this post was submitted on 21 Apr 2026
113 points (97.5% liked)

politics

29509 readers
5694 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Happy TACO Tuesday everyone!

top 24 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] humanspiral@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 day ago

Iran isn't really fractured. That SoH is declared open (but with Iran control) when ceasefire agreement sets, then closed shortly after when Zio side does not implement their obligations is not fracture. Ghalibaf, if he's main negotiator, is not publicly different from IRGC view, and Trump's announcements that a deal for complete surrender by Iran was already agreed is simply pure BS made to profit from financial market volatility.

Still, Iran's negotiations are far too passive. Needs to negotiate with world on opening SoH, and World negotiate with US on leaving, so that SoH can reopen. That is only eventual outcome US can afford, but world just waiting passively for US to just leave before dealing with Iran is a longer delay on SoH full flow, as well as longer delay to force US to leave. Iran should also make constructive posts on nuclear issue. Specifically reparations for existing stockpile, and long term contract for Uranium enrichment services that make it more valuable to export than use. US side is completely incapable of negotiating quickly any other option other than cash for uranium, or complete clone of JCPOA.

Still, by asking Iran to repeat their 10 point plan as basis for negotiation, it is the beginning of US surrender process. It's just moving far too slow for global health.

[–] homes@piefed.world 41 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Uhhh… does Iran agree to the ceasefire? Does Trump know that a ceasefire has to be agreed on by both sides? He can’t just “declare“ a ceasefire unless Iran agrees to it, too.

[–] empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com 20 points 2 days ago (1 children)

He can’t just “declare“ a ceasefire unless Iran agrees to it, too.

I mean, he can. It's called surrender.

Also Israel won't give a shit anyway so his word doesn't mean anything.

[–] homes@piefed.world 11 points 2 days ago

I mean, he can. It's called surrender.

Lmao

[–] No_Eponym@lemmy.ca 9 points 2 days ago

"I declare ~~bankruptcy~~ ceasefire!" - Donald J. Trump

[–] CheeseNoodle@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago

Also iirc Israel just kept shooting? And then Trump got mad than iran continued shooting back because it 'violated' the imaginary ceasefire that apprently involved them just sitting there and being shot without retaliating?

[–] IAmYouButYouDontKnowYet@reddthat.com 30 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (4 children)

Dude shut the fuck up already. Everyone hates you fully and completely to the highest extent possible.

Edit: not talking about op.

[–] Corngood@lemmy.ml 25 points 2 days ago

Edit: not talking about op.

I laughed thinking of you lashing out epically at OP just for posting a news story.

[–] Heikki2@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

Ditto. He talks like someone who looses braincells every time he goes to the bathroom.

That being said where are the mostly unredacted aside from the ongoing investigations and victims, Epstien Files. I still want to know who was on there and why there were redactions. I especially want to hear the excuse why the word dont was redacted

[–] n4ch1sm0@piefed.social 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I don't get why news outlets take Trump's announcements and make them headlines as if were the sole truth of the state of affairs when it's been repeatedly proven to be complete bullshit. Framing it in a way that they're claims is one thing, but leave it up to news outlets to be this fucking dishonest too.

[–] devolution@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago
[–] REDACTED@infosec.pub 2 points 2 days ago

You finally get enough courage to ask your crush out. After arriving at a restaurant and getting a table, some time later you need to go to a toilet. The phone stays sitting on a table because just before you were showing her pictures of your cat. As you leave, the phone suddenly gets a notification of your comment and she sees it

[–] cmbabul@slrpnk.net 10 points 2 days ago

He’s literally just manipulating the market

[–] SeeMarkFly@lemmy.ml 14 points 2 days ago (1 children)

How much money did he make off wall street this "changed my mind"?

[–] Steve@startrek.website 14 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Less and less every time. He needs a new play already. I suggest attacking Israel if you really want to destabilize markets.

[–] SeeMarkFly@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 days ago

THAT'S why he wanted the nuke codes!

[–] Big_Boss_77@fedinsfw.app 13 points 2 days ago

Damn, is it taco Tuesday already?

[–] devolution@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago

TACO Tuesday.

[–] limonfiesta@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

This isn't a TACO.

It's an attempt to assert control over Iran by unilaterally extending the ceasefire.

Frankly, this is one of the reasons why the IRGC did not want this ceasefire in the first place, as it removed a large part of their leverage and gave up the initiative.

Trump isn't wrong about the Iranian government being fractured.

Will be interesting to see if the Iranians use Israel's ceasefire violations or the blockade as justification for resuming missle and drone attacks.

[–] flandish@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

it’s not an attempt to assert control, it’s an “out” to manufacture consent at Gulf of Tonkin levels.

[–] homes@piefed.world 12 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Seriously. Iran could, five minutes from now, just announced that Trump can go fuck himself and that they don’t agree to the ceasefire at all and start shooting at ships. Trump thinks that gives him leverage. Because he’s an idiot.

[–] flandish@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

that’s trump’s plan. iran shoots and now trump has “proof” we “need” to be there boots on ground and queue up the new hit “murica” country songs..

Yeah Trump is a bully running out of tricks

[–] kmartburrito@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago