this post was submitted on 05 Mar 2026
600 points (96.4% liked)

politics

28782 readers
2665 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] SethTaylor@lemmy.world 19 points 1 day ago (1 children)

So far it's Harris and Newsom. Cool. Cool cool cool.

No, I'm not worried at all. Who said I'm worried?

[–] lando55@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 day ago

Ugh. Maybe Mark Kelly will run? Who knows

[–] unphazed@lemmy.world 24 points 1 day ago (14 children)

No. Just no. Other countries cn rise above misogyny, but not us. Dems need to drop this whole "please the right" schtick too. We need someone actually progressive, someone who doesn't ride the Israeli money train, and alas - is male. Bonus points for not playing the "we need to forgive and forget" card either. It didn't work, and a lot of these assholes are just regurgitating the South. They lost, but never faced punishment. If we let racism slide, we let them build confidence and organize.

load more comments (14 replies)
[–] Armok_the_bunny@lemmy.world 146 points 2 days ago (19 children)

So long as there's a proper primary I don't see the harm in this, not really. I can't see her running a good enough campaign to make it through the primaries, at least not without also having a good enough campaign to beat the fascist party after Trump.

[–] flandish@lemmy.world 139 points 2 days ago (58 children)

the key here is “proper primary.” I can’t remember a time when they’ve had one that wasn’t fucked up in some way.

load more comments (58 replies)
load more comments (18 replies)
[–] BlackLaZoR@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (2 children)

So another billion dollars spent on a losing campaign?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] kmartburrito@lemmy.world 80 points 2 days ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] jonesey71@lemmus.org 13 points 1 day ago

Imagine you are so hated you are the runner up to Trump and then not having self realization and needing to get it reiterated to you at the expense of the well being of the entire country.

[–] ThomasWilliams@lemmy.world 23 points 1 day ago (9 children)

People seem to have forgotten the only reason she was the candidate was because Biden dropped out and she was the VP.

She got practically no votes in the primaries.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] altphoto@lemmy.today 16 points 1 day ago (21 children)

Oh for fuck sakes! C'mon lady! Sacrifice! Let a new face do it! There's 300 million of us. I'm sure someone else can be better than you know who. Go do something else to help democracy. I'd vote Beyonce.

load more comments (21 replies)
[–] Telorand@reddthat.com 84 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Are you fucking stupid? You lost to Donald Fucking Trump—you know, the racist, fascist pedophile rapist? You lost to that guy, and you'd be running against his specter and his legacy, the racist and xenophobic sentiments that still run deep in this country.

What is uniting the American people, however, is a rising class consciousness, not establishment Dems like you. We already tried voting for "not-Trump," and y'all squandered the opportunity to appease the wealthy, expand the police state, send more bombs to Israel, and treat all the people shouting "Danger!" like children, rather than securing our democracy and standing against genocide.

Fuck. Right. Off.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] bearboiblake@pawb.social 19 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Either there will be a socialist president in 2028 or democracy will be dissolved by 2036.

It's gonna get dissolved then lmao, but imho it's happening right now it will be complete before the midterms.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Adderbox76@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I'm not saying she should.

But the "I fucking told you so" campaign strategy might actually be somewhat effective for a certain percentage of swing voters.

[–] PrettyFlyForAFatGuy@feddit.uk 7 points 1 day ago (2 children)

assuming that fair elections are still a thing at that time i'd say she would be guaranteed the win.

which of course is exactly why they're bringing this Dem stooge back.

after all it is her turn

What do you mean fair elections? AIPAC would still get their puppet. Just from the other side of the aisle.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] TwilitSky@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

That strategy would be effective in pushing them toward candidates and parties that don't them swallow their ego and admit mistakes as a condition of support.

[–] demizerone@lemmy.world 32 points 2 days ago (1 children)

People that lose to Donald fucking Trump should fuck off forever.

[–] OrteilGenou@lemmy.world 17 points 1 day ago

At this point, that's pretty much all of us

[–] TigerAce@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 1 day ago

"I gave away the presidency to Trump, so I'm going to try it again"

[–] BeardededSquidward@lemmy.blahaj.zone 29 points 2 days ago (7 children)

They'll do everything but what will actually get them elected willingly. Neo-liberals need to wake up and realize it's either going to have progress away from capitalism or just all of us drowning in fascism because they refuse much needed and necessary change.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] ThePowerOfGeek@lemmy.world 49 points 2 days ago (16 children)

I mean, she'd be better than Trump. But that's such a ridiculously low bar.

Surely the Dems can come up with a better candidate that her, Gavin Newsom, or some similarly uninspiring/greasy candidate. Right? Right???

load more comments (16 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›