this post was submitted on 17 Apr 2026
247 points (100.0% liked)

politics

29498 readers
5157 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Their backgrounds stand out. And not in a good way.

Two bankruptcies and six law enforcement jobs in three years. An allegation of lying in a police report to justify a felony charge against an innocent woman — an incident that led to a $75,000 settlement and criticism of his integrity. A third job candidate once failed to graduate from a police academy, then lasted only three weeks in his only job as a police officer.

Their common bond: All were hired recently by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement during an unprecedented hiring spree — 12,000 new officers and special agents to double its force — after the agency received a $75 billion windfall from Congress to enact Donald Trump’s mass deportation campaign.

top 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 35 points 6 days ago (4 children)

~~Two bankruptcies~~ and six law enforcement jobs in three years.

The bankruptcy garbage in hiring practices and judgement of character needs to stop (I've never filed bankruptcy). Otherwise, carry on.

Eta: yes yes "susceptible to bribes,” because people financially comfortable like say, Clarence Thomas, aren't.

[–] billwashere@lemmy.world 15 points 6 days ago

The bankruptcy thing in the LEO world has to do with getting into situations where they could easily be compromised, not punishing them for bad financial decisions. The idea being it’s easier to bribe and control you. I’m not arguing for or against just that’s the reasoning.

Not that it matters. Notice ICE isn’t deporting wealthy immigrants just the poors. Same way with regular cops. I live where people often have $100k cars and you never see one of them pulled over. I’ve been cut off by more than one Beamer driving recklessly on the way into work and it’s never them.

[–] Jhex@lemmy.world 8 points 6 days ago (1 children)
[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 4 points 6 days ago (1 children)

For normal jobs, sure. For law enforcement, the military, the intelligence sector, and possibly even Congress, NO. That is potentially inviting a spy into your organization, as a competing faction can pay their debts for leverage over them.

[–] Jhex@lemmy.world 6 points 6 days ago (1 children)

NO. That is potentially inviting a spy into your organization, as a competing faction can pay their debts for leverage over them.

How is that different from any other form of legal bribery that already exists in the USA?

It is 100% legal to use money as speech in the USA and to provide "gifts" to anyone, including Supreme Court Justices, if you so feel like it

[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 5 points 6 days ago

It isn't bribery. It's blackmail.

Though I do agree the bribery should be outlawed.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

Eh, depends on the job. I feel like it takes a certain type of person to have more than one bankruptcy. That's not normal, and absolutely is a red flag for positions that have responsibilities.

It's not clear if they mean that the two bankruptcies occurred over three years, but if so, that's pretty fucking bad. Almost impressive, really.

[–] Jhex@lemmy.world 8 points 6 days ago

well, your president has 6 and apparently he is competing for the job of Jesus...

[–] stoly@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago

It's not even the bribes. These people can be in situations where they have control over other peoples' property. Bankruptcy is very often due to bad luck like a layoff of medical condition, but is also widely caused by a lack of financial maturity. I agree that bad credit should not disqualify most people from most jobs, but then again, do you really want someone working at a bank that is shit with their own money? Some positions need a higher level of scrutiny.

[–] artyom@piefed.social 25 points 6 days ago

Yeah no shit, you don't hire that many people in such a short time and expect to get the cream of the crop.

[–] TryingToBeGood@reddthat.com 18 points 6 days ago

Well, Noem (?) said they were going to be raising the age limit, loosening background requirements and reducing training time for these yokels, so….yeah

[–] thesohoriots@lemmy.world 6 points 6 days ago

Get Bigballs back and tell him to hire like it’s the Danbury Trashers.

[–] thehowlingnorth@lemmy.ca 2 points 6 days ago

"How many Y chromosomes do you have? We prefer 2, but we'll take 1."