this post was submitted on 30 Mar 2026
1034 points (92.5% liked)

Political Memes

11943 readers
2183 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

1) Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

2) No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

3) Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

4) No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

5) No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 8) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] thespcicifcocean@lemmy.world -1 points 2 months ago (16 children)

So are you for giving more flexibility for people who don't necessarily need it, or for taking away flexibility from people who do?

load more comments (16 replies)
[–] Entertainmeonly@lemmy.blahaj.zone -1 points 2 months ago

I made up a whole family back in the early aughts. Honestly i did get my time off every single time with near no explanation.

The process of keeping up the facade was just more work then fighting with hr for my pto.

[–] untorquer@quokk.au -1 points 2 months ago

A possible option working within existing systems would be:

Parental leave: you get pop sustain rate (2.1?) parental leaves banked. You use 1 leave for every child you have and bank is allowed negative with no penalty. At 45 or so you get to use your bank without being a parent.

Something like 95% of people become parents.

Flex time/time-bank + home/hybrid office fix most other issues in office jobs.

[–] takeda@lemmy.dbzer0.com -2 points 2 months ago

Whomever wrote that never had children.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›