this post was submitted on 19 Aug 2025
190 points (92.8% liked)

politics

25292 readers
3019 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The poll indicates support for the more aggressive position Newsom has taken in standing up to Donald Trump, particularly over a plan by Republicans in Texas to redraw their state's congressional seat map in the hopes of winning more seats in midterm elections next year.

The battle to become the 2028 presidential election candidate will likely set the new direction for the Democratic Party as it struggles with net favorability at what one recent poll showed to be a three-year low. Newsom has not formally announced his candidacy.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 1 points 16 minutes ago

It's unsurprising Newsom is leading, given all the media coverage he's been given.

Anyway, any poll result now for 2028 is meaningless. A lot's going to happen between now and then, and non-centrist candidates will probably emerge, and possibly do well.

[–] MourningDove@lemmy.zip 4 points 2 hours ago

After reading through the comments here, I’m no longer curious as to how we arrived at where we currently are. We’re an absolute mess! An embarrassingly arrogant and equally ignorant mess.

And while it’s true that our future remains uncertain, after reading through this thread, I’m not sure it’s a good idea that any of us hold on to any length of hope that this disaster will ever right itself again. That is, if it is to be believed that we are a microcosm of a larger collective.

It’s said, that hope is a luxury of those who have a choice. But we had a choice. And what did we do? We slept. We withheld votes in protest. We stayed home. We opted out. However it is presented- We made our choice.

And now here we are. Salivating at the chance to tear one another a new asshole while we marinade in the results of our inability to do the bare minimum to protect a nation’s democracy.

We didn’t just deserve this:

We earned it.

[–] MoreFPSmorebetter@lemmy.zip 23 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

If this is the basket the Democrats put their eggs into I sense 8 years of the couch fucker in our futures. Newsome fucking sucks. At best he panders to progressives with one hand while he signs yet another shady bullshit deal behind closed doors like every single other politician alive with his other.

You think it's just a coincidence that all the money they raised with that benefit concert happened to go into non-profits that his wife runs? You think its been an accident that those effected by the fires haven't seen a penny from that concert?

California has some of the most corrupt and inept leadership it has ever had. More money than ever is being spent on things like homelessness and public transit projects, but strangely both the public transit and homeless problem have only been getting worse.

Fuck Gavin Newsome.

[–] BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago

Newsom is, and always has been, a slimy neoliberal greaseball. Not only does he not pander to progressives, he is the pinnacle of Democratic Party leftward obstructionism. Newsom serves nobody but Newsom. His current act is nothing more than the latest strategy to bolster his Presidential prospects after openly pandering to the far right failed to gain him any ground.

[–] goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org 5 points 5 hours ago

Idk how he would pander to progressives after mostly vetoing progressive laws in California then going on an anti trans kick once Trump won

[–] kerrigan778@lemmy.blahaj.zone 22 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

The DNC will die before it learns a lesson.

[–] Draedron@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 26 minutes ago

Voters will die before they learn the lesson. Beating fascism is more important than getting a candidate who agrees with everything you want.

[–] IdontplaytheTrombone@lemmy.world 11 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

There's no way he would win an election.

[–] dhork@lemmy.world 6 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Why not? He has a key advantage over Hillary and Kamala: he has a penis.

[–] Zer0_F0x@lemmy.world 7 points 8 hours ago

He's also a multimillionaire married to a billionaire, which helps. Him, not the voters, but it helps.

[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 12 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Great. He's gonna Hilary-up the election again.

[–] ChetManly@lemmy.world 6 points 8 hours ago

Don't forget to pokey-mon-go to the polls.

[–] Not_mikey@lemmy.dbzer0.com 42 points 12 hours ago (4 children)

Yeah, let's put up another California democrat that's too centrist to attract progressives and too California to attract middle America, it worked so well last time...

[–] Draedron@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 25 minutes ago

If progressives dont vote against fascism they arent progressive

[–] goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org 5 points 5 hours ago

It only makes sense to those who only think hilldog and Harris lost because they were women not because they ran God awful campaigns

[–] Taldan@lemmy.world 11 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

A month ago, I would have said the same thing. Right now though, he's the only candidate I see standing up to Trump

I don't particularly like his policies, but I want someone either very progressive, or willing to get dirty

The current regime is far too fascist for me to worry about whether someone is progressive enough

[–] zbyte64@awful.systems 10 points 12 hours ago

It's almost as if the people who find Republican issues compelling would rather vote for a full Republican than a Republican-lite. Maybe if he curses while doubling down on Zionism he will somehow reach the 3rd rail 🙄

[–] goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

But why?? Because he's acting like trump??

[–] baronvonj@lemmy.world 6 points 3 hours ago

No, because he's mocking Trump. And because he's fighting back in the dirt with redistricting.

[–] MourningDove@lemmy.zip 3 points 2 hours ago (1 children)
[–] goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

He's standing up to trump by just going mask off and acting like him

[–] obrien_must_suffer@lemmy.world 46 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

They're going to do Hillary 3.0 in 2028 aren't they.

[–] zbyte64@awful.systems 12 points 11 hours ago

It's his turn

[–] Dogiedog64@lemmy.world 11 points 12 hours ago

You better believe it!

[–] Boddhisatva@lemmy.world 51 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Sure, let's elect a Reagan republican dressed up as a democrat who will spend his whole term trying to reach across the aisle.

California Gov. Gavin Newsom torched his own political party and said Democrats have to speak to Republicans — and reject cancel culture — if they want to win.

Screw that. I enjoy watching Newsom bicker with Trump just like I enjoy when the Lincoln Project mocks Trump. But the next democratic candidate needs to be an actual progressive that supports workers and the disadvantaged in our nation.

[–] SmoothLiquidation@lemmy.world 20 points 13 hours ago (12 children)

I am very willing to debate this leading up to and during the primaries, but once those are done I am going to vote against the GOP no matter who is on the ballot.

[–] Laurentide@pawb.social 3 points 1 hour ago

I am going to vote against fascism. If the Democratic party insists on choosing a candidate who agrees with Republican efforts to genocide me, then I am going to vote against their fascist too. And don't come looking for me to whine about it after; by the time the Niemoller poem gets to you I'll be long gone already.

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] MagicShel@lemmy.zip 54 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

My fear is that the politics-as-sport metaphor has become too literal. He's getting attention by hitting at Trump and more Democrats should be doing that, but his actual policies and stances are uninspiring and offensive. He's another pro-corporate, pro-wealth, pro-status-quo white guy whose best quality is he isn't Trump.

[–] Atropos@lemmy.world 23 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

Completely agree. I long for the day I can finally for FOR something rather than AGAINST something.

On the other hand, not-trump is a pretty damn good quality.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] mathemachristian@lemmy.blahaj.zone 14 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

Pretty sad to see all these bluemagas already prepared to lose and suck it up and vote for gruesome newsom. Why would the dems give you anything if you're prepared to do whatever they ask of you anyway??? Hey boss I would like a salary increase but dont worry if you cant I'm gonna work here forever no matter what...

[–] dhork@lemmy.world 3 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Let's see if we get a competitive primary. We really haven't had one of those since 2008. If Newsom can win over genuine challengers in a primary, then maybe he can pull off a win in the general.

Who gives a shit if he can win? Arguably its even worse if the dems get to run a candidate like that and still get votes.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] circuitfarmer@lemmy.world 11 points 12 hours ago

Newsom is a corpo's idea of a progressive candidate. That is, he's not a progressive candidate.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 97 points 18 hours ago (23 children)

He's not actually doing anything, and less than six months ago he was sucking up to Alex Jones and Charlie Kirk and telling them he agrees with them and the Dems need to move to the right on "social issues" like the existence of LGBT and racism.

Newsom is who the billionaires want, he'd be the worst possible pick for anyone else.

[–] Marthirial@lemmy.world -1 points 2 hours ago

So who instead? Bernie? Jesus. You people don't want anything.

[–] wheezy@lemmy.ml 2 points 8 hours ago

Thank God this is the top comment here. I keep seeing these posts about him and I'm just worried all the liberals are falling for his bullshit pandering.

load more comments (21 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›