this post was submitted on 10 Mar 2026
754 points (98.0% liked)

Political Memes

11324 readers
2073 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

1) Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

2) No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

3) Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

4) No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

5) No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Mrkawfee@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago
[–] Ilovethebomb@sh.itjust.works 24 points 1 day ago (24 children)

Does Iran actually have the capability to close the Strait though? I thought every naval asset they have has been flattened.

[–] OwOarchist@pawb.social 20 points 1 day ago

Oil tankers tend to be a pretty risk-averse group. They're not going to risk getting hit and having their multi-million dollar cargo go up in flames, even if the risk of getting hit while transiting the strait is relatively low.

[–] sharkfucker420@lemmy.ml 20 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Considering it has signficantly affected oil prices. Yes.

A large amount of ships are currently stuck in the persian gulf. A significant portion of this is because they do not want to take the risk. The threat is enough to be effective but Iran is also enforcing it.

[–] CADmonkey@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

All you have to do is scare the money people.

[–] ThePowerOfGeek@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (3 children)

I've been wondering the same thing.

It's a baller thing to say. But if they've lost air superiority (or even if it's compromised) then it doesn't mean much.

[–] Substance_P@lemmy.world 42 points 1 day ago (3 children)

I read somewhere that Iran can close the strait without a full-scale naval engagement using selective drone strikes and harassing vessels, Iran triggers a spike in maritime insurance premiums which will choke shipping companies. Also because of the narrow width of the strait, also shallow, Iran can use mines, they have both simple contact mines to sophisticated "smart" mines, apparently they possesses one of the largest naval mine inventories in the world.

[–] ThePowerOfGeek@lemmy.world 22 points 1 day ago

Those are fair points. They don't need to block all targeted traffic. They just have to be enough of a threat/pain in the ass for transportation and insurance rates to go up to an uncomfortable level. It's all about threat and perception.

Sure, the US air force and navy could bomb the shit out of their artillery placements. But given how (relatively) cheap and effective drones are, that might not be as effective as it seems at first.

[–] CADmonkey@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

How shallow? If a ship gets sunk would that be another obstacle?

[–] Bronzebeard@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 day ago

Losing Air superiority doesn't mean their artillery stops working.

[–] auraithx@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 day ago

They don’t need naval assets all they need to do is give the green light to Russian proxies who will lay mines and knock it out of action for years.

load more comments (19 replies)
[–] MrSulu@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 day ago

Gansta for Iran, but typical Trump style

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›