this post was submitted on 08 Mar 2026
155 points (100.0% liked)

politics

28830 readers
2275 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Voters give Trump higher marks on border security, but they disapprove of his handling of several key issues, according to a national NBC News poll.

Majorities of registered voters disapprove of how Donald Trump has handled the issues that defined the first months of a tumultuous midterm election year, as Democrats maintain an advantage in the battle for control of Congress, according to a new national NBC News poll.

Voters give Trump poor marks for his handling of immigration after his administration surged federal agents into the heart of American cities and immigration officers in Minnesota killed two U.S. citizens in January. They are down on his tariffs after the Supreme Court struck down his main tariff program in February and Trump later reimposed some of those levies.

And they don’t like his actions on Iran, with the U.S. now at war with the nation after Trump ordered strikes starting last weekend — strikes a majority say should not have happened.

all 32 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] pirate2377@lemmy.zip 3 points 5 hours ago

Democrats are so bad that a president dragging us into a war for little to no reason still has a chance in the midterms at all...

[–] RampantParanoia2365@lemmy.world 5 points 7 hours ago

Are you fucking joking? This is the exact same approval rating he's always fucking had. Why are you making note of this? OP, I'm asking you. Explain.

[–] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 111 points 1 day ago (3 children)

44% approved?!?

jesus fucking christian lobotomy

[–] Atropos@lemmy.world 36 points 1 day ago (1 children)

We have a MASSIVE propaganda and critical thinking crisis here in the states.

It is jaw dropping how otherwise normal people can have such disgusting views.

[–] stylusmobilus@aussie.zone 4 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

massive propaganda and critical thinking crisis

Looks like a moral failing and irresponsibility crisis to me

[–] CarnivorousCouch@lemmy.world 2 points 6 hours ago

I don't know that couching this as many cases of personal moral failure and irresponsibility is productive when so many are affected. It's like when conservatives discuss poverty - certainly, many among the affected group could make better choices, but shouldn't we be motivated to understand what led to their failure from a systematic perspective?

And this is why the problems in America will not be easily solved. There won't be a solution in the (if they happen) midterms. There won't be a solution in the (if it happens) next election.

The problem of 40+% of the population supporting Trump remains. And it will remain, whether it's the causes of it or the reality of it. And it will not simply fade away.

This large of a population supporting these policies is a crisis of catastrophic proportions.

[–] panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 49 points 1 day ago (7 children)

So if you line up 20 random Americans, just 9 will say Trump is doing a great job.

[–] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 1 points 6 hours ago

More likely all 20 will say they love or hate him, depending on where they live.

[–] Theprogressivist@lemmy.world 33 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Fucking pathetic ain't it?

[–] Bluegrass_Addict@lemmy.ca 13 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

or it's just lies / extremely confusing terminology being used

[–] Lydon_Feen@lemmy.world 18 points 1 day ago (2 children)

i think you meant to say that if you line up 20 random americans, 9 of them should be commited to a psych ward.

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

a modern one or a 1940s one?

[–] Lydon_Feen@lemmy.world 2 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

The sadist in me wants to say 1940's.

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 2 points 7 hours ago

how barbaric! we should be friends.

[–] Soulphite@reddthat.com 11 points 1 day ago

Because those 9 probably watch Faux News (Fox News) and the likes... which is just propaganda for this regimes agenda. Now, unfortunately the other news media has been compromised and are starting to bend the knee as well. We'll start seeing an incline in the pedophiles approval especially if a "terrorist attack perpetrated by Iran were to happen on US soil" which the sane bunch of us will know would be absolute bullshit and fabricated by the regime.

[–] BillyClark@piefed.social 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Hey let's not go lining up random Americans. If you're insistent on lining Americans up, stick to those nine people you mentioned.

[–] Oisteink@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That's not how they do it themselves though.

[–] stylusmobilus@aussie.zone 2 points 7 hours ago

But they’re different, remember?

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Or as the cons like to say: "a mandate".

those conservative cis het white men would love a secret man date

[–] 0li0li@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Just? That's way to many!

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 22 points 1 day ago

"trump barely is behind in the polls for a cornucopia of huge issues that he's about as bad as can possibly be on"

I wish it made sense.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Honestly, what was the issue with the border before? I keep seeing Republicans and plenty of reactionary centrists say that Donvict "closed the border because Joe had an open border policy".

What are they even talking about?

[–] watson387@sopuli.xyz 16 points 1 day ago

They're full of shit. They're calling asylum seekers illegals because Trump told MAGA that means they were let out of an insane asylum in another country and Biden brought them here to vote. It's a ridiculous premise and he just makes up the numbers as he goes.

[–] IchNichtenLichten@lemmy.wtf 4 points 1 day ago

It's a useful tool in that the vast majority of Americans don't have any personal insight into what's going on so if a right-wing rag tells them the borders are wide open and terrorist rapist serial killers are pouring in, many are inclined to buy that.

What we're seeing now is MAGA trying to reconcile that invisible threat with actual problems like the cost of food, gas, housing, healthcare, etc.

[–] hammertime@lemmy.org 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This is the exact reason there won’t be a blue wave in November—even if there is a fair election.

Get out while you still can.

[–] RampantParanoia2365@lemmy.world 1 points 7 hours ago

I mean, why not? It's not like the approval was literally any different last blue wave? It's always ~60/40. Always.