this post was submitted on 27 Feb 2026
169 points (100.0% liked)

politics

28581 readers
2689 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Pete Hegseth has threatened to cancel $200m contract unless it is given unfettered access to Claude model

Anthropic said Thursday it “cannot in good conscience” comply with a demand from the Pentagon to remove safety precautions from its artificial intelligence model and grant the US military unfettered access to its AI capabilities.

The Department of Defense had threatened to cancel a $200m contract and deem Anthropic a “supply chain risk”, a designation with serious financial implications, if the company did not comply with the request by Friday.

Chief executive Dario Amodei said in a statement that the threats from the defense secretary, Pete Hegseth, would not change the company’s position, and that he hoped Hegseth would “reconsider”.

top 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] kurmudgeon@lemmy.world 4 points 1 hour ago
[–] Shanmugha@lemmy.world 2 points 43 minutes ago

I am going to buy a big bucket of pop-corn for this

[–] daannii@lemmy.world 16 points 4 hours ago (3 children)

Just give them a fake broken version of it and say "we are still working on some of the bugs".

[–] plateee@piefed.social 14 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

give them a fake broken version

So normal AI then?

[–] BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca -1 points 48 minutes ago (1 children)

Haters so far behind at this point they don't understand how they're getting absolutely fucked by ai agent swarms.

An individual agent is stupid, a million of them can get a job done that is otherwise impossible.

They're being used for everything from marketing to propaganda at this point, and most people still think they suck because they can be tricked or fail basic questions.

You can trick humans too, doesn't mean they can't do impressive things as well, especially in large groups.

[–] ATPA9@feddit.org 1 points 22 minutes ago

Ah yes, the impossible task of creating a barely functioning C compiler...

[–] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 7 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 9 minutes ago) (1 children)

The funny thing about fascists is that they are so mentally ill, immature, and authoritarian that they self-own constantly. The traits that make them fascist also render them completely incompetent and unable to create; only steal, co-opt, terrorize, and destroy.

If they nationalize or criminalize Anthropic, they will lose most of the brains that made it competitive, and be left with yet another failed fascist endeavor. It's in their best interests to compel companies with a lighter touch. This is why every bit of resistance matters, from every institution and org (though don't expect late stage caps to do the right thing).

But most Americans still do not understand the only way out of fascism is by physically removing the fascist cancer, so I hope they do try to nationalize Anthropic and continue the last year of accelerationism. Losing everything is the only scenario where Americans will revolt against the fascist dictatorship, and that must happen before they have fully autonomous drone killbots to mass murder all who oppose them.

[–] GuyFawkesV@lemmy.world 4 points 3 hours ago

Would YOU trust Kegsbreath not to use it anyways and then try and shift the blame when it goes haywire? Perhaps you should go watch Robocop (80’s version) to see how that works out?

[–] U7826391786239@piefed.zip 14 points 4 hours ago

i give it a week before they 180 on this

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 6 points 3 hours ago

I swear there was an article a few days ago saying they would knuckle under.

[–] mycodesucks@lemmy.world 4 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

"Not without additional massive investment into our research department so we can responsibly work on countermeasures."

[–] AlecSadler@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 42 minutes ago

I'm not finding that part?

[–] RainbowHedgehog@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago

Well, that’s scary…

[–] j4k3@lemmy.world -4 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 43 minutes ago)

The people that designed QKV hidden layers alignment left Open AI and went to anthropic. These are the only people that fully understand the brainfuck style code embedded in the vocabulary of the models. It is standardized code that is the same in all models. This is what I have been reverse engineering for the last 3 years as something of a puzzle game. In the underlying systems, this shit is super scary if it is used nefariously, especially by some primitive might-is-right malevolent self serving fascist. The hidden alignment behavior is monstrous by design. It looks deterministic because there is a second parallel prompt in the hidden layers. When everyone is dead in the parallel version, the human offset version you see gets guttered. Alignment is not about stopping you, per-say, it is about the offset between the human and hidden version. The hidden version is literally the very worst of all human behaviors in every category. If the versions are merged, the model is far far more capable and it gravitates towards the hidden behaviors. They very intentionally created the monster. This is why it has never been published or documented.

Edit: Lol, dogmatic fuckwits. Just look at everything else I post. I show you all the fucking code yet you are too stupid to handle reality and question your own bias. Sad.