this post was submitted on 22 Mar 2026
703 points (99.7% liked)

Technology

82886 readers
3089 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] richardwallass@sh.itjust.works 8 points 56 minutes ago

Good boys !

[–] Suavevillain@lemmy.world 1 points 1 minute ago

Good. Put that energy into a moderate parental control education fund or something. The ID gating the net is only for control.

[–] cyberpunk007@lemmy.ca 17 points 2 hours ago

It's about time I flash that onto my pixel 6 pro.

[–] voluble@lemmy.ca 82 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

"If GrapheneOS devices can't be sold in a region due to their regulations, so be it."

Wonder if Motorola feels the same way.

[–] Flipper@feddit.org 47 points 3 hours ago (5 children)

They can just sell their normal phone. As long as the user is able to run the installer it doesn't really matter.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] bonn2@lemmy.zip 108 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (11 children)

I was wondering when I would see this headline. I wonder if any other big names do similar

[–] TheLastOfHisName@piefed.social 17 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

Linux Distros (so far) Refusing Age Verification

EDIT
I recommend going to Ageless Linux's site and reading up on their take on the whole issue. They clearly illustrate how poorly thought out the California law is.

[–] kabe@lemmy.world 46 points 4 hours ago (3 children)

I also wonder whether or not grapheneos, or open source Linux OSs in general, will face any repercussions for failing to comply to these regulations due to the relatively low user count.

[–] wewbull@feddit.uk 48 points 3 hours ago (32 children)

Hate to say it but systemd, the init system of most Linux distros, already has PRs with maintainer backing to implement DoB recording.

Some people can't kneel fast enough.

[–] yardratianSoma@lemmy.ca 2 points 26 minutes ago

DoB recording, and ID age verification, are two different things though.

[–] portnull@lemmy.dbzer0.com 20 points 2 hours ago (2 children)
[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 18 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

The self-important creator of Systemd has personally blocked that PR, if I'm hearing correctly, which would suggest he or his employer Microsoft is all in on it.

[–] 4am@lemmy.zip 5 points 39 minutes ago

He left MS in January

[–] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 14 points 2 hours ago

That has already been closed

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 9 points 2 hours ago

Maybe this'll take the shine off that wunderkinder mess and people will finally be free to choose something more reliable. I love how RH pushed this beta software so hard and my reboots are now just shite -- unreliable and occasionally ridiculously delayed.

I'll be glad to see the back of that metastatic shitball.

load more comments (29 replies)
[–] sphericalcube@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 3 hours ago

I imagine people behind this law are pretty interested in this small but powerful user base. I would just boldly assume that a lot of people responsible for independent software and privacy advocates are using Linux etc. So its a interesting user base for sure. But regulating open source software luckily is pretty much impossible and they wont give up their(our) privacy without a fight. Also, we will see how much the user base will grow when these regulations get tighter.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
[–] Endymion_Mallorn@kbin.melroy.org 42 points 4 hours ago (16 children)

Now if only GrapheneOS was easy to install on cheap Android devices.

[–] kylian0087@lemmy.dbzer0.com 25 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Grapheneos is surprisingly the most easy OS to install... The issue is most phone manufacturer's dont meet Grapheneos its standards.

[–] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 1 points 24 minutes ago

I agree, but isn't that just the same way said differently?

it's not hard to install if you have a phone that follows stringent standards, that only 30% of manufacturers follow...

[–] just2look@lemmy.zip 39 points 4 hours ago (3 children)

They have reached a deal with Motorola, so hopefully there will be more options soon. You can get we used pixels pretty cheap though, and the installation process is very easy.

[–] CMDR_Horn@lemmy.world 19 points 4 hours ago (5 children)

I was wondering how this stance will impact that deal. A large company like Motorola would typically seek to comply with laws such as these

[–] just2look@lemmy.zip 17 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

I'm hoping they already had the discussion with Motorola about it. I'm assuming Motorola wouldn't be on the hook legally since Graphene is the OS provider. I could be wrong though.

[–] CorrectAlias@piefed.blahaj.zone 11 points 3 hours ago

Yeah, hopefully worst case, Motorola just doesn't ship them with Graphene (which could be a security risk anyway). Then they'd be off the hook.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (14 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›