he really expect them to act against their class interests? Does he really believe they will or can choose to do the right thing just for goodness' sake?

If so, maybe he's not as clever as I've believed all this time.

The headline should be changed to "Colbert discovers ruling class unity, surprising only himself".

I feel bad for liberals. Being liberal must be a terribly confusing condition.

Go read Marx, kiddo!