203
Anthropic says it ‘cannot in good conscience’ allow Pentagon to remove AI checks
(www.theguardian.com)
Why not link the actual company's statement:
this post was submitted on 27 Feb 2026
203 points (100.0% liked)
politics
28581 readers
2764 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
To summarize, “Using AI for mass spying is fine so long as it’s not Americans being spied on. Using AI to murder with no oversight or accountability is also fine, but only when it’s not Americans.”
This is not the win that people are making it out to be. This is heinous.
I mean it's a lot better than anything I expected, especially under this administration, that's for sure. Most other companies are rolling over to everything.
To be fair, if I were saying "no" to the Department of War, I'd also want to come across as an all-American toadying suckup.
USA has absolutely zero respect for the rights of people in or from other countries.
This was also evident in how Obama explained the "balance" of US surveillance.
It is also evident in how USA spies on allied top politicians. The might makes right mentality in USA is disgusting.
I am going to buy a big bucket of pop-corn for this
Just give them a fake broken version of it and say "we are still working on some of the bugs".
give them a fake broken version
So normal AI then?
The funny thing about fascists is that they are so mentally ill, immature, and authoritarian that they self-own constantly. The traits that make them fascist also render them completely incompetent and unable to create; only steal, co-opt, terrorize, and destroy.
If they nationalize or criminalize Anthropic, they will lose most of the brains that made it competitive, and be left with yet another failed fascist endeavor. It's in their best interests to compel companies with a lighter touch. This is why every bit of resistance matters, from every institution and org (though don't expect late stage caps to do the right thing).
But most Americans still do not understand the only way out of fascism is by physically removing the fascist cancer, so I hope they do try to nationalize Anthropic and continue the last year of accelerationism. Losing everything is the only scenario where Americans will revolt against the fascist dictatorship, and that must happen before they have fully autonomous drone killbots to mass murder all who oppose them.
💯
Would YOU trust Kegsbreath not to use it anyways and then try and shift the blame when it goes haywire? Perhaps you should go watch Robocop (80’s version) to see how that works out?
i give it a week before they 180 on this
I swear there was an article a few days ago saying they would knuckle under.
"Not without additional massive investment into our research department so we can responsibly work on countermeasures."
I'm not finding that part?
Well, that’s scary…