this post was submitted on 13 Mar 2026
50 points (100.0% liked)

Canada

11715 readers
521 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] sbv@sh.itjust.works 24 points 1 hour ago (2 children)

The decline was led by youth aged 15 to 24 years old, with a drop of 47,000.

It's like we're dead set on radicalizing our youth. :(

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago) (2 children)

Hopefully we'll get an alternative voice to PP who can talk to young Canadians when the NDP leadership election is done. One that would offer them believable material improvements.

[–] West_of_West@piefed.social 2 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

I'm hoping for Ashton, I think him being a worker will bring some actual legitimacy to a labour party. Unfortunately we'll probably get Lewis who seems about the same as Singh.

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 2 points 46 minutes ago* (last edited 44 minutes ago)

I voted Rob first, Avi second. I think while Avi looks Singh-like at first glance, is very different ideologically and when examined in detail or listened to. But if he's elected leader, he must convince you of that himself.

[–] sbv@sh.itjust.works 2 points 51 minutes ago (1 children)

Fingers crossed. But I'm not holding my breath.

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 1 points 49 minutes ago

Skepticism is super warranted. Skepticism of the mind, optimism of the will!

[–] Willoughby@piefed.world 4 points 1 hour ago

Left radical? (:

oh

oh

):

[–] Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 hour ago

Instead of this number, I wish we used something more comprehensive, like total hours worked, average income/wage and labour participation rate.

The current metric only counts those looking for work.

[–] AndriiZvorygin@helpos.ca 3 points 1 hour ago (2 children)

I'm very confused by why it says 84k lost, but then it says 100k full time were lost. then wouldn't the job losses be at least 100k?

[–] Lemmyoutofhere@lemmy.ca 1 points 23 minutes ago* (last edited 23 minutes ago)

Not if part time jobs increased.

[–] RandAlThor@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 hour ago

I think they are talking about gross losses in one number, the total is net I believe.