this post was submitted on 24 Apr 2026
220 points (98.7% liked)

Technology

84043 readers
8960 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] rob_t_firefly@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago (2 children)

What stops a human running Tinder bot profiles from scanning their eyeball, getting the badge, and continuing on their merry way of running the bot?

[–] BygoneNeutrino@lemmy.world 2 points 51 minutes ago* (last edited 51 minutes ago)

If you can limit things to one bot per person, it will solve the problem. One bot per person is equivalent to traditional cat fishing.

[–] GenosseFlosse@feddit.org 1 points 56 minutes ago* (last edited 56 minutes ago) (1 children)

I guess the have to be somewhat unique like a face.

[–] village604@adultswim.fan 2 points 43 minutes ago (1 children)

Your iris is as unique as a fingerprint.

[–] RIotingPacifist@lemmy.world 1 points 15 minutes ago

It's it easy to generate fake fingerprints though?

[–] sturmblast@lemmy.world 9 points 3 hours ago

This stuff is gonna fail hard

[–] Tetsuo@jlai.lu 24 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (2 children)

The Match Group-owned platform is partnering with World, the identity verification project by OpenAI CEO Sam Altman, to introduce a system that uses iris scans to confirm a person is human.

🤮

[–] Danitos@reddthat.com 1 points 1 hour ago

They give you the poison to sell you the cure.

[–] atrielienz@lemmy.world 8 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

You want some fuk? Give us you biometric data!

[–] ptu@sopuli.xyz 3 points 2 hours ago
[–] thedeadwalking4242@lemmy.world 18 points 4 hours ago

What if I train a generative AI on thousands of images of iris's and start generating fake ones?

[–] Dogiedog64@lemmy.world 5 points 3 hours ago

No thanks, I'm out

[–] SlippiHUD@slrpnk.net 18 points 5 hours ago (4 children)

Why are they so insistant of iris scans? What are they getting out of it?

[–] GenosseFlosse@feddit.org 1 points 53 minutes ago

Could be unique like a fingerprint. Might be able to crosscheck this with other biometric data, like when a picture is taken at airports or border crossings.

[–] leoj@piefed.zip 9 points 2 hours ago

make the AIs better by scanning thousands of human eyes lol

[–] mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 hours ago

Because it's "futuristic" and fascists are obsessed with that image

[–] Siegfried@lemmy.world 16 points 5 hours ago

Data to sell

[–] Bloefz@lemmy.world 4 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Is this legal in Europe? I doubt that will fly here.

I've not used tinder anyway, I'm more the feeld kinda person but I bet this kind of thing will spread if it's successful.

[–] DacoTaco@lemmy.world 1 points 10 minutes ago

Why not? What is the difference between that and other proof of authenticity through pictures?

[–] Hadriscus@jlai.lu 20 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (1 children)
[–] Bahnd@lemmy.world 9 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

Also in Minority Report, they do the whole eye scanning thing.

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 4 points 3 hours ago

Next in AI: realistic eyes!

[–] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 13 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

So what's the dating scene like for bots anyway? What do they do on a first date? Do they show eachother their prompt?

[–] GenosseFlosse@feddit.org 1 points 50 minutes ago

They are scammers who try to manipulate you into buying worthless crypto, or blackmail you after you send "your girlfriend" intimate pictures or videos.

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 4 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

Not a fucking chance.

[–] musket528@sopuli.xyz 3 points 4 hours ago

tinder is 0% of humanity by definition💀

[–] D1re_W0lf@piefed.social 55 points 8 hours ago

“Let’s partner with a bot maker to prevents bots. This is not about collecting and selling user data. No, not at all” 🙄😑

[–] Zwuzelmaus@feddit.org 25 points 10 hours ago

AI is not doing this all on it's own.

Where there are fake profiles, there are also real human scammers owning them. And they won't have no problem at all with buying enough real human data from somewhere.

So if tinder wanted to do such a thing for serious, they wouldn't choose such a stupid , short-sighted action.

[–] EvergreenGuru@lemmy.world 80 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

All they had to do was improve their facial recognition to scan all photos. Scammers would use fake photos and put their real photo (ai edited slightly) as the their last photo. This allowed them to get verified, but still scam. They don’t need more biometrics. Other apps are doing fine without your iris scans.

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 44 points 10 hours ago

Yeah but then they wouldn't get to collect people's biometric data to sell to the highest bidder.

[–] harrys_balzac@lemmy.dbzer0.com 37 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

I didn't realize there were still real people that use Tinder. I thought it was all bots by this point.

[–] hayvan@piefed.world 14 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

It was a spam bot swarm a decade ago.

I checked again around 2023, then it was full of human backed fake profiles that pushed cryptocoin scams. It's called pig butchering.

Today I assume it's still pog butchering but backed by LLMs instead of people.

[–] harrys_balzac@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 hours ago

I think I was last on it pre-pandemic and, yeah, it was a bot fest. The profiles that appeared to be legit humans weren't all that impressive either.

I can't imagine going back. Unless I pivot careers to crypto scammer.

[–] betterdeadthanreddit@lemmy.world 19 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

pog butchering

Pogs are back? Finally, my investment will pay off!

[–] Mercury@lemmy.world 8 points 4 hours ago
[–] IratePirate@feddit.org 18 points 10 hours ago

If this truly were about keeping bots off the platform, I'd predict a great improvement in how genAI renders human eyes. Either way: supposed problem not solved, but more sensitive data collected in the process. Task failed successfully.

[–] inari@piefed.zip 25 points 11 hours ago

Sure, let's pretend they care about that issue. It's not about collecting user data to re-sell later, oh no

load more comments
view more: next ›