this post was submitted on 05 Mar 2026
1072 points (99.1% liked)

Microblog Memes

11031 readers
2618 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

RULES:

  1. Your post must be a screen capture of a microblog-type post that includes the UI of the site it came from, preferably also including the avatar and username of the original poster. Including relevant comments made to the original post is encouraged.
  2. Your post, included comments, or your title/comment should include some kind of commentary or remark on the subject of the screen capture. Your title must include at least one word relevant to your post.
  3. You are encouraged to provide a link back to the source of your screen capture in the body of your post.
  4. Current politics and news are allowed, but discouraged. There MUST be some kind of human commentary/reaction included (either by the original poster or you). Just news articles or headlines will be deleted.
  5. Doctored posts/images and AI are allowed, but discouraged. You MUST indicate this in your post (even if you didn't originally know). If an image is found to be fabricated or edited in any way and it is not properly labeled, it will be deleted.
  6. Absolutely no NSFL content.
  7. Be nice. Don't take anything personally. Take political debates to the appropriate communities. Take personal disagreements & arguments to private messages.
  8. No advertising, brand promotion, or guerrilla marketing.

RELATED COMMUNITIES:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 3 points 7 hours ago

I've been an Unaffiliated Independent since I first registered to vote in 1977, and I have NEVER voted for a candidate that I really like, at least not for President. Every single election has been the better of two evils, and often there wasn't even two, and often there wasn't even one. I haven't been even mildly interested in any of the candidates we've had in the 21st Century, except maybe Bernie, and he's never really had a chance anyway.

I like AOC, and a couple of others. I've swing hard into the Progressive side these days. Time to balance the scale away from Conservatives for at least a half century. I'll be dead by then.

[–] VinegarChunks@lemmus.org 9 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

Half of Americans actively vote for the more evil candidate. That’s the problem you need to fix first.

I really wish I was exaggerating but it’s hard to describe it any other way.

[–] Okokimup@lemmy.world 1 points 39 minutes ago

Half of Americans don't vote.

[–] Zink@programming.dev 6 points 7 hours ago

Yep. I enjoy hypothetical discussions about how to fix our shit to benefit humans as much as anybody else.

But that's the wall I mentally run into every time: dozens of millions of people voted for the obvious greater evil THREE consecutive times.

And these weren't some kind of bland Romney v Obama elections that were very much two sides of the same coin. They were random politician v dementia predator Hitler and roughly half of voters were smashing that pedoHitler button.

[–] brown567@sh.itjust.works 8 points 11 hours ago

Outside of the realm of politics, but one choice I've made somewhat recently that was "better of two goods" was picking a Linux distro

[–] DylanMc6@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

What about the "neutral of two mehs"?

[–] Slovene@feddit.nl 1 points 7 hours ago

I hate these filthy Neutrals, Kif. With enemies you know where they stand but with Neutrals, who knows? It sickens me.

[–] Mulligrubs@lemmy.world 11 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago)

No, it's not possible with unlimited corporate "donations".

Rs are left hand, Ds are right hand, AmazonEnronMega is the puppeteer.

They've made bribery legal, it's blatant and right out in the open. They all shared the stage, everyone clapped, thunderous applause

Voters can't out bribe them, they're too busy trying to make a living on half the pay their parents had

How will you get them to outlaw bribery again? Not legally.

(see Super PACs and Citizens United)

[–] M1ch431@slrpnk.net 5 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago)

Yes.

Anybody who says otherwise is likely (on some level) attempting to convince others to crush their hopes of a better world being possible.

[–] Hond@piefed.social 90 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Now imagine more than two choices!

[–] SargonOfACAB@slrpnk.net 20 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Living in Europe this is fairly easy te remember. None of the choices are great, but they definitely exist.

[–] idiomaddict@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (7 children)

Yeah, it’s a choice among:

all out evil

Definitely evil, but still pretending to be good. (Weirdly,they’re the only capable party, and though at least half of the stuff they champion is awful, the amount of things they get done that aren’t evil is somehow still larger than whatever good any less evil party can get done. It’s still not worth it, to be clear, it’s just a shitty quirk of this political climate.)

Doesn’t yet realize they’re evil, but they are

Half good hearted but misguided, half foreign agents trying to sow discord

Great except for one issue, will never get a high portion of the vote

Great all around, will really never get a high portion of the vote

Guess the country and guess the parties for a sense of being quick on the uptake and in on the joke.

hint for the last twoI’m in favor of giving Ukraine weapons and pro European unity

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] Jack@lemmy.ca 3 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago)

The UK also has 1st-past-the-post voting, yet polling is showing that people are rejecting their 2 big parties: Labour (liberal capitalists) and the Tories (sociopathic capitalists), in favor of Reform (psychotic capitalists) and the Green party (ethical environmentalists).

"It is infinitely better to vote for freedom and fail than to vote for slavery and succeed." - Eugene V. Debs, Appeal to Reason, 1900-10-13

"Wage-labor is but a name; wage-slavery is the fact." - Eugene V. Debs, The Socialist Party and the Working Class 1904-09-01

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SteveCC@lemmy.world 58 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (13 children)

Ranked Choice Voting.
Where we don't just have to hold our noses and pick from 2. https://represent.us/

A video about it- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TfQij4aQq1k

[–] OhNoMoreLemmy@lemmy.ml 18 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

You know what's even better? Proportional representation and an executive branch that answers directly to your elected parliament.

Ranked choice or STV just means you continue to vote against Republicans and hope for the second worst option of Democrats, but you can feel better about yourself because you put a left-wing party down as your first choice.

STV should only be used for figurehead positions with no real power.

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] takeda@lemmy.dbzer0.com 19 points 1 day ago (9 children)

Then vote in all elections including local, special, midterms and especially primaries not just general. Choose progressives.

We are where we are, because voter apathy. When you don't vote, other pick the candidates for you.

[–] not_IO@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 16 hours ago

from what I hear, depending on the state, it's not easy to vote in the US.

  • In some places you have to reregister beforehand and you don't get a reminder
  • sometimes the next place to vote is far away
  • you have to bring a lot of papers
  • the election is during workhours on like a tuesday
  • there is a huge line and it's sometimes really hot out
  • even then sometimes they delete you from the list without notifying you

especially in southern states, primarily black neighborhoods districts have extra shitty conditions to prevent black people from voting

[–] OneWomanCreamTeam@sh.itjust.works 12 points 1 day ago (3 children)

We have that voter apathy because our voting system is awful, and doesn't allow most votes to even matter. People should still vote, but that alone isn't enough to fix anything. As things are now it's damage control at best.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] frisbird@lemmy.ml 1 points 18 hours ago

You are confusing cause and effect. We have voter apathy because we are where we are. The vote-harder contingent has never once shown that it works. Every single president has presided over mass murder of innocent civilians. Every single party has approved or failed to stop mass murder. There has not been a single victory over racialized mass incarceration in 70 years. The US imprisons more of its people than almost any other country, and has a parole system twice as big as its prison system, meaning it manages the lives 3x more people with its police force than any other country on earth. It's unfathomably larger than anything the world has ever seen. It absolutely dwarfs the height of the GULAG system.

The system creates the apathy. The apathy doesn't create the system.

And I saw your other comment that not-voting won't make things better and that's true, but voting also won't make things better. So it's time to start thinking about what will make things better and time to stop funneling energy into a known ineffective solution.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] bearboiblake@pawb.social 21 points 1 day ago (10 children)

Protest and elect. Emphasis on protest.

  1. Get as involved as you can with activist efforts locally.
  2. Organize, network, focus on building solidarity.
  3. Vote at primaries for the most progressive candidate.
  4. Don't punch down
  5. Don't punch left.
load more comments (10 replies)

I'd be willing to take the worse of two goods at this point.

[–] humanspiral@lemmy.ca 3 points 22 hours ago

That would imply nice things are possible. Surely you must choose between being against mexican rapist trans pet eaters or pro mexican rapist trans pet eaters as your 2 binary options.

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago (4 children)

It’s time to give up on this idea, given the outrage culture, the death of journalism.

We could have a race of Fred Roger’s vs fred rogers and someone would find or make up a scandal and half the internet will follow. For the foreseeable future all candidates appear to be evil, whether they are different from before or not, so our choice is who appears less evil.

Then there’s the death of the platform. Candidates compete to see how little they can say, to not give their opponents anything to go on, so all future candidates will not appear to have a good platform and our choice is who is less evil

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] TehWorld@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago (8 children)

Texas just had to choose between Talarico and Crockett. Both sounded like great candidates to me and hope that Crockett can continue her path in politics (albeit without the AIPAC issue she has)

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] AI_toothbrush@lemmy.zip 6 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Thats basically communism and socialism for me. I believe socialism would be better but its two goods either way.

[–] balsoft@lemmy.ml 1 points 13 hours ago

So you believe that a dictatorship of capital, wielding the power of state violence to suppress its enemies and plan the economy, is better than a stateless, classless, moneyless society? Basically what you're saying is that USSR was the absolute peak of societal development, and while I do like many faucets of USSR I will disagree here.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›