this post was submitted on 13 Aug 2025
13 points (100.0% liked)

politics

31129 readers
2674 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
all 27 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Deflated0ne@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Good. Neuter the fascists.

[–] heyWhatsay@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 year ago

The only way to fight unconstitutional behavior, is with the same unconstitutional behavior.

[–] PattyMcB@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Please please PLEASE let this work!

[–] wheezy@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You can quote me on this. Not only will this not work. They won't even actually implement anything to a degree that would even be able to make a difference.

Source: Democrats saying things and not following through for my entire lifetime.

[–] sploder@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

And the fact that he was literally mocking Trump with this message. The whole thing was essentially satire, written in Trump fashion.

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Let's say, for the sake of argument, California eliminates all Republican seats and Texas eliminates all Democratic seats... what would the new House look like?

Texas -12D, +12R out of 38 total. (+1 vacancy)

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_United_States_representatives_from_Texas

California -9R, +9D out of 52 total.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_United_States_representatives_from_California

Net change? -3D, +3R.

House composition goes from 219R / 212D / 4 Vacant to 222R / 209D / 4 Vacant.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_House_of_Representatives

Newsom - Nice try, but no.

Edit TIL - there are fewer Republican reps in California than there are Democratic reps in Texas!

[–] Stovetop@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Other blue states are threatening to follow California's lead, though, New York being one of them. If New York alone follows suit, that'd be an additional -7R, +7D. But even without New York, similar threats from Illinois and Maryland would also tip the scales (-4R, +4D combined)

[–] SaltySalamander@fedia.io -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

We may not like it, but the fact is, there are more red states than blue states. This is a competition that Blue states won't win.

[–] Serinus@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

The red states are much more gerrymandered than the blue states. They have less room.

[–] MBech@feddit.dk 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So... When are we going to stop pretending america is a democracy?

[–] MajinBlayze@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Probably not before an obviously sham election happens or not being a registered Republican is functionally outlawed

[–] SaltySalamander@fedia.io 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Registered Republican here. I've voted blue pretty much across the board since 2002, though.

[–] TemplaerDude@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Once you start tearing up democratically elected seats, and I’m not saying don’t because fuck fascists, but once you do you gotta think that republic is on flimsy ground.

[–] null_dot@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 year ago

You're democracy is long since dead and burned, friend.

[–] Steve@startrek.website 1 points 1 year ago

This is where we’re at

[–] nickwitha_k@lemmy.sdf.org 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The House is supposed to provide proportional representation, per the US Constitution. It has not since the early 20th century. Instead, it gives significant increased representation to people in lower population states.

[–] cy888@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Madison's Grand Compromise was to give EXTRA representation to low population states (2 senators regardless of a States population), not proportional representation.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Dude was talking about the House, and the Reapportionment Act of 1929

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reapportionment_Act_of_1929

[–] Alexstarfire@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

This is stupid. Removing the voice of people is wrong no matter who does it. Fuck Newsom and Abbott.

We need a new way to elect our representatives. The current method has clearly failed.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Removing the voice of people is wrong

That's single-candidate districts for you. Put 40 Dems and 40 Republicans and 20 Swing Voters into a district and you're going to have a bare minimum of 40 unhappy voices.

There are alternative methods for choosing elected representation. But they don't play well with a country as committed to segregation, disenfranchisement, and power consolidation as the modern Americanized democratic system.

[–] ok_computer_dude@lemmy.zip 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So they just rollover and do nothing the? I don’t love it, but at some point we need to stop sitting around hoping we will play nice or do the right thing.

[–] Alexstarfire@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Anything other than changing how we select representatives is a shit sandwich. One choice just has less shit.

[–] Zexks@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Anything such as what SPECIFICALLY.

[–] Alexstarfire@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago

What I said in my first post?