this post was submitted on 27 Mar 2026
114 points (99.1% liked)

politics

29096 readers
1865 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] minorkeys@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

The government exists because it does two things: decides the rules, enforces those rules through violence. It only does the former because it can do the latter. If it loses its monopoly on violence, it loses its ability to decide and enforce the rules and will cease to exist. Border security, such as the TSA, is a mechanism of that violence, as is the armed forces and the police. Private interests taking control of the mechanisms of state violence is a road to the death of the state and replacement with undemocratic corporate and private power systems. It reverts humanity from democracy to tyranny, which some argue is the natural state.

[–] YiddishMcSquidish@lemmy.today 24 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

NPR was promoting this yesterday!

On all things considered, they mentioned the long lines and waits, then immediately started praising one Texas airport that was privatized, and didn't have those waits.

The TSA is nothing more than security theater anyways, but we gotta find ways to funnel money into those pockets already flush with it I guess.

[–] empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Also consider private security forces don't have pesky things like "oversight" and "laws regulating fairness"

Thata why Flock and Palantir exist now

[–] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 9 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

Blackwater. But let's be real, the gov only has the illusion of oversight. In practice most war criminals never face legitimate consequences. The American military industrial complex is the largest terrorist org that has existed since WW2.

If you add in the fact that US intelligence has allowed child sex traffickers to exist for decades under the guise of "national security", the US gov is the largest criminal enterprise on Earth, period.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 11 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah, they didn't have waits because the private company is paying their workers, so they show up to do the job. TSA isn't getting paid, so 40+% aren't showing up.

[–] n4ch1sm0@piefed.social 11 points 4 hours ago

That is the point exactly

e8KUiTXqaPvpk4v.jpg

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 8 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

Airport Security before 9/11 looked essentially the same, but they contracted with private security companies. That led to 9/11, so the government took it over and created TSA, and we have t had any hijackings. Now MAGA wants to go back to the system that allowed 9/11, mostly because TSA workers don't kiss their asses.

Like getting rid of the Clean Air & Water Act, because we already have clean air and water.

[–] Zak@lemmy.world 9 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

The TSA has little to do with the lack of hijacking since 2001. Secured cockpit doors and the widespread belief that hijacking means death are the main reasons it no longer occurs.

[–] cmbabul@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) (1 children)

Yeah the understanding at the time was that if your plane gets hijacked don’t do shit and eventually things will be fine. Post 9/11 someone trying to take over a plane is getting bum rushed. 9/11 could really only happen the one time

Edit: I’m sorry if a plane hits a building in the next two weeks

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 3 points 1 hour ago (2 children)

Suicidal hijackers are NOT worried about death, but they are worried about their plot being fooled. Airport security is tighter than it used to be, so they don't want to risk their operation being stopped before they even get on the plane.

Better to come up with a different plan, with less risk of discovery. There are plenty of crowded places to bomb or shoot up.

[–] Hawke@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

There are plenty of crowded places to bomb or shoot up.

Like say airport security lines?

[–] cmbabul@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

Yep, the simplest crime is the most likely. That’s just people

[–] tidderuuf@lemmy.world 3 points 3 hours ago

By your same logic we haven't had a 9/11 style attack before 9/11 for how many decades? And how many attempts have there been and how many have successfully took weapons on to airliners through TSA since 9/11? The statistics and numbers are very much against the TSA. It's a useless for show waste of tax dollars when reinforced automated locking doors on aircraft have proven to be a better deterrent at preventing 9/11.

[–] Innerworld@lemmy.world 2 points 6 hours ago
[–] altphoto@lemmy.today 1 points 5 hours ago

Random mammography exams for free!