this post was submitted on 12 Mar 2026
237 points (98.4% liked)

politics

28883 readers
2246 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Trump has promised to endorse Jake Paul if the controversial YouTuber-turned-boxer ever runs for office.

Trump made the remarks yesterday during a speech at a packaging facility in Kentucky, after being joined on stage by the influencer.

The president’s declaration of support followed a brief speech by Paul, who later posted a video of the pair hitting Trump’s now infamous YMCA dance.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Lushed_Lungfish@lemmy.ca 9 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Trump should demonstrate his support for by getting his face bashed in by a black boxer.

[–] IchNichtenLichten@lemmy.wtf 4 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

I'm neither black, nor a boxer but I'm available.

[–] MrVilliam@sh.itjust.works 2 points 17 hours ago

If a group of people states that they don't condone violence and don't accept responsibility for this, but offers to crowdfund legal defense for this, is that criminal?

I'm just asking questions.

[–] rosco385@lemmy.wtf 10 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Is that film-a-dead-guy Paul, or fake-boxer Paul?

[–] generic_computers@lemmy.zip 2 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

Those are different people? /s

[–] sturmblast@lemmy.world 13 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Two of the dumbest criminals in modern history

[–] FatVegan@leminal.space 5 points 20 hours ago

If they would've grown up in a sane county, no one would know who the broke rapist who sits in jail and the egg farmer's helping hand was.

[–] FiniteBanjo@feddit.online 101 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I really thought Jake Paul would dissapear from public perception after the suicide forest incident but instead its always getting fucking worse with that guy. Gonna piss on his grave.

[–] HazardousBanjo@lemmy.world 60 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Jake and Logan Paul are the archetypical rich kids who grew to be narcissistic and functionally sociopathic.

Those two assholes would never shy away from the spotlight. And the dumbfuck iPad kids who grew up idolizing them remain as their loyal incel fanbase to this day.

Also, not that it matters because they're basically the same person, but that was Logan Paul who did the Suicide Forrest video.

[–] meco03211@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Which one got their jaw broken?

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 3 points 19 hours ago

Bust the other guy's jaw, so we don't have to ask that question.

[–] lemmyng@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] Hideakikarate@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 day ago

At :20 you can see the fear in is eyes as he's about to just eat the right hook. Glorious shot.

[–] inari@piefed.zip 34 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The suicide forest one is Logan Paul. Jake Paul is the one who got his jaw smashed

[–] nova_ad_vitum@lemmy.ca 52 points 1 day ago (5 children)

I literally refuse to learn the difference between them

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 1 points 19 hours ago

I'm sorry I even know who they are.

[–] 13igTyme@piefed.social 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Just make sure you don't confuse them with Paul Logan.

Also I agree and also refuse to learn the difference between them.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Harvey656@lemmy.world 25 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Just when you think things couldnt possibly any dumber.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 4 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Oh...we haven't seen Ted Nugent yet.

[–] moonshadow@slrpnk.net 1 points 18 hours ago

GWB's "miss me yet?" merch but with the nuge

[–] clif@lemmy.world 4 points 23 hours ago

I was positive this was going to be the onion.

... I really wish this was the onion.

[–] mthomson@forum.macaque.social 28 points 1 day ago

Every time I think America has hit rock bottom, Trump pulls out the jackhammer and tries to dig deeper.

[–] 100_kg_90_de_belin@feddit.it 4 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago)

What can Jake Paul's credibility among far-right people be after a Black person broke his face? How could Paul protect MAGA women and children from the horde of non-whites if he couldn't even defend himself?

[–] Mastengwe@sh.itjust.works 32 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Reality has become a fucking cartoon.

[–] MerryJaneDoe@lemmy.world 1 points 18 hours ago

It always was. But thanks to information technology, everyone now has a front row set to the clown show.

[–] billwashere@lemmy.world 3 points 21 hours ago

I wouldn’t nominate Jack Paul to be a gong farmer… actually I take that back. That’s exactly what he should be doing.

[–] MrSelfDestruct25@fedinsfw.app 34 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago

100% not the gay national anthem.

[–] blitzen@lemmy.ca 25 points 1 day ago (5 children)

Surly a Trump endorsement means political death nearly everywhere, no?

[–] Beero@lemmy.world 4 points 23 hours ago

Sir, I hate to disappoint, but you've actually crossed into the timeline where politicians in the next decade will actually compete at how many babies they can eat at one sitting. The mask is off....

[–] HocEnimVeni@lemmy.world 25 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Buddy I can tell you haven't been to the south recently

[–] blitzen@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 day ago

https://www.forbes.com/sites/saradorn/2024/06/26/rough-night-for-trump-endorsed-candidates-3-trump-backed-gop-picks-lost-primaries/

Correct me if I’m wrong, but I seem to see more of these types of stories than the opposite.

Too many Trump aligned candidates seem to win, but I seem to see candidates lose when Trump vocally endorses them. To wit, Hershall Walker.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] MerryJaneDoe@lemmy.world 1 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (1 children)

Maybe you haven't checked the polls lately.

The president had an 83% approval among Republicans, a 3% approval among Democrats and a 28% approval among independent voters, as well as a 48% approval among men and 28% approval among women. The survey also found that 53% of voters oppose military action in Iran, 40% support it and 7% are undecided.

https://kfanplus.iheart.com/content/2026-03-13-trumps-approval-rating-compared-to-2028-democratic-frontrunners-revealed/

83% approval from his base. Crazy. The rich boomers LOVE war.

[–] blitzen@lemmy.ca 1 points 18 hours ago

Another poster made a great point that, however well Trump does and continues to do in polls of his base, that support isn't necessarily transferrable to other candidates. And indeed, often it's counter intuitively counter productive.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 1 points 19 hours ago

That's the trend. An endorsement might help in the Primary, but it's death in the General.

After the Midterm bloodbath, MAGA candidates will understand that Trump is a liability, and will not be seeking Trump's endorsement. We might even see anti-MAGA Republican campaigns.

[–] HazardousBanjo@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago (1 children)

About 1/3rd of the US is still vehemently supporting Trump.

Don't underestimate how massive (nor incredibly fucking stupid) the cult is.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] MrSulu@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 day ago

Send in AJ to break his jaw

[–] robocall@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago (5 children)

What policies do these two people agree on?

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 21 hours ago

Jake Paul doesn't have any policies.

[–] TheFogan@programming.dev 27 points 1 day ago

Keep crypto scams going! Also trump doesn't know policy anyway, he just signs what his handlers ask him to.

[–] MajinBlayze@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

What makes you think that that's relevant? Neither of them run on policy

[–] robocall@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] MajinBlayze@lemmy.world 3 points 23 hours ago

Fair enough

[–] Godort@lemmy.ca 11 points 1 day ago

If you're rich, you should be immune from consequences of any kind

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Fizz@lemmy.nz 9 points 1 day ago

Clown timeline

load more comments
view more: next ›