this post was submitted on 31 Mar 2026
218 points (99.1% liked)

politics

29498 readers
5157 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] dhork@lemmy.world 113 points 3 weeks ago (5 children)

The actual details are bonkers

According to the Daily Caller, the executive order would require the secretary of the Department of Homeland Security to compile a list of verified U.S. citizens in each state who are eligible to vote. DHS would undertake the effort with the Social Security Administration, the Daily Caller wrote, citing a White House fact sheet.

The U.S. Postal Service would then be required under the order to only send mail-in ballots to voters who appear on the list, according to the Daily Caller. Election authorities in each state typically send out mail ballots to voters, not the Postal Service.

Aside from being blatantly illegal, I bet if you dig into this you will find that the contracts have been given to all of Musk's friends, using all the SSA data they stole

[–] Asafum@lemmy.world 29 points 3 weeks ago

Oops a "technical glitch" accidentally removed all Democrats. Can't redo the election though, sorry. We'll do better Next Time™©®

[–] bluemellophone@lemmy.world 18 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

“Get absolutely fucked”

-the good people of Oregon

[–] zd9@lemmy.world 9 points 3 weeks ago

100% this is all Musk/Russia

[–] I_Jedi@lemmy.today 8 points 3 weeks ago

Though highly contested, a Supreme Court ruling sidesteps the electoral process, disqualifying popular presidential candidates from several states.

-Shattered Union intro

[–] CultLeader4Hire@lemmy.world 5 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Isn’t USPS set to collapse very soon? I was surprised when I got a flyer in the mail they were hiring. I live in a state that ONLY does mail in voting too so I’m double confused/worried about this

[–] Brkdncr@lemmy.world 6 points 3 weeks ago

My local usps has had a broken front window for about 6 months. It’s covered with plywood with no signs of planned repair.

The building was broken into about 2 months ago and a number of PO Boxes were severely damaged.

They want to kill off everything except police enforcement.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 88 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

Bitch, YOU just voted by mail!

[–] riskable@programming.dev 32 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

To be fair, Trump voting at all is super sketchy.

[–] hperrin@lemmy.ca 29 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

He’s a felon, but they allow felons to vote in Florida.

[–] Red0ctober@lemmy.world 14 points 3 weeks ago

They do, after an onerous and capricious process that can end in an "I don't feel like giving you that right back".

[–] Lodespawn@aussie.zone 9 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

What? Felons should be allowed to vote, they are still citizens ..

[–] hperrin@lemmy.ca 10 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

I agree in every case except Donald Trump.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 23 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

And his excuse was because work was important. Which is exactly why everyone else wants this.

[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 4 points 3 weeks ago

Kinda makes you just want to beat the ever hating snott out of a fat overgrown adult oompa loompa, doesn't it?

Now for legal reasons, I'm NOT advocating for violence against the president.

Buuuuuut, hypothetically, just hypothetically, I imagine the fist to face ratio would deliver a very satisfying crunch on your knuckles, if you WERE to punch a 34x convicted felon. Hypothetically, you'd likely have an orange fist after the sun tan wipes off on your hand. Hypothetically, this unnamed 34x felon with bizarely orange suntan, would likely make a satisfying crumple onto the ground. But it's ok, because this unidentified unnamed hypothetical example is ALSO a pedophile, with pending sexual assault charges pending, involving minors. Hypothetically, this is a man who destroyed childrens innocence, took their childhood from them, and then was forced daily to see their abuser on tv facing no consequences. At times even bragging about their crimes. Hypothetically. So punching this hypothetical monster of a "human" would not only be justified, it would be a god damn patriotic thing to do, to confront someone who raped American children. So hypothetically, if you broke their nose while punching their face, I imagine you would instantly become a national hero and icon.

..........guys! I want to punch trump in his stupid face.

[–] resipsaloquitur@lemmy.world 4 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

I wish golf was my work.

Not really.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] TryingToBeGood@reddthat.com 9 points 3 weeks ago

And his wife, and his son, and probably his entire family…

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ShellMonkey@piefed.socdojo.com 74 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Trump has told Republicans that they will lose the November midterm elections if they don't pass the bill and crack down on mail-in voting.

You know, any normal person might take such confidence that they'll lose an election as a sign that maybe they're doing the wrong things.

[–] plz1@lemmy.world 31 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Nope, they take it as a sign of not doing enough wrong things.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Red0ctober@lemmy.world 52 points 3 weeks ago

How 'bout them states rights? And small government? Lol

[–] BC_viper@lemmy.world 42 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)
[–] zd9@lemmy.world 13 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Congratulations! Welcome to... The List

[–] BC_viper@lemmy.world 8 points 3 weeks ago

Well at least its not the epstein list.

[–] OwOarchist@pawb.social 4 points 3 weeks ago

If everybody is on the list, nobody is on the list.

[–] I_Jedi@lemmy.today 5 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

It's times like these I'm glad I'm not on Reddit anymore.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works 4 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Not until after the midterms

[–] Deceptichum@quokk.au 10 points 3 weeks ago

No, right this second. Every delay is another life lost.

[–] TryingToBeGood@reddthat.com 26 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Good thing the constitution leaves it the states to conduct elections, not the federal government.

[–] mech@feddit.org 32 points 3 weeks ago

Ah yes, the constitution has such a good track record stopping Trump.

[–] tidderuuf@lemmy.world 19 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

It's comforting in some ways to see Trump make these desperate moves. It really shows the pressure is taking a toll on him and Republicans know it too.

[–] I_Jedi@lemmy.today 9 points 3 weeks ago

His desperation makes me wonder if he'll do a big family annihilator thing before he's removed from power.

"I won the 2028 election! It was ME! But those Radical Left judges in the SCOTUS said I'm ineligible! Therefore, I'm going to do what I was planning for my next term in only the next few months! Every living thing in Iran will be DEAD before the week is out! Same with the Radical Left cities like Chicago and Los Angeles! No survivors, no prisoners! Thank you for your attention to this matter!"

[–] iamthetot@piefed.ca 4 points 3 weeks ago

desperate moves

These aren't "desperate moves." These are just... the moves. Like, this was the plan. This was always the plan. It's not out of desperation, it's out of design.

[–] Zedstrian@sopuli.xyz 15 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

AMP links are bad for privacy and web decentralization; here's the non-AMP version.

I recommend using an extension to automatically redirect AMP URLs to their non-AMP counterparts.

[–] SirMaple__@lemmy.ca 12 points 3 weeks ago
[–] warbosstodd@piefed.social 11 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Yeah. That’s not how Executive Orders work.

[–] douglasg14b@lemmy.world 4 points 3 weeks ago

Hasn't stopped agencies from enforcing or following them, states from following them, or law enforcement from adhering to them.

He is given the power the other branches of the government and states give him, and they all give him everything.

Lots of the executive orders have no legal standing, where he has no authority over what they change. Yet here we are.

[–] meme_historian@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 3 weeks ago

The notion that any aspect of a presidential election can be regulated through executive orders by the current sitting president would be laughed out of the room in any halfway functional democracy.

Might as well do away with the charade and call them royal decrees

[–] Didntdoit71@feddit.online 9 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

An EO that's worth less, legally, than the paper it's written on. If the states fight it.

[–] Asafum@lemmy.world 4 points 3 weeks ago

Whoops delay delay delay delay, would you look at that it's already midterms! Can't go change it now!

-Courts

[–] Nusm@peachpie.theatl.social 8 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Struck down by a court in 5... 4... 3...

[–] grue@lemmy.world 7 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (2 children)

Mark my words: this will go to SCOTUS just slowly enough that they'll use it as an excuse to decide it after the election, or at least that it'll be "too close" to the election for the ruling to apply.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] CorrectAlias@piefed.blahaj.zone 6 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

The ballot drop boxes are not affected and can be used instead.

[–] PancakesCantKillMe@lemmy.world 10 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Sure, but also fuck this noise:

the executive order would require the secretary of the Department of Homeland Security to compile a list of verified U.S. citizens in each state who are eligible to vote.

And The Orange King just voted by mail himself.

[–] SolarMonkey@slrpnk.net 5 points 3 weeks ago

Makes a person wonder what they really intend to do with that list…

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] patruelis@lemmy.world 5 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

Can someone explain to me what this means for USA? (I'm not from USA and am not familiar with the system) To me, USA has a guide-only vote because the actual vote it's not by the people but by Electoral College which means the people don't actually vote. They vote for someone hoping that the elector will vote like them in turn, it's a trust me bro kind of situation.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] NekoKoneko@lemmy.world 4 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Well, I suppose we should be grateful this is happening early enough for a court challenge to play out instead of a last minute EO that will just make be followed automatically by red and purple (with red governors/AGs) states.

But no doubt the timing is because there are twelve additional fascist election moves in Trump/Miller's playbook, any of which can subvert the election, and they're just giving themselves time to run down the list.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›