Oh man if this passes it will be a "stunning rebuke". It won't actually do anything because the President would still have to sign it.
Wow. That'll show 'em.
this post was submitted on 01 Mar 2026
146 points (100.0% liked)
politics
28628 readers
3478 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Again, republicans can stop this at any time. They're not even slowing him down.
But then how do I get to shout about the two Democrats who I dont like?
Which is why, if Dems retake power, priority #1 has to be barring these goddamn MAGAts from ever voting again. And executing the leaders. Extreme? Yes. But nothing else fixes this and anyone saying otherwise is a moron.
Bar who from voting?
Everyone who supported the Jan 6 insurrection should be ineligible to hold office per the existing amendments, for starters.
Ideally anyone who voted Trump this go around. A vote to dismantle democracy should permanently remove their participation from it. And if they claim they didn’t know this would happen, if they were too stupid to believe the warnings after all this time democracy is better off without them.
Each of them is getting exactly what they wanted.
From days before this action occured:
Top Dems reportedly work to sabotage bill to stop Trump Iran war
https://asiatimes.com/2026/02/top-dems-reportedly-work-to-sabotage-bill-to-stop-trump-iran-war/
So if I read that right it would possibly mean ~~Sheila Cherfilus-McCormick, a representative from Florida~~ Brad Sherman of California (Sheila stepped down in November) may be the one being manipulated or doing the manipulation.
The darker side of the article seems to state several Democrats agree that attacking Iran would be a political catastrophe so if Trump did it, it may assist in regaining hold of either the Senate or the House so they would have the numbers to potentially stop future issues.
Dark Because the sacrifices that are brought to the table, but in truth.. they aren't the ones who put them on the table.
Basically, do we have the numbers to stop this? No. So should we allow it to fail spectacularly to use it to our advantage? Maybe.
Every life lost was chosen by the White Houses actions, it's crazy that representatives have to even debate how us peasants may or may not benefit by their deaths.
Im not sure where you are jumping to that. It's not like we need to bury the lede here:
Schumer, one of the top recipients of funding from the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) and other pro-Israel donors, has limited his criticisms of Trump’s war posturing to questions of procedure rather than policy.
Sr. Democrats avoided/ the vote because it's a military action Israel want the US to do. Schumer and Jefferies are practically foreign agents operating on behalf of Israel at this point. Schumer has explicitly said he works on behalf of Israel.
Because what you quoted is an opinion based on an action not being taken. Also the vote was already called for but has not yet taken place. Where as there was an action of subterfuge stated here "Multiple sources have told her that “a top Democratic HFAC staffer … deliberately inflated projections of opposition to the bipartisan measure – warning of 20 to 40 Democratic defections” in a bid to indicate the resolution would fail overwhelmingly."
Neither Jefferies or Schumer are HFAC staff members. Those members are designated regions of the world. One "Top" member presides over the Middle East and North Africa.
I thought it was Sheila but I need to correct that, she apparently stepped down in November after an indictment, it is now held by Brad Sherman, a Representative in California.
They will bend the knee and drink of Dear Leader's orange jizz.
Democratic leadership chose to wait until after the attacks to "push back"
Perfect excuse for why they couldn’t do anything this time - it was simply too late! (Donate here to stop Trump and save democracy!)
Cowards
which even George W. Bush did
Yeah, that's how a fucking ratchet works...
When we alternate parties and one party doesn't fix shit and the other isn't held responsible, they're just gonna keep doing what they're doing. Which isn't the same behavior, it's as far across the line as they can geta away with. And every time it works it sets a new line.
The obvious goal is the dissolution of Congress and that should have been clear to anyone whose paid 10 minutes attention at some point in the last 50 years.
Authoritarians will always work towards a dictatorship, it doesn't matter how many different groups pictures themselves in power, they all work towards the consolidation of power which makes it easy for every authortarian group regardless of alignment.
Thiel, musk and yarvin have been very clear that this is their goal but our governments keep giving them more of our money and power
That's been the goal longer than they've been alive...
MAGA just inherited the "progress" towards dictatorship that started before the Business Plot in the 1930s and ended when he beat Jeb! in 2015.
The accelerationissm is due to neoliberals giving up the fight on our behalf for a couple decades.