this post was submitted on 18 Feb 2026
490 points (99.0% liked)

Technology

81387 readers
4761 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Dispatch.

It’s important to remember that Meta has hidden behind Section 230 for so long that people like Mark Zuckerberg thought they were bulletproof. Meta’s team of attorneys bet on the fact that these documents would never see the light of day because a product liability case would never make it to trial, and they guessed wrong,” said Sacha Haworth, Executive Director of The Tech Oversight Project. “Never-before-seen documents prove that Zuckerberg lied to Congress. We know that they will lie, bury research, and continue recklessly harming young people until Congress forces them to clean up their act. The only way to outlaw Meta’s dangerous and egregious behavior is to pass legislation, like the Kids Online Safety Act, which will hold their feet to the fire and force them to protect children and teens.

top 34 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] NewNewAugustEast@lemmy.zip 13 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

Or, crazy idea, how about not using their products? And maybe a little bit of parenting while we are at it.

Passing laws to save the kids always becomes another way to increase surveillance and harm citizens.

Maybe just fine him 40 billion dollars and put him in prison for lying to congress.

[–] lechekaflan@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

It's always the fucking money in the end. Paid for that doomsday bunker in Hawaii.

[–] devolution@lemmy.world 4 points 2 hours ago

Zuck lies every time he is before congress. As long as he's not held in contempt and INCARCERATED for lying under oath, who gives a fuck.

[–] johncandy1812@lemmy.ca 21 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Everybody just lies to congress now.

[–] IratePirate@feddit.org 3 points 2 hours ago

To, in, and about.

[–] pHr34kY@lemmy.world 29 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

I hope somewhere in this, someone points out that you cannot bookmark your friends feed. You can bookmark marketplace, or any other part of the site.

When you do manually navigate to your friends, you get pushed back to the infinite slop feed after almost every action.

They did this deliberately so you can't use facebook to keep tabs on your friends. You know, like it was originally built for.

[–] Telorand@reddthat.com 10 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

It was originally built to creep on college women, so creeping on its users more generally now is just a continuation of exactly what it was built for.

[–] MajorasTerribleFate@lemmy.zip 2 points 3 hours ago

They invited the target in, and realigned the cameras accordingly.

[–] chahn.chris@piefed.social 1 points 4 hours ago

You have to let the algorithm decide how you should be creeping. Shh, sleep now, and scroll, and click.

[–] No1@aussie.zone 4 points 4 hours ago

Mark Zuckerberg Lied to Congress. We Can’t Trust His Testimony.

Pfffffft. Well, he's not testifying before Congress most of the time, so I'm sure we can trust him then.

[–] roserose56@lemmy.zip 5 points 4 hours ago

Like it's the first time. Bravo USA.

[–] arcine@jlai.lu 59 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

No. Fuck the KOSA, it's the equivalent of burning down your house to get rid of a cockroach infestation.

Meta should be liable for their algorithm, no more, no less.

[–] NewNewAugustEast@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) (1 children)

I am curious how you could liable for an algorithym. All advertising and entertainment try and capture marketshare and retain people.

How exactly would you define that as illegal?

I am having a hard time not just saying stupid people do stupid things, but of course that is the definition of a child, so it's the parents that should be held responsible... For wanting to keep using something?

Dont get me wrong, using a tool to leverage weaknesses of the uneducated and disadvantaged is shitty as can be, but that has always been true.

Education and knowledge that this shit is doing what it is designed to do seems like the only long term solution.

[–] Spur4383@lemmy.world 2 points 46 minutes ago* (last edited 46 minutes ago)

Section 240 protects you from users posts, but not necessarily from promoting them above others algorithmically. You could find them liable for their prioritization choices on the timeline over one that just displays things chronologically. It’s been down time and time again that the display is not a chronological one to increase engagement. That is an editorial decision that should be liable for.

[–] UnspecificGravity@piefed.social 79 points 9 hours ago

This article starts out by observing that Zuckerberg committed enough crimes to be sent to prison under existing law and then argues that the only solution is more laws?

How about we just start making rich people subject to the same set of laws as everyone else?

[–] Ebby@lemmy.ssba.com 132 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

You had an argument until you brought up KOSA. That bill is absolutely brutal and had it passed, this administration would have yet another weapon to clamp down on free speech and terrorize citizens.

[–] fartographer@lemmy.world 8 points 6 hours ago

This bar-less chainsaw is entirely too dangerous, doesn't address any existing needs, and the so-called inventors lied about how many people have gotten hurt by it!

So you're going to either have them install a bar, which is a time-proven solution, or you're going to force them to stop selling it, right??

Oh, no. No. No, no, no, no... God no. We're gonna create a database that lets us predict if you're going to have an abortion by connecting your fitness data to which ads you look at the longest and cross-referencing your driving habits.

[–] XLE@piefed.social 21 points 8 hours ago

ItIt's frustrating because it's possible to attack companies like Facebook while fully endorsing Section 230. That law states that companies aren't liable for things that users post... Unless they become aware of bad content and choose to ignore it.

And Facebook has shown its hand here. They've admitted they have moderation tools, through their pledge to crack down on anti-genocide opinions. They want to have it both ways, but hopefully people see through their BS.

[–] artyom@piefed.social 86 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

The only way to outlaw Meta’s dangerous and egregious behavior is to pass legislation

Or we could just exercise existing legislation? Like perjury?

[–] matlag@sh.itjust.works 34 points 9 hours ago

All four sections carry a penalty of imprisonment for not more than five years, although § 1001 is punishable by imprisonment for not more than eight years when the offense involves terrorism or one of several federal sex offenses. The same five-year maximum penalty attends the separate crime of conspiracy to commit any of the four substantive offenses.

Even 1 year in jail should be a good enough incentive, if only he could not buy his way out.

[–] Jhex@lemmy.world 33 points 9 hours ago

If the USA had a functioning Justice Department, lying to Congress should have put the Zuck behind bars.

[–] Flying_Lynx@lemmy.ml 9 points 7 hours ago

“I don’t know why They ‘trust me. Dumb fucks.” - Zuckerberg once

[–] wesker@lemmy.sdf.org 23 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

Hold up, you're telling me Zuckerberg isn't a good person?

[–] ThePantser@sh.itjust.works 12 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

I am shocked that the guy who made a website to fuck college girls is a bad person.

[–] SpruceBringsteen@lemmy.world 9 points 9 hours ago

Highly relevant video of what sort of culture Zuck metastasized in at Harvard

[–] Prove_your_argument@piefed.social 9 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Is he considered a good lizard person?

[–] Murdoc@sh.itjust.works 2 points 4 hours ago
[–] TomMasz@lemmy.world 7 points 8 hours ago

We're living in post-truth times. Zuck is a large part of the reason why.

[–] daychilde@lemmy.world 12 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

I did more skimming than reading of the linked article because I don't care that much abou tthe topic, but I just want to say: We need more of this journalism. THIS is what journalists should be doing so much more of. Calling out lies and specifically this is a great format for that.

[–] 4am@lemmy.zip 6 points 8 hours ago

True to a point - the article justifies KOSA as a solution to this. We need a whole lot less of that, and a whole lot more holding power accountable. Both the government and the billionaires.

[–] minorkeys@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

It is unwise to trust the words of anyone with something to lose by speaking truth or something to gain by speaking a lie.

[–] breadsmasher@lemmy.world 7 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

page formatting is atrocious on dispatch

[–] daychilde@lemmy.world 2 points 9 hours ago

https://archive.ph/XO6Pn

Dunno if that'll be better, but I created it to see if it helped :)

[–] krimson@lemmy.world 2 points 8 hours ago

The only thing you can do to punish this fuck is by not using any of his current and future spyware.