this post was submitted on 19 Mar 2026
578 points (99.1% liked)

politics

29001 readers
1760 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Donald Trump’s authoritarian drift in his second term places the country on a par with Hungary or Turkey, according to a ranking by Sweden’s V-Dem Institute

Democratic backsliding is advancing in the developed world. The annual report from Sweden's V-Dem Institute leaves no room for doubt: almost a quarter of the world experienced democratic backsliding, or a shift towards autocratization, in 2025, and six of the 10 newly regressive countries identified in the research are located in Europe and North America, including G-7 powers such as Italy, the United Kingdom, and the United States.

But the most unsettling conclusion reached by the Swedish institute is that the United States


once a proud beacon of the more or less free world


is no longer a liberal democracy and is now on a par with countries like Hungary or Turkey, thanks to President Donald Trump. Autocracy is also spreading throughout Europe, but its reach extends far beyond the Old Continent: 41% of the world's population (3.4 billion people) now live in countries where democracy is eroding.

The institute, which belongs to the University of Gothenburg and uses 48 metrics in its evaluation, is one of the most reliable sources when it comes to rating the state of governments around the world, and the conclusion of its 2026 study confirms the worst fears about the authoritarian drift of the U.S. under Trump's leadership.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] AdolfSchmitler@lemmy.world 11 points 2 days ago (2 children)

He's making moves like he's expecting to be around another 50 years when he probably has 10 at the most. I'm way more afraid of who he might be paving the way for.

[–] teyrnon@sh.itjust.works 9 points 2 days ago (3 children)

No way he has 10 years in him. Motherfucker is mentally gone as is. Weekend at Bernie's.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 days ago

Those red neck scars are an attempt to relieve his dementia with a blood flow stent.

[–] ugandan_airways@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 day ago

I don’t think he is going to last his whole term. He looks like absolute shit, and sounds even worse. Fuck, he makes Biden’s last years look energetic. And Biden was a fucking reanimated corpse.

[–] SoloPhoenyx@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

The DNC made damn sure we wouldn't have one minute at Bernie's let alone an entire weekend.

[–] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

He could die tomorrow. Pandora's Box is already open.

For the remainder of our lives we will see copycat politicians who strip more and more of our rights away when they gain power because they all watched and saw and know they can do what Trump did and more without suffering repercussions.

America put up a big sign letting them all know we are too weak to make them pay. They will take advantage. Why wouldn't they?

[–] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

Weird how everyone who was told they were overreacting are not being told that anymore.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 17 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (6 children)

I can remember when lots of the reactionary centrists and not a few on the left, oh, and of course, the right wing blow-hards, were playing Tone Police for everyone in 2016, and 2020 and again in 2024: lecturing us all about how uncivil it all was to be talking about fascism in relation to conservatives.

I wonder where all the WELLACKTUALLY guys are now.

[–] stylusmobilus@aussie.zone 2 points 1 day ago

lecturing us

Also about not understanding the law system, that it takes time and Trump was done. Really condescending shit. I noticed just before I got permabanned from Reddit that they were disappearing or gone.

[–] VinnyDaCat@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

not a few on the left,

Nah, was a lot actually. I know a lot of people that were really upset after the election and after the first few months. Then it stopped being a problem. "You're overreacting." "Don't think about it." "We'll be fine next election."

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Arachnidbrilliant@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 2 days ago (2 children)

All right, everybody needs pitchforks and torches. And we need four horses with four long ropes

[–] SoloPhoenyx@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

Why do you think almost the entire cabinet lives on military bases.

[–] teyrnon@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 days ago

Or, instead of the horses, and hear me out, we just need some green saplings maybe 20 feet tall and some rope in a sort of circle around a spot...

[–] Nikko882@lemmy.world 76 points 3 days ago (4 children)

Let's be honest, the US was no shining beacon of democracy even before Trump. The system was rotten and everyone knew it. However, those with the power to change it have no incentive to do so. It was basically held up because the poeple in charge had some common decency. At that point it's just a matter of time before someone came along that didn't have this basic decency.

I think the people of the UK should take a long, hard look at how the situation has evolved in the US and decide if they want to change their system to avoid having only two parties dominate the political climate. Ironically, being a monarchy means they are probably more resistant to going down the same route, but I suspect the parties are going to get more radical as time goes on and the royals aren't terribly popular these days.

(Opinion to be taken with a pinch of salt. I am no expert in these things and don't live in either country; We've got our own radicalization and issues with our own democracy.)

[–] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 3 points 2 days ago

the poeple in charge had some common decency.

The people in charge were scared of the public a little bit. It was not their decency that was stopping them, it was the danger of losing next elections if they took it too far. Bush attacked Iraq and he didn't lie about the WMDs out of decency. He lied to cover his ass. Lindsey Graham was the same guy he is now back then. He didn't lose his decency along the way. He realized he can be himself and people will still vote for him.

[–] KneeTitts@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

the US was no shining beacon of democracy even before Trump

he didnt create that corrupt system, hes just taking advantage of it..

actually he and the other pedo billionaires did help to create the corrupt system who am I kidding?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] HermitBee@feddit.uk 7 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I think the people of the UK should take a long, hard look at how the situation has evolved in the US and decide if they want to change their system to avoid having only two parties dominate the political climate.

There are currently 5 parties vying for position here, but your point is still generally true. Hopefully with the rise of smaller parties, we might start to see a move towards a more proportional system, but I'm not holding my breath.

[–] MisterFrog@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (1 children)

There are currently 5 parties vying for position here

I know you're not disagreeing, but I find it absolutely hilarious (in a bad way) that UK political parties will put out flyers of who is most likely to win, as a way to convince people to vote for them.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=zDLxgEquxA0

All while having rejected bringing in preferential voting at a referendum, not even that long ago.

As an Australian, may I say, you royally fucked up on that one. We have issues in our electoral system too, (mostly around lower house electorates being single-member, and not say 3-member to more accurately represent the electorate), but thank Christ we have preferential voting.

[–] HermitBee@feddit.uk 1 points 3 hours ago

As an Australian, may I say, you royally fucked up on that one.

I take exception to that. The law which allowed for the referendum required Royal Assent, but that is the same law which would have allowed for the implementation of preferential voting. It was the statutory repealing of that law where things really went bad.

I would say we statutorily fucked it up.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 33 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (6 children)

Worldwide, democracy has regressed to its lowest levels since the mid-1970s

I've been saying over and over again here, that it's generally been going backwards since the 70's. This goes for democracy, respect for human rights and minorities, and the peace movement.

And many people here simply don't believe it. (I'm guessing younger ones)

[–] ChillPenguin@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago (2 children)

It's not just younger ones. I talk to a large group of boomers and they are all in the same boat of "everything is fine, we'll just vote the next election. We've had presidents like this before."

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

We’ve had presidents like this before.”

On that they are seriously mistaken, of course there have been bad presidents like Bush, but Trump is a whole new class of bad.
I hope they are right, and that all this can be solved by a simple election, but I'm not betting on it.

[–] ChillPenguin@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Yeah I really don't think so. The damage is already done to democracy. I can believe we used to have a shared common decency. But it's been rotting for a while now.

Plus boomers aren't known for actually fixing problems. The things I bring up to them, their responses are always like "well we will figure it out sometime" as they continue doing what they want. So uhhh... I don't have a lot of confidence.

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

Isn't it about time the next generation begins to take responsibility.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] partofthevoice@lemmy.zip 11 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (7 children)

Let’s talk about what this really means, though. Why would that happen?

Could it be anything like:

  • Because power is a fickle structure by nature and therefore democracy is an unstable system?
  • Because technology advanced so fast that it yields control to whomever sits at its forefront?
  • Because society chose not to make theoretical laws for technology that had yet been invented?
  • Because (e.g., Russian) state propaganda was allowed to become so powerful that it actually destabilized global democracy?
  • Because we were naïvely assuming we had a stable democracy, when in fact we never really did — it just hadn’t been under enough stress to show its flaws?
  • Because institutional capitalism with monarch style governance is an economic system that necessarily leads to authoritarianism?
  • Because the libertarian value tolerance of debate is an ill founded ideology, and we actually need more intolerance (e.g., limitations on free speech)?
  • Because social media is not respected by the masses as the enormous medium of control that it wound up being in actuality?

What’s the next big realization here for mankind?

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Formfiller@lemmy.world 24 points 2 days ago (2 children)

The pedofile class doesn’t want democracy

[–] BeardededSquidward@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

As far as I'm concerned, everyone who is a billionaire has to prove they had nothing to do with Epstein or pedophilia in general.

[–] Formfiller@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago (8 children)

I feel like that’s reasonable but billionaires should automatically be abolished also

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] areakode@riskeratspizza.com 28 points 3 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (7 children)

They're going to let him tear the country apart, and then 25th amendment his ass just after January 20th 2027. That lets Little Smokey take over, and he's still eligible for 2 full terms. Mark my words...

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] SnarkoPolo@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago (3 children)

No one will grow a ball and stop him, so it's already too late. If you're an American, your life will never be the same.

[–] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)

It's not a single person issue. The entire system is broken. Taking out one leader is not going to fix anything.

[–] whoisearth@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

But will it make things better? Worse?

[–] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 5 points 2 days ago

Who knows? On one hand Trump's dementia means he's acting erratically. On the other it means that it's harder for the Nazis to follow whatever plan they have for the US. The next leader may stabilize things but the fall of democracy may be even faster.

[–] Sektor@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Only thing that can stop him is his incompetence.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] quick_snail@feddit.nl 11 points 3 days ago
[–] Ilixtze@lemmy.ml 10 points 3 days ago

It went from being four weapon manufacturing companies pretending to be a democracy to four weapon manufacturing companies pretending to be a dictatorship.

[–] quick_snail@feddit.nl 9 points 3 days ago
load more comments
view more: next ›