this post was submitted on 17 Mar 2026
342 points (99.7% liked)

politics

28935 readers
1999 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 35 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ReluctantlyZen@ani.social 2 points 10 hours ago

Gee, whatever happened to wanting a meritocracy?

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 7 points 16 hours ago

[Defense attorneys grinning, and rubbing their hands gleefully]

[–] crystalmerchant@lemmy.world 6 points 16 hours ago

Was not aware they had an experience requirement

[–] IchNichtenLichten@lemmy.wtf 9 points 19 hours ago

Finally my diploma from the Arkansas School of Real Good Lawyerin' is going to be of use.

[–] BigMacHole@thelemmy.club 146 points 1 day ago (1 children)

We're SLASHING DEI so we can FINALLY hire Lawyers WITHOUT any Lawyer Experience!

-Republicans?

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Well, at least there isn't any homo and no nCLANGers!

[–] daychilde@lemmy.world 2 points 17 hours ago

No, gol-dangit dag-nabbit, I-uh said the sheriff was a niBONGGGGGG

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 4 points 16 hours ago

"As long as you're breathing, well take you."

"Nah, I'll pass."

[–] P1k1e@lemmy.world 12 points 20 hours ago

Oh sure, that'll get those cases won

[–] Ironfist79@lemmy.world 9 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

We're so fucked. Three more years of this crap, at least.

[–] BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world 2 points 19 hours ago

As long as we don't start appointing Judges with zero experience this is a win.

[–] DandomRude@piefed.social 62 points 1 day ago (4 children)

I mean, the Secretary of Education is a wrestling promoter and she’s by no means the only completely unqualified member of the administration. The entire cabinet is like that: from MMA fighters to conspiracy theorists - it’s a grotesque, full-blown clown show.

But hey, it won't be easy to find even halfway decent lawyers for this job anyway, given that working for this attorney general will most likely make you liable to prosecution.

[–] Mirshe@lemmy.world 17 points 23 hours ago (2 children)

The FBI director is a podcaster, the HHS secretary is...whatever RFK Jr did before (the word "failson" comes to mind).

[–] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 6 points 21 hours ago

I think his educational qualifications were as an environmental lawyer. But failson fits him on both a practical and spiritual level, though king of the crackheads would also work.

[–] NABDad@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago

"Remember how difficult it was for you to pass the bar? Come work for us and we'll get you disbarred before you know what hit you!"

[–] D_C@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 day ago

Rubbish. Next you'll be telling me that the Secretary of WAR is an alcoholic, ~~nazi~~Christian nationalist tattoo covered, pundit from Faux News...
UNPOSSIBLE!!

[–] kandoh@reddthat.com 6 points 19 hours ago

They're running out of lawyers

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 43 points 1 day ago (1 children)

LOL, of course they did.

Everything about this stupid hack and his administration is total clown shoes.

[–] grimpy@lemmy.myserv.one 14 points 1 day ago (1 children)

including the ginormous Florsheims

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 3 points 20 hours ago

Yes, the fact that they are wearing gigantic shoes is very apropos.

[–] just_another_person@lemmy.world 33 points 1 day ago (1 children)

So like...same as the other moronic tools they've been hiring. Got it.

[–] Remember_the_tooth@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

They had experience in primary school. This next round is going to be fully illiterate.

[–] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 23 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You can't be held back by the constitution if you can't read the constitution.

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Probably because they don't find enough qualified people who drop morals and regards for the law when told to do so.

[–] Cort@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago

Nobody's willing to take a contempt charge for the planned incompetence of their bosses

[–] ruuster13@lemmy.zip 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Rebranding DEI to "didn't educate itself"

[–] grimpy@lemmy.myserv.one 8 points 1 day ago

Don’t Ever Improve

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago

Bwhaha.

This is gonna end well.

[–] takeda@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 1 day ago

I think this is related: https://youtu.be/434iXhWZg0M

Please leave a comment under that change as directed: https://www.regulations.gov/document/DOJ-OAG-2026-0001-0001

They have problems getting experienced prosecutors do illegal shit, so this is the strategy to achieve that.

[–] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

What do you mean,they hire by merit? Remember? When they cut "revered" generals/members for news hosts

[–] BeigeAgenda@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 day ago

Don't they still need to pass the Bar exam in the state where they want to go to court?

[–] grimpy@lemmy.myserv.one 3 points 1 day ago

“We don’ need no stinkin’ badges!!!”