this post was submitted on 14 Aug 2025
126 points (99.2% liked)

politics

25238 readers
2770 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 13 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Awesome. That's right, MAGA Morons, go after reefer, and wake up the sleeping giant of young people.

We should make this a major deal, and have Dem candidates declare that they will support full legalization. It will attract FAR more votes than it loses, and MANY of this votes will be first timers.

[–] RagingRobot@lemmy.world 6 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

They should have supported full legalization from the very start. Almost everyone supports it yet no politician ever really cared. It never made sense.

[–] otacon239@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago

It makes sense when you can easily put someone into forced labor for years for having a normal amount of it on them.

[–] bitwolf@sh.itjust.works 14 points 11 hours ago

I'd rather my kid smell marijuana than smell cigarettes.

I'd rather my kid grow up and smoke weed, then get blacked out on Whiskey. And I like whiskey.

[–] froggycar360@slrpnk.net 3 points 8 hours ago

I like that people don’t get arrested for weed anymore, but I also don’t like the gentrification of it. I don’t want to buy weed from a VC funded apple store.

[–] quick_snail@feddit.nl 19 points 14 hours ago

No country of potheads has ever thrived, or ever achieved anything at all.

Dude's obviously never been to Silicon Valley, lol.

[–] Roopappy@lemmy.world 32 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Honestly, it wasn't that hard to get illegal marijuana. All this will do is cut tax revenue and increase crime.

[–] monkeyslikebananas2@lemmy.world 24 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Republicans don’t actually want to stop crime. They want to act like tough guys, punish those they don’t like and make sure their “team” can get away with crimes.

[–] ameancow@lemmy.world 11 points 14 hours ago

If anything, they REALLY want an "easy" crime to crack down on, so this is why they are making literally everything illegal, like porn and weed and having a penis in the wrong room or glancing at a cop without a smile on your face.

[–] SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world 1 points 9 hours ago

Lol good luck

[–] AcidiclyBasicGlitch@sh.itjust.works 19 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (1 children)

“Our society thrived when everyone was smoking cigarettes and drinking whiskey,” wrote Daily Wire commentator Matt Walsh, completely ignoring the countless, well-documented, negative impacts (violence and death) of those two American vices. “We became the most powerful nation in the world with liquor and nicotine. No country of potheads has ever thrived, or ever achieved anything at all. Every city that legalized it became an even bigger shithole basically overnight. The entire history of western civilization tells us that marijuana is far, far worse for society.”

Dumbest fucking take I've read regarding weed in the U.S. in probably the past two decades. This is another one of those things that's like so low on the list of outrageous things that require attention right now, but it's just so fucking unbelievably dumb that it somehow becomes salient enough to be noticable above the chaos that is the normal background.

The way he is so confidently trying to gaslight society like an overbearing parent, as if we have no frame of reference regarding marijuana policy other than what we learned in D.A.R.E.

Those shithole cities with their absurd abundance of tax revenue from marijuana sales.

Opioid sparing effects in Medicare enrollees with access to medical marijuana.

Fewer lives ruined due to a reduction of nonviolent incarceration rates.

I'm not sure what kind of utopia Matt Walsh believes he is advocating for by rolling back even more evidence based progress, but it sounds like a shithole.

[–] zalgotext@sh.itjust.works 11 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

He wants to go back to a "utopia" where it's ok to beat your wife

[–] Dogiedog64@lemmy.world 1 points 17 hours ago

~~Its ok ~~ It's EXPECTED to beat your wife, how dare she get uppity??? /s

[–] bier@feddit.nl 1 points 9 hours ago

Well he just lost his genz voters! Also lots of other generations.

[–] yarr@feddit.nl 5 points 17 hours ago

Matt Walsh is one of the most smarmy fucks around. I swear, some people listen to him because he has a nice haircut and smile.

I only wish he was older, like Trump, so we wouldn't expect to have him on the earth for another two decades.

Trying to rewind the USA back to when we were all smoking cigarettes and drinking whisky is insane.

[–] 5in1k@lemmy.zip 11 points 20 hours ago

I’m so sick of these fucking dweebs and I don’t want to share oxygen with them anymore.

[–] QueenHawlSera@sh.itjust.works 15 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

A guy at my work place swore that Trump was about to legalize pot

[–] frezik@lemmy.blahaj.zone 12 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Which does have backing. This is coming out because Trump said he wanted to reschedule THC. Not all of MAGA is behind this.

Anyway, release the Epstein files.

[–] QueenHawlSera@sh.itjust.works 2 points 9 hours ago

Between rescheduling THC and calling the UK out on its bullshit, Trump's dangerously close to being chill for once...

....Is what I'd say if this shit wasn't going on Points to ICE treating brown skin like a crime in and of itself Oh and ya know those threats to send the military into blue states...

[–] quick_snail@feddit.nl 2 points 14 hours ago

Read the article. He is talking about changing its schedule, yes.

[–] quick_snail@feddit.nl 2 points 15 hours ago

Lol. This is probably the only reason people haven't revolted. Take away this, and they'll overthrow you.

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 54 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (6 children)

No country of pot heads ever thrived

Uh... Dude doesn't even know US history. Our biggest cultivated product pre-revolution was hemp. Several founding fathers, including Washington, cultivated and consumed cannabis. We are a country of pot heads. While the driving forces to ban it here were entirely because of racism and greed.

[–] paraphrand@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago

I guess they might also want to revert back to the glory days when the nation was so consistently and pervasively drunk off its ass that prohibition actually passed.

Trump has never once in his life made an effort to know a single thing, and if there's one thing he knows the least about, it's the history of the country he leads.

[–] FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 day ago (6 children)

So Hamilton was probably a stoner? Cool!

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Chainweasel@lemmy.world 42 points 1 day ago
[–] quick_snail@feddit.nl 1 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

Last Friday it was reported that Trump told donors at an event that he is considering reclassifying marijuana from its current Schedule I level

That contradicts the title. Trump is looking at making it more legal, not less.

[–] skozzii@lemmy.ca 6 points 14 hours ago

Trump said, "I've heard great things with it and medical, and terrible things with it and everything else"

So the plan would be to allow medical licenses for the rich white folks while cracking down on everyone else.

[–] spaghettiwestern@sh.itjust.works 2 points 12 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Nasan@sopuli.xyz 4 points 11 hours ago

Today I learned that the DEA doesn't consider weed to have accepted medical use while cocaine does for the same use case (pain relief).

[–] ieatpwns@lemmy.world 23 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Can’t have people getting high and start being introspective and caring about others

[–] RisingSwell@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Ngl I smoke pot to stop thinking, not start it.

[–] FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca 1 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)

I use weed to not feel as much emotion while I think things through. It does sometimes distort my thinking though

[–] FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 day ago

Can't have people get high and start thinking

No shit, it's a fantastic excuse to arrest and detain/deport people for holding plants while you're out there obliterating 4th amendment rights.

load more comments
view more: next ›