Slop pusher really wants everyone to use the slop machine. More at 11.
this post was submitted on 23 Mar 2026
148 points (95.7% liked)
Fuck AI
6809 readers
3208 users here now
"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"
A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.
AI, in this case, refers to LLMs, GPT technology, and anything listed as "AI" meant to increase market valuations.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Spend half your salary on my ass! Or else!
They don't seem to be suggesting they use their own money. Just using their salary as a comparison. It'd be like if a trucking company related gas expenditures to employee salaries. If they had an employee that earned 80k but only spent $20 in gas, that would be odd. They seem to be suggesting that in order to prove their working efficiency, they should be spending a certain amount of company money on AI.
I don't agree with the assessment, but I do think it should be clear that they are not expecting that money to come out of employee salaries.
Reminds me of Elon's comment about programmers value being based on the number of lines of code they'd written.
who cares about readability, lets use if statements for everything to reach maximum value,
I think you are correct but using $$ as a metric makes zero sense... is AI less "effective" to engineer chips (as per Jensen) if gas prices raise and therefore the cost of cooling down the data centers?
I think this shitty attempt to line up tokens with salary is based on their absolutely stupid idea to start paying and trading with tokens as if they were real money
Should be clear? In this economy?!
This is an insane take. No paid internal engineer is blowing their own money on this kind of tooling. Nvidia pays for it.
The same expectations would not be true for employees for normal companies either, instead the goal would be to have 2 FTEs and 1FTE worth of token expenditure, instead of 4+ FTEs. Same cost, "more productivity" (at least that is the argument of the people making money from selling AI hardware.)
This is just self-serving messaging that he's hoping will impact the AI spend and policy of other CEOs.
Maybe he believes it, maybe he doesn't, but it's 100% in his interest to make other decision makers believe that he believes it.
If you're paying me $500k, I'll do whatever stupid bullshit you want me to do. Just keep the paychecks coming. I don't care if you totally fuck up your stupid company, by then I'll have a fat nest egg, and I'll just walk away without looking back at the explosions.
Edit: Wait! You mean they pay them $500K, and then they expect them to kick back half of it to do their jobs? Well, you can just fuck off with that.
If a company wants me to use a "tool" to do my job, they have to pay for it.
I can stab techbro shillionaires like Huang with a pencil and write a ransom note with said pencil and paper. Can't do that with AI slop "brokens" now can I?
So company trying to pay in company script again?
Can they still spend the other half of their salary at non company affiliated stores?
My company should be providing me the tools I need to get things done. If I’m making $500K, that means the company should be willing to pony up $250K in tokens, not me personally.
(Not to mention that I reject the entire premise)
I think Jensen is really onto something here.
Let’s destroy the world faster so humans (or whatever replaces us) can start rebuilding sooner.
It’s really a public service
Or perhaps we can just make the world a better place without needing to destroy it first? Kinda hard to make anything better when the entire world looks like Venus.
How about we just destroy these stupid corporations
As someone who pays $20/month for cursor for work and never go past my quotas to finish all my month's tasks, AND who has transitioned to almost not coding manually at all and mostly just reviewing generated code, what the FUCK are y'all doing that would ever eat anywhere even close to half your damn salary???? How can you trust any of the output at that kind of volume???
Man, it's gotten REALLY hard to gauge yourself as a developer nowadays. I have no idea if I'm falling behind or not, and I'm pretty sure more than half of y'all would already condemn me for going too far for using AI, while at least a few would laugh at how behind I am.
Regardless, fuck you Jensen. Fuck you and your crocodile leather jacket.
No no no no you fool. That's a classic blunder. He's indicating the ideal cost of using tokens and possibly foreshadowing where price increases are going.
To be honest, I'd trust the paper and pencil work much more.
Replace ALL CEOs with AI first
Oh I'm sure, at least in some small measure, this was exactly the mindset that pushed this shit into every facet of existence. Some rich fucks realized genAI could do their dumb ass jobs better than them for a fraction of the cost, so they spent the last few years doing all they can to show how genAI can actually do the jobs of service workers and creative types, better.
A few suggestions that would incentivise actual growth and improvement rather than market fraud and personal enrichment.
Cap CEO compensation to a reasonably "fair" multiple of their workforces average. Compensation type must match that average as well (cash/stock/scrip.) Bonuses follow the same rules.
Stock buybacks require the company to commit to both workforce and r&d budget increases of the same value before they can be done again.
Mass layoffs require issuance of new stock that match the % of the workforce cut.
Look just because the CEO needs to spend half his salary on AI tokens to exist doesn't mean the engineers do
Why on earth would anyone ask Jensen Huang about whether he thinks people should use AI?
CEO says use my product it is great.
Atop fucking posting what dioshit CEOs say. You are stupidier for reading it.
Luigi?
Stupid Jacket says Nvidia engineers should use AI tokens worth half their annual salary every year to be fully productive — compares not using slop to using paper and pencil for designing chips
Real Engineer: Huh. How much Cthonic Horror Porn does $250,000 in tokens buy me?
In other words, CEO compares not knowing how to work to being able to prove you ain't pulling shit out your ass. That's all I get from his pen and paper analogy.
If it's actually possible, and even expected, for one person to consumer $250k worth of LLM tokens in a year then that means only a small group of people could bankrupt OpenAI in short order.
He got paid $50 million last year, so should he be consuming $25 million in tokens?
Economic quotas. Yeah, does he have a 5 year plan already as well?