this post was submitted on 23 Feb 2026
19 points (100.0% liked)

politics

28499 readers
3187 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Both sides may well be posturing. Washington’s muscular deployments could be intended primarily as leverage to wrest maximal concessions out of Tehran at the table rather than as a prelude to war. U.S. military planners must be well aware of how much extensive fighting could cost, not only in terms of danger to U.S. forces and materiel but also in tax dollars. The twelve-day war of June 2025 cost Israel up to $12 billion, while depleting a quarter of the entire U.S. stock of THAAD interceptors – some 150 of them – which are worth $12 million apiece. Even within the military there is apprehension about the impact of sending so many U.S. assets to the Middle East on U.S. preparedness elsewhere.

...

Unfortunately, bargaining by bluffing – if indeed that is what either side is trying to do – is intrinsically unstable, particularly when this much weaponry is involved. Measures meant to deter or coerce can just as easily provoke. Ample room exists for miscalculation or potentially even for spoilers to stage false-flag attacks that narrow leaders’ choices by pushing them to respond with force. In such a charged environment, the boundary between managed escalation and uncontrolled war is perilously thin – and often discernible only in hindsight. It is all too easy to imagine the sort of exchanges at sea that transpired in early February, with the U.S. downing an Iranian drone and Iranian forces attempting to seize a U.S. tanker, flaring into a bigger exchange without either side having decided to enter hostilities.

top 3 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] favoredponcho@lemmy.zip 1 points 7 minutes ago

Interesting, I didn’t know Congress had declared war.

[–] xc2215x@lemmy.world 1 points 28 minutes ago

Israel and Trump want the war.

[–] Assassassin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 hour ago

That would require the US to have an adult in the room, which will not be happening any time soon.